image description

Dalton Debates Future for Troubled Green Committee

By Joe DurwiniBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

DALTON, Mass. — Select Board members continue to weigh whether or not to continue its Green Committee, a volunteer body that has recently provoked frustration from multiple town employees.

At its Monday session, Chair Robert Bishop updated the board on an investigation he has been conducting this month into complaints brought to light in January. These complaints includes a petition requesting the committee be curtailed that was brought forward by Town Planner Rebecca Slick and signed by seven other top town employees, including interim Town Manager Sandra Albano.

"I think this whole thing is just a huge misunderstanding and miscommunication problem," expressed Bishop, who proposed that Dalton look into having Berkshire Regional Planning Commission administer the grant funding that the Green Committee is currently involved in administering. Rather than disband the committee, he suggested that they wait for their next town manager to be installed and assess the committee's role going forward.

Other members voiced concerns more forcefully.

"I think we have a serious problem here, that's been going on for several years," said Select Board member John Boyle, who said the petition brought forward demanded action.

Members of the committee, which was formed by resident Cheryl Rose in 2013, have been accused of "openly defaming" town employees, and have lobbed criticism at the Select Board as well. In its televised December meeting, Rose expressed her lack of confidence "in our Select Board being competent to make decisions and get stuff done."

The petition from department heads represents a second strike for the volunteer panel; a memorandum from Dalton's health agent Ed Fahey complained about the way the committee was performing in its advisory capacity to the Board of Health, suggesting it be dissolved.

"This abusive language and criticism of other members of the town government has got to stop," said Boyle. "I don't blame people for calling us incompetent, that goes with the turf, but not hard working people that come to their job every day at Town Hall, they shouldn't have to put up with this.

Boyle proposed that he and Bishop meet privately with the committee's chair, Joseph Fish, and "lay down the law."

"Maybe it is time for some healthy turnover on the committee," added Select Board member Dan Esko.

Boyle contended there were as many as six former committee members who had left it due to "the atmosphere," who might be willing to return if "certain people were to leave."

With a consensus that involvement in administrating the Green Communities state grant should be taken out of the committee's purview, Select Board member Joe Diver questioned what function the committee would actually have if it continues. He proposed "pausing the committee" until after the new town manager is installed.

"We do need to identify and really come to agreement on what the purpose of the committee is, and I think the town manager can have a huge role in that," concurred Esko.

At the conclusion of discussion, the Select Board agreed to leave the ultimate fate of the committee undecided for now. Instead, Bishop and Boyle will meet with its chair about the tone and conduct of the committee, and report back to the rest of the Select Board at its next meeting.


Tags: green communities,   town boards,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories