image description

Pittsfield ZBA Continues Two Marijuana Facility Hearings

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Zoning Board of Appeals deferred two special permit requests for two marijuana facilities to its Oct. 23 meeting, seeking clearer more complete information. 
 
Marijuana took the better part of the ZBA's two-hour meeting Sept. 18 and with residents both supporting and opposing proposed growing and retail facilities on Seymour Street and Pecks Road and questions amongst the board, the board agreed to hold off decisions until next month. 
 
"This is tough ... these are not easy things to resolve when you have the invasion of things into people's backyards that are new," Chairman Albert Ingegni, III said. "It is difficult but there are a lot of things to consider here so we are doing the best we can."
 
Northeast Cultivation LLC, which wants to convert a farm at 997 Peck's Road to an outdoor cultivation facility, took up the bulk of the meeting and attorney Bill Martin, representing Northeast, said they were willing to agree to some conditions that should mitigate possible odor from the plants.
 
"We are all in new territory when it comes to the marijuana business," he said. "My client wants to be a very good neighbor ... and not be disruptive to the neighborhood."
 
A representative from Northeast gave outlined some of the accommodations the company was willing to make, including improved lighting, relocating greenhouses, and ventilated tents that should eliminate possible odor.
 
Martin also had in hand 14 letters of support from abutters.
 
Many residents came out in support of farming. They said they would rather see something grown on the land than, say, a housing development.
 
Others said they have been growing marijuana nearby for years and it was never an issue.
 
There were also those opposed who said the smell is still a major concern. Others felt the farm would attract crime. There was a concern that property values would plummet and there would be noise pollution.
 
One resident just asked for some "teeth" in the conditions and thought if Northeast violated any of the conditions their harvest should be instantly eradicated. 
 
Board member John Fitzgerald came out against the project and motioned to deny. 
 
"There seems to be a lot of concern so I would like to make a motion that we deny," he said.
 
Fitzgerald did not receive a second.
 
The rest of the board just wanted more details and asked the applicant to codify the changes they pledged to make in the presentation. They also asked that the applicant answer some of the questions such as the decibel level of the fans before the next meeting.
 
"We are going to hammer this out and come back next month and I think we can put this in a format where we can still open it up to input from both sides," Ingegni said. "Then we can hopefully come to a conclusion."
 
In other business, the board agreed to delay a decision on a special permit request from True East Leaf that wants to establish a marijuana cultivation and retail operation at 161 Seymour St. with concerns with odor and parking.
 
The first concern was possible odor and board and Fitzgerald asked that True East Leaf develop a mitigation plan for odor.
 
"My concern is where this is located there are several businesses," he said. "If I were going to a restaurant and the odor was wafting about I don't think I would go to the restaurant."
 
As for parking, True East Leaf already received a parking waiver from the Community Development Board. Per the city's off-street parking requirements the business is required to have nine off-street parking spots for employees.
 
Attorney Anthony Doyle said the have agreements in place for parking off-site.
 
But the board still had concerns about congestion in the area and overflow parking affecting other businesses. 
 
"I have concerns about the location of this. It is a tight area and to me, it would very difficult to get people in and out," Fitzgerald said. "I don't want people out on the street arguing about parking."
 
Doyle said the location was formerly a bakery and it was not an issue in the past and part of the business model is to move people through quickly so parking congestion should not be an issue.
 
He said there are really not a lot of other parking options with parking in the area mostly locked up by BMC. The only option would be to bus people to the facility which would be too cumbersome. 
 
The board was concerned that customers would use abutting parking lots but Doyle said they have a good relationship with surrounding businesses and they do not foresee and issue. If an issue came up they would be willing to police the parking.  
 
"If it becomes an issue we will police it and keep people out of that parking lot," he said. "We have a great relationship with that neighborhood and we don't want to interfere with that."
 
Representatives from area restaurant Tahiti Take Out said parking was already an issue and they were concerned about True Leaf customers using their parking lot. They also had concerns about odor.   
 
The board asked the applicant to provide a parking plan and an odor mitigation plan at their October meeting.

Tags: marijuana,   parking,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Officials: Unlimited Trash Not Sustainable, Toters Offer Cost-Savings

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Unlimited trash pickup is not sustainable and will lead to higher taxes, city officials say.

Mayor Peter Marchetti began public outreach on Monday on the proposed five-year contract with Casella Waste Management for solid waste and recyclables. Older residents packed into the Ralph J. Froio Senior Center for the first of three community meetings.

On the table is a move to automated pickup utilizing 48-gallon toters, which would be at no cost to residents unless they require additional toters and would save the city $80,000 per year.

The goal is to execute a contract by July 1, the start of the fiscal year.

"Trash collection is not free. You're already paying for it as part of your taxes that you pay. In this administration, in this proposal there is no 'I'm looking to create a trash tax,''' Marchetti said, explaining that trash pickup for fiscal year 2025 is around $5.1 million and has doubled since he first served on the council in 2002.

"So we need to find a way to stem the cost of trash."

Some of the seniors praised the new plan while others had concerns, asking questions like "What is going to happen to the trash cans we have now?" "What if I live in rural Pittsfield and have a long driveway?" and "What happens if my toter is stolen?"

"I've lived in a lot of other places and know this is a big innovation that is taking place over the last 20,30 years," one resident said. "It's worked in most places. It's much better than throwing bags of garbage on the side of the road."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories