image description
A large crowd attends Thursday's hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals. They broke into applause when it was confirmed a pot farm had withdrawn its application.

Williamstown Pot Farm Proposal Withdrawn by Applicant

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The applicant who had sought to create marijuana plantation on Blair Road withdrew its application for a special permit on Thursday night.
 
Massflora, a subsidiary of Colorado-based Euflora Cannabis Dispensaries, asked the Zoning Board of Appeals to let it pull the application with prejudice.
 
"My client thinks it's beset not to pursue that site and this project at that location," Massflora's attorney, Don Dubendorf, told the board.
 
Massflora already had approval from the town's Conservation Commission to go forward with the project, which included a 5-acre outdoor plantation and a 7,000 square-foot building.
 
But the bylaw regulating marijuana that town meeting passed in 2017 allowed production facilities only by special permit.
 
A March hearing before the ZBA drew a capacity crowd to the Selectmen's Meeting Room -- almost all in attendance to express concerns about the negative impact of the proposed facility in the neighborhood.
 
Pointing to the "substantially not more detrimental to the neighborhood" standard in the bylaw for special permits, residents who live near the proposed site cited several detrimental consequences, ranging from the noxious odor of marijuana in the field to light pollution from the security lights Massachusetts law mandates for such a facility.
 
Residents also expressed a fear that even with the state-mandated security measures in place, a pot-growing facility would attract crime -- using the example of a California case described in the January 2018 issue of Rolling Stone. "Several men in tactical gear, posing as authorities and armed with rifles, had ambushed the property," that article read in part.
 
Although word circulated on Thursday through the neighbors' attorney that Massflora planned to withdraw its request, more than a dozen residents still attended Thursday's hearing, breaking out in applause when the issue was laid to rest.

Tags: ZBA,   marijuana,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Vote No on 'Jungle' Primaries

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

They don't call them "jungle primaries" for nothing.

Question 3 on the November ballot would trash two-party primary elections and replace them with California-style, chaotic — and extraordinarily costly — "jungle" primaries that would destroy the very political parties that have kept America stable since Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison created them in the 1790s.

Jungle primaries put all candidates, regardless of party, on one ballot with the top two vote-getters facing off in the general election — even if they're from the same party. That would create chaos, but the real issue is money: Jungle primaries give a distinct advantage to candidates backed by corporate money and the super wealthy. In short, jungle primaries move our primaries from the ballot box to big donor meetings long before campaigning even begins.

When something this radical is proposed, you have to look at who's behind it, who's funding it, and ask "why" they are doing it.

Their philosophical guru is Danielle Allen, a Harvard professor who ran for governor in 2022 but couldn't get 15 percent of the Democratic Convention vote to win the party's endorsement.

The money behind this extreme attack on small "d" democratic politics tells us more. With over $5 million in the bank as of Aug. 28, this is a very well-funded campaign — the lion's share of which came from wealthy Boston-area private equity individuals.

Twenty-two private equity executives gave $3.99 million, or 77 percent of all the money from individuals. Current and former Bain Capital executives contributed $1.92 million, and Berkshire Partners executives put up $1.32 million. In short, 22 rich people put up nearly $4 million to change how five million of us vote. Yes, it seems the ultra-wealthy want to destroy the two-party system that has kept our politics stable for 200 years.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories