Letter: Zoning Changes Will Have Cumulative Effects

Letter to the Editor05:30PM / Wednesday, June 08, 2022Print Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

What might the cumulative effects be of the Williamstown Planning Board's proposed warrant articles to be voted on at town meeting?

The former chair of the Planning Board stated that breaking their proposal into multiple articles would allow residents to vote on the merits of each specific change to the bylaws. While this approach seems considerate, it also masks two crucially important aspects overall: the broad scope of the proposed changes across many bylaws; and the cumulative effects of these changes if passed.

The Planning Board has put forward 10 warrant articles total. Contrary to claims of only "tweaking around the margins," these articles encompass many and, in some cases, radical changes affecting nearly everyone in town.

Let's consider only Articles 40, 41, 43, and 46. Article 40 would allow 3-4 unit dwellings in General Residence by right, but fails to call attention to the fact that it would also allow the same in the Southern Gateway (along Cold Springs Road). Article 41 will remove several barriers to dense development in Rural Residence zones 2 and 3. Article 43 proposes several radical changes, including increasing the number of allowable units per parcel (although the exact wording would allow up to 24 units "per group" per parcel, and there are no bylaw limits to the number of allowable groups other than dimensional requirements). Article 46 would change the scope of consideration for extending public utilities past undeveloped parcels.

The Southern Gateway exists to "protect the scenic southern entrance to Williamstown from overdevelopment while also ensuring the viability of existing businesses and residences." Rural Residence 2 and 3 exist "for typical rural uses with which single-family homes are compatible. …. [and] is intended to provide for the protection and preservation of special community service districts from the dangers of development," respectively.

If passed, the four articles above can be combined to not only allow the extension of public utilities, the development of 3-4 unit dwellings, the clustering of up to 24 units per group with only dimensional limitations to the total number of possible groups, but could do so throughout the Southern Gateway and Rural Residence 2 and 3. This represents more than one-third of the town's total area, and a majority of its farmable land.

I strongly urge residents to understand the cumulative effects of these changes, and that the changes may only require a simple majority to pass at town meeting.

Cory Campbell
Williamstown, Mass.

iBerkshires.com Text Ads

Greylock Youth SummerFest

Come join in on the wealth building fun! August 3-8. Click for event details. Insured by NCUA.

www.greylock.org

rk MILES Blding Materials

Are You Ready to Update Your Home? Start With rk MILES. 4 Locations (800)670-7433

www.rkmiles.com

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee OKs Updated Policy on Seclusion, Restraint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
05:57AM / Tuesday, August 25, 2026

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee recently approved an updated policy on time-outs, seclusion and the physical restraint of students.

The policy is based on updated state regulations that came down last winter. Superintendent Joseph Bergeron told the panel at its August meeting that his office waited on recommendations from the Massachusetts Association of School Committees that were released in May and ran the proposed changes past the district's legal counsel.

That timing — and an expectation from the commonwealth that districts have the updated policy in place for the start of the 2026-27 academic year — led to an expedited process for the School Committee, which did not do a first read with a vote at a subsequent meeting as is its practice.

"Policy JKAA speaks to the ways the school district and our procedures shall abide by the updated state regulations," Bergeron said. "We're not going to have a lot of leeway.

"Nothing about the way we interact with our students on a day-to-day basis is being shifted by this."

For example, the commonwealth does not allow schools to use "seclusion," or, "the involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room or area, with or without adult supervision," except some extreme cases, like when, "when student behavior poses an imminent threat of assault, or imminent serious physical harm to self or others, but only if safeguards are accounted for," the updated policy reads.

"From the state's perspective and my perspective, the idea of locking a child in a room without adult supervision is something we've never done," Bergeron said. "And it's something the state wants to make explicitly that nobody ever does."

View Full Story