image description
An aerial image of Fairfield Dairy Farm with the area under consideration for an APR marked in red.

Williamstown Nonprofit Seeks CPA Funds for Agricultural Restriction

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Williamstown Rural Lands Foundation plans to ask the town for Community Preservation Act funds to support an Agricultural Preservation Restriction for a property on Green River Road.
 
WRLF Executive Director David McGowan was before the Agricultural Commission last week to ask that body for a letter of support for the application he plans to bring to the Community Preservation Committee next month.
 
Rural Lands is working with the owners of Fairfield Dairy Farm to secure an APR from the Massachusetts Department of Agriculture for "approximately 20 acres" McGowan told the commission, which voted unanimously to support the application.
 
"It's surrounded by APR land that Fairfield Dairy Farm had previously put into an APR," Ag Commission Chair Sarah Gardner said in describing the parcel under consideration. "What's different about this land is it's kind of the missing piece of the puzzle. It's between other APR land."
 
The APR program "offers to pay farmland owners the difference between the 'fair market value' and the 'agricultural value' of their farms in exchange for a permanent deed restriction which prevents any use of the property that will negatively impact its future agricultural viability," according to the MDAR website.
 
The program requires a local match added to the state contribution. In Williamstown's case, the local match would be a minimum of 10 percent, McGowan said.
 
Gardner told her colleagues that the commonwealth believes the soil on the Galusha family's farm is especially worth protecting.
 
"In my conversation with MDAR, I learned it normally pays $10,000 per acre for agricultural land, but in this instance they doubled that because they believe it's important," Gardner said. "The soils are important agricultural soils, and they think it's an important piece of the overall farm, which is the biggest farm in Williamstown."
 
McGowan confirmed that the state agency agreed to raise its normal cap of $10,000. But he noted that even at the higher cap of $20,000, along with the local contribution, the farm would be selling its land for less than it could get on the market.
 
"Williamstown qualifies for a 10 percent match … but even if the town put in 20 percent, there would still be a gap," McGowan said.
 
Gardner said the Galusha family is willing to make a sacrifice to ensure that the rich soil, currently used for forage, stays in agriculture.
 
"Either way, the seller is taking a financial hit," Gardner said. "They want the farmland to be preserved. I really think of it as a community service, in a way. It's looking toward the future, and it's in the common good.
 
"[APRs are] about preserving the resource for the future. It's not about any particular farm or any farmer. It's preserving the soil resource. They'll only do APRs on prime ag soil. That is why MDAR is willing to spend so much money on this."
 
McGowan declined to say what the land was appraised at or how much WRLF will be seeking from CPA funds. But based on the rough numbers he gave -- 20 acres, $20,000 per acre from the commonwealth and a 10 percent local match -- the application for town funds would be about $40,000.
 
The Community Preservation Committee is the gatekeeper which reviews applications for CPA funds and makes recommendations to town meeting for approval in the spring. McGowan said he plans to take advantage of one of the committee's pre-application meetings, which potential applicants can schedule on Dec. 10, 11 or 14, to discuss the APR project.
 
According to the Community Preservation Act, funds can be used for certain purposes: community housing, historic preservation and open space and recreation. Rural Lands' APR proposal would fall under the open space provision of the act.
 
The CPC expects the town to have about $324,000 to fund projects in the fiscal 2022 cycle (town meeting May 2021). One of the committee's regular applicants, the town's Affordable Housing Trust, already has expressed an intention to apply for $175,000 in new funding.

Tags: agricultural restriction,   CPA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Incomplete Picture from Greylock School Committee

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

At the October Mount Greylock School Committee meeting, there was much celebration over the student growth percentiles (SGP) from last year's MCAS test data (Spring 2026). Growth is worth celebrating. But I worry the meeting, and the coverage of it, left families and our community with an incomplete picture of how our students are doing in math.

"Growth" sounds like it means scores went up, but that isn’t quite what SGP measures. SGP compares each student to students in the state who scored about the same the year before, then ranks how they did this year against that group. If a whole group of similar students decreases, the student who decreases the least can still earn a high growth percentile. A strong SGP tells us our students did better than their peers who scored similarly the year before. It doesn't tell us whether they are at grade level.

For example, the current 6th grade class at Williamstown Elementary School (WES) has decreased in their grade-level math proficiency every year since their 3rd grade MCAS. In 2024, 64 percent of the class was meeting expectations; in 2025 48 percent were at grade level, and in 2026 only 33 percent of their class met grade-level expectations. Our current WES 5th grade class follows a similar trend, with 48 percent meeting grade-level math expectations last year vs 56 percent meeting expectations in 2025 when they were in 3rd grade.

Not every class follows this pattern; our current 7th graders gained to 62 percent last year. But seeing entire classes decrease is something that deserves our attention.

Growth comparisons across the state provide useful information, but they do not tell the complete story. We also need to look at where our students are in terms of grade-level proficiency and how those numbers are changing from year to year within the Mt. Greylock school district. This will be our first year with the math interventionist role filled at WES and our second year with the new i-Ready curriculum.

As we watch whether these changes are working, I hope the School Committee will discuss proficiency alongside growth in its public meetings, so our community can see the full picture. Growth matters, but it isn’t enough if fewer of our kids are reaching grade level each year.

Sincerely,

Jenna Hasenkampf
Williamstown, Mass.

Hasenkampf is a parent of WES students in Grades 2 and 4.

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories