Former Pine Cobble Teacher Charged With Assaulting Student

Staff ReportsPrint Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — A former Pine Cobble School teacher has pleaded not guilty to repeated aggravated sexual assault of a student. 
 
According to the Bennington (Vt.) Banner, Peter Hirzel, 60, of Pownal, Vt., was arraigned in Vermont District in Bennington on Wednesday. The middle school student was allegedly assaulted repeatedly over a 10-month period at the suspect's home.
 
Hirzel had been teaching middle school math since 2004, first in California and then at Pine Cobble starting in 2018, according to his LinkedIn profile. He posted that at Pine Cobble, he was "also seeing to the day-to-day academic lives of students as the eighth grade homeroom teacher and an advisor."
 
The victim's mother reported that she saw Hirzel as a positive support during what was a tough a year for her child and that she allowed the victim to go to Hirzel's home, according to the police report.
 
The school said his employment at Pine Cobble ended in mid-March 2021, though not why, and his current status on LinkedIn is "somewhat retired" and but open to "the right job."
 
"We are devastated by this news and our hearts are broken for the victim," said Head of School Sue Wells on Thursday. "However, due to the ongoing criminal case, Pine Cobble is referring all questions to law enforcement officials."
 
She did say the school requires background checks and fingerprinting for all employees. 
 
Hirzel is being held without bail at the Marble Valley Regional Correctional Facility in Rutland, Vt., pending a weight of evidence hearing. The Banner reports he is facing a minimum sentence of 25 years, a maximum of life imprisonment and a possible $50,000 fine if convicted.

Tags: sexual assault,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

AG Clears Williamstown Select Board in Open Meeting Complaint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Attorney General's Office on Wednesday cleared the Select Board in an Open Meeting Law complaint filed by iBerkshires.com while simultaneously confirming the supposition at the heart of the complaint.
 
The AGO found that the board did technically violate the OML when it moved to executive session on May 11, a misstep the board previously acknowledged in its response to the complaint.
 
The meeting in question was held behind closed doors to discuss the town's response to a proposal from Williams College to acquire the former town garage site at 59 Water St.
 
At the time of the May 11 meeting, the board had held no public discussion, let alone a vote, on whether to enter into negotiations with Williams, the lone respondent to a request for proposals issued by the town for the 1.27-acre parcel.
 
The board cited an exception to the Open Meeting Law that states executive sessions are appropriate if, "holding the discussion in open session may have a detrimental effect on the Board's negotiating position."
 
iBerkshires.com maintained in its complaint that the executive session was premature given the fact that the board on May 11 had no one to negotiate with as it had not agreed — publicly — to negotiate with the college.
 
The news organization cited the fact that the town's RFP clearly indicated a multi-step process in which the board first would decide whether to engage with any of the respondents (assuming multiple bids were made) and then enter into negotiation with one of the respondents.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories