image description
About 40 residents attend the ARPA public hearing at Conte Community School on Monday night.
image description
Mayor Linda Tyer explains the purpose of the hearing.
image description
After attendees took a survey on their phones, the results of the most selected public health issues were displayed in a cluster graph.

Pittsfield Sets Mental Health, Housing as Priorities for ARPA Funds

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Commissioner of Public Services Ricardo Morales writes down public issues on a board as residents bring them up.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Mental health and housing services were identified as top priorities for the $32.4 million in American Rescue Plan Act funds coming to the city.
 
On Monday, around 40 people gathered at Conte Community School for the first of four public hearings on the use of the federal funds. 
 
When prompted, the group identified mental health and housing as the greatest COVID-19-related public health needs.
 
Attendees voted that addressing "disparities in public health outcomes in the community" is the most urgent category of improvement needed and believed the top three services in need of help are homelessness prevention, behavioral health services, and services for at-risk children.
 
The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Act was passed by Congress and signed into law in March with the goal of stabilizing local government operations, households, small businesses, and other sectors affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
 
"The need for this money came out of looking at the Great Recession, and where the federal government put money in and where they didn't,"  Director of Community Development Deanna Ruffer said.
 
"And theoretically this is where they feel more work can be done and with the help of local governments, we can kickstart a little faster some of that recovery, and we can get closer to everyone that was impacted."
 
Pittsfield is receiving $32.4 million that is being allocated in two parts. The first deposit of $16.2 million happened about a month ago and the second will happen next year at this time.
 
Obligations for the spending must be made by the end of 2024 and the funds must be spent by 2026.
 
The city is also receiving a county allocation of $8.4 million in two phases. The funds are being distributed to communities on a per-capita basis because Berkshire County no longer has a county administrative structure.
 
"There was a belief at the beginning of the American Rescue Plan from some of our friends in the federal government that this was going to be the communities can do whatever they want with this money, and then we got 150 pages of rules," Mayor Linda Tyer explained.
 
"And we spent about, I don't know, a couple of weeks at least, all of us read the rules and then we got some summaries of the rules, and then we participated in a whole bunch of webinars and it's taken us two months to really for us to understand what this really is all about, and it has so much potential, and our view is that we want to have as much community engagement as possible."
 
The funds can be dispersed into the community in seven different ways to respond to the COVID-19 public health emergency but Pittsfield only qualifies for six because the city was not deemed in need of broadband infrastructure.
 
The money can be used to respond to the public health emergency, address negative economic impacts, help neighborhoods disproportionally impacted such as Morningside and West Side, give premium pay to low-income essential employees, offset the loss of local government revenue, and invest in water/sewer infrastructure.
 
It can not be used for tax cuts, pension funds, to pay legal settlements, or to match other federal grant funds.
 
Ruffer outlined some possible public health uses including testing, infection prevention, paying medical expenses for individuals, and new or enhanced services for mental health in response to the trauma of the pandemic
 
In a group query, mental health and housing were identified as the greatest COVID-19 related public health needs.
 
The attendees also discussed equity and human service needs, which are said to play into each other.
 
A member of the public relayed a message that was gathered through community outreach, stating that there is a need for respect of marginalized peoples' voices and that they don’t feel heard by the city in such meetings.
 
Many spoke about lacking resources in human service fields including child care, mental health care, disabled and elderly care.
 
"I work in human services and one of my questions and in some of these gaps and services are due to the fact that we don't have enough mental health workers to do the job even if the funds are allocated to that," one attendee said.
 
"And so my question is, can this money be given at all to make to make the career more attractive to help people loan forgiveness, higher wages, I'm one of the CO responders you reference, and I love my job and we need more people, and I wonder if kind of delegating this money without realizing that we don't have a workforce to execute it is short-sighted."
 
It was mentioned that the United States may need nationwide post-traumatic stress services for frontline workers, especially for medical workers.
 
Several other pandemic-related public health needs were brainstormed during the hearing. These include re-defining basic needs; disability care; child-care infrastructure; alternatives for elderly residents; and reviving programs that ended during the pandemic.
 
The next hearing, on economic recovery, will be held at on Wednesday at 1 p.m. at the Berkshire Innovation Center.
 
A housing and neighborhoods hearing will be held on Aug. 23 at 6 p.m. in the cafeteria at Morningside Community School and a hearing for cultural organizations will be held at the Lichtenstein Center for the Arts on Aug. 25 at 11 a.m.

Residents can find more information about the ARPA on the city website and can submit feedback to ARPA@cityofpittsfield.org.

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public comment on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and had public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories