Letter: Williamstown Planning Board Should Consider Social, Economic, Environmental Impacts

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Williamstown is known as a desirable community characterized by an affluent, highly educated, and increasingly diverse population. At the same time, the town aspires to be more inclusive. We want to welcome individuals and families of all income levels and racial and cultural backgrounds. One roadblock to inclusivity is the high cost of housing in our town, and limited housing options.

To address these issues the Planning Board is proposing changes to the zoning code that would allow a single building to have up to four housing units in general residence (GR) district, that area of town served by public water and sewer system and characterized by relatively dense residential neighborhoods. In addition, the minimum residential lot size and setbacks would be lessened. These moves help to reduce the impact of exclusionary zoning practices that have made it harder for low-income people to live in town.

Other articles propose reducing lot size and dimensional requirements, and allowing 3-4 unit buildings in Rural Residence 2 (RR2). This area of Williamstown is home to open space, meadows, forested areas, and our few remaining farms. It is not served by public water and sewer. Reducing lot size, in this case from 2.5 acres to 1.8 acres, will not increase housing opportunities for those who have limited financial resources. Acquiring a buildable lot and installing a well and septic system alone can cost more than a modestly priced house.



I know we want to believe that relaxing these zoning regulations will increase access to reasonably priced homes, but it's very unlikely to happen. More certain is that we will lose farmland along with wildlife habitat and corridors, we will contaminate water resources through a proliferation of septic systems, we will increase the severity of flooding with more impermeable surfaces, we will move away from our goal of carbon neutrality, and threaten other environmental benefits.

We should avoid artificially pitting affordable housing arguments against the environment. We need to take a balanced and holistic view to policy changes and consider the interplay among social, economic, and environmental sustainability. To learn more and to participate in this discussion, please come to the public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 22, on Zoom or in person at the Williamstown Town Hall.

 

Stephanie Boyd
Williamstown, Mass.

Boyd is a member of the Planning Board. 

 

 

 


Tags: zoning,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Town, Residents Concerned About Forest Service Plan to Use Williamstown Road

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — A timber manager with the U.S. Forest Service told the Select Board on Monday that his office was willing to work with the town to address concerns raised by residents over a plan to haul timber out of the Green Mountain National Forest across the state line in Vermont.
 
An overflow crowd of residents from both Williamstown and Pownal, Vt., attended Monday's meeting at Town Hall, where Stacy Stratton and other officials from the Forest Service laid out plans to cut and remove 1 million board feet of wood — about 2,000 cords — from the woodland just north of town.
 
The sticking point is how officials expect that wood to be removed from the forest: down White Oaks Road, a narrow, twisting residential street that town's director of public works says is ill-suited for the operation.
 
DPW Director Craig Clough was joined at the microphone Monday by nearly a dozen residents of Williamstown and Pownal to question elements of what the Forest Service is calling the "South of Route 9 Integrated Resource Project."
 
Most of those concerns centered on White Oaks Road.
 
Stratton told the board that somewhere in the neighborhood of 200 log truck trips will be required to remove the wood that the service plans to remove from the forest, but that number does not include all the heavy equipment that will need to be taken to the cutting site or the daily traffic from loggers traveling to and from the site.
 
The project itself could take anywhere from one to five years, Stratton said. That number won't be known until the Forest Service puts the job out to bid.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories