image description
The Pittsfield City Council meets on Tuesday over the Zoom platform that was broadcast on PCTV.

Pittsfield City Council Approves Hotel, Brewery TIF Agreements

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council accepted two amended tax incentive financing agreements with extended timelines in response to delays caused by the pandemic.
 
"We understand that both projects might be delayed because of COVID-19 specifically related to the timing of construction," Mayor Linda Tyer said Tuesday. "So we wanted to extend the period of the TIF agreement to give them an opportunity to get their projects underway and still have the benefit of the phased-in taxed increment finance plan."
 
City Council first accepted a TIF agreement with Robert Trask who plans to open a brewery and restaurant at 41 North St. that instead of spanning five years will span six.
 
Trask plans to purchase and invest $1.7 million in the former J. Allen's Clubhouse however he noted at a past subcommittee meeting that the pandemic could cause delays in the project.
 
The amended agreement will forgive 100 percent of the incremental increase in real estate property taxes in the first two years instead of just the first. From there this percent will decrease by 20 percent each year hitting 20 percent in 2026. 
 
41 North Tap Room would have to invest the full amount agreed upon in the property as well as creating 30 full-time jobs within five years.
 
The council also approved an allocation of $150,000 from the city's Economic Development (GE) Fund to help Trask purchase brewing equipment, however, this was not without a lengthy discussion. Some councilors felt they could no longer support the allocation with the pandemic disrupting the economy and shuttering existing businesses. 
 
"I think the time we are in right now and the way the economy is going we can’t perceive the future and in good conscienceness, I can’t vote for this because right now we have so many of our local business struggling or closed," Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio said. "We cant be handing out money at this point in time in the game."   
 
Councilor at Large Earl Persip disagreed and felt now more than ever the city has to support new business and move forward.
 
"I think it is important to continue to build business during these times ... I think we need to continue to move forward," Persip said. "...I will support this and i think it is important to build a strong economy and this will do that
 
Persip said the GE fund was created to help grow businesses and that the city has allocated separate funds to help existing businesses. Director of Community Development Deanna Ruffer clarified that once approved by HUD the city will have $500,000 for which businesses can apply.
 
Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi was also not in support of the amount and felt this allocation was an "unfair advantage" to a new bussiness.
 
"There are businesses that have been here for a long time in this city that have never asked the city for one dime," he said. "...These businesses have done it the hard way and ahve benefited in many ways...I just feel with these times we can’t afford this."
 
Ward 4 Councilor Christopher Connell said there was a brewery in the city that had failed in 2010 and Morandi was concerned that a new brewery could hurt the existing one.
 
Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo said the craft beer market was far different 10 years ago and Councilor at Large Peter White said the former Pittsfield Brew Works only left the city because its owners wanted to just brew beer and could not find a location in the city.
 
White said he thought the brewery will be an important attraction and job creator once the pandemic passes and the city starts the recovery process. Also, it would be better than an empty building on North Street and could actually support the surrounding business.
 
Trask chimed in and said the investment has now become much riskier with the post-pandemic landscape so uncertain.
 
"The risk for this investment is tenfold or more in terms of what it is going to look like for the public going out," he said. "This is more important now than it was before in terms of support from the city and I think there is a lot of potential here."
 
Ward 1 Councilor Helen Moon said she was surprised Trask wanted to continue with the project and felt if he was willing to take the risk the city should as well.
 
"When we know when we have a committed partner during these times when everything is so uncertain," she said. "That huge risk I think we have to take part in that with them because we are investing in ourselves."
 
Right before the vote, Connell asked to table it until councilors could meet in person rather than over a virtual platform. He said he has heard from many business owners who are upset about the allocation and felt if there was an open forum they would be present to share their displeasure. 
 
Council President Peter Marchetti said he spoke with Connell before the meeting about this issue and for this reason, they opened up the meeting to callers.
 
However, no one called in during public comment.
 
Connell’s motion failed with only Maffuccio and Morandi supporting it.
 
Before this vote, Connell said he planned to call a Charter Objection if it failed, however, he was discouraged by other councilors because it would only delay the vote until the next meeting. 
 
The council does not plan to meet in person during May because of the pandemic.
 
The council then voted to approve 7-3 with Councilors Connell, Maffucio and Morandi in opposition; Councilor at Large Yuki Cohen abstained.
 
The City Council also executed an amended TIF agreement with Mauer and Dilip Desai who plan to construct a 77-room Holiday Inn Express at 1055 South St.
 
The Desais said at a subcommittee meeting that if they are unable to break ground by June at the very latest, they would delay the project a year. 
 
The amended agreement is structured the same as the brewery's and the Desais would be responsible for $10 million in a new hotel and create 25 to 30 jobs,15 of which will be full time.
 
Morandi asked if there was a reason why they extended the agreements instead of just delaying them.
 
Ruffer said it is more difficult to postpone an agreement because it would need a new base valuation. 
 
"Structurally, it was the soundest approach," she said.  

Tags: tax incentive,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories