image description
The Board of Health wants to revisit mosquito spraying.

Pittsfield Board of Health Wants to Reconsider Mosquito Spray Opt Out

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health is pushing back against the City Council's April decision to vote to opt out of the city's mosquito spraying program.
 
They have asked that the panel reconsiders its vote and will state their case at the next Public Health and Safety subcommittee meeting on Sept. 9.
 
At the very least, the board would like to be able to finish off the season with mosquito spraying after an onslaught of the insects caused by heavy rainfall.
 
Berkshire County Mosquito Control Project, which the city contracts with, reportedly got an influx of calls from residents in the flood plain complaining about the increased mosquito population after significant rain and minor flooding in July.
 
"Early in July, we had some significant rain and we had some very minor flooding in mid-July, so I contacted [Director of Public Health Gina Armstrong,] and explained that we saw some flood species in our surveillance traps, I think it was July 26 and I said, the major problem is on its way because the river flooding issue we were aware of," spray  project Superintendent Chris Horton said to the board last week.
 
"So, if we had the ability to go forward with the spray, I would have recommended it at that time and targeted it for one week, warm conditions, basically we're talking about one week time from first stage larva to adult mosquito, so we could have targeted an adult response to the date of emergence."
 
"The river went back in on the 23rd and we got a flood of calls on Aug. 2, we had a flood of calls from these neighborhoods within the flood plain, complaining about a plague of mosquitoes."
 
There are three communities in Pittsfield that are especially affected by mosquitos because of their geographical location. These areas are in the flood plain where mosquitos deposit eggs and where the river flows over.
 
The target areas include southeastern Pittsfield along Elm Street and Willaims Street to Dalton Division Road and East Street, from Fred Garner Park along the Housatonic River to the city sewage treatment plant, and in the center of the city near Waconah Park.  
 
Horton revealed that there are currently no cases of West Nile virus in Pittsfield but there was one in the town of Richmond as of Aug. 12.
 
In late April, the council voted to opt out of the adulticide mosquito spraying portion. Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio had submitted a petition prompting the vote, citing "recent studies showing that mosquito spraying is not supported by science and is bad for the environment and bad for humans."
 
The board said there was no evidence submitted with the petition's claim of spraying being harmful and will ask the Public Health and Safety subcommittee to make a decision based on facts.
 
The Board of Health has overseen the project since 2012.
 
"We should strenuously insist that the decision from the Public Health and Safety Committee, which is then been being referred to the city council, in general, should be evidence-based," board Chairman Dr. Alan Kulberg said.
 
"At this point, the City Council has shut down the spraying of the adulticide spraying based upon unsubstantiated claims, as if to add insult to injury, they have doubled down and are now asking to shut down the mosquito control program completely."
 
The board also speculated that shutting down the citywide program would be privatizing public health because it would suggest that only people who can afford mosquito spraying would have to hire a private contractor to do so.
 
Horton added that a private firm would likely not be taking all of the precautions that his program would take as a state organization.
 
"We have a lot of best management practices that we follow as a state organization to mitigate impacts on non-targets," he said. "We do everything between dusk and dawn to eliminate the risk of damaging pollinators, we use specific products that have a very short half-life in the environment, and we are using basically specific products with EPA labeling that proves efficacy and safety for people in the environment."  
 
Horton believes that Maffuccio's petition was influenced by a statewide movement happening around the time it was submitted. Communities across the state were rising against an emergency legislation filed in 2020 that gave the state reclamation board, which is the program's oversight authority, the ability to perform either proactive mosquito control or emergency health response mosquito control in other areas of the state.
 
When that was proposed, some thought it was an overreach by the government and in the final legislation is an option for communities to opt out of the state program for aerial spraying during a public health emergency.
 
An alternate plan for mosquito control was required by opting-out communities by May 15.
 
"I think people in many communities didn't realize that that didn't apply to them, it didn't apply to Pittsfield because we were already part of the local mosquito control program," Armstrong said. "I think that was a factor in why the City Council wanted to take a vote in the deadline, but it really didn't apply and unfortunately we weren't in attendance [when] that meeting occurred."

Tags: mosquito spraying,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories