Clark Art Opens Newest Exhibition, Tauba Auerbach and Yuji Agematsu: Meander on July 16

Print Story | Email Story

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Tauba Auerbach and Yuji Agematsu: Meander, opening July 16, 2022 at the Clark Art Institute, presents an exhibition pairing new works by the two New York-based artists. The exhibition continues through October 16, 2022. 

Presented in parallel galleries in the Lunder Center at Stone Hill on the Clark’s upper campus, the exhibition features two distinct—but complementary—artistic practices united by the notion of the meander, a self-avoiding line, as both motif and method. 

“Yuji Agematsu and Tauba Auerbach are both vibrant and compelling artists, but in very different ways,” said Olivier Meslay, Hardymon Director of the Clark. “This exhibition looks at their work independently but challenges the viewer to follow the lines that connect them. Working on dissimilar scales and with varied materials, both artists imbue their art with minute detail while addressing big, cosmic questions.”

For Auerbach (b. 1981, San Francisco; lives and works in New York), the twisting, self-avoiding line of the meander traces global traditions of ornament as much as waveforms in physics and space-filling curves in geometry. The artist’s restless experimentation in a range of media produces work that is as rigorous as it is visually arresting: calligraphic drawing, infrared imaging, and large-format painting are all part of Auerbach’s complex and expanding universe.

For Agematsu (b. 1956, Kanagawa, Japan, lives and works in New York) and his practice of walking, collecting, and archiving, meander implies drift—both his own paths through the city and those of other people and things. Agematsu’s handheld sculptures are like small worlds, and the objects he finds—a foil wrapper, spent fireworks, a fishbone—interest him both aesthetically and anthropologically. Agematsu’s practice is both rhythmic and improvisational; his imperative is to keep moving.

In distinctive ways, both artists study the flows of matter and energy around us, oscillating between intuition and analysis, entropy and order, difference and repetition, and a vast range of scales. The exhibition publication, a special issue of the journal The Serving Library Annual, is themed on the meander more broadly, with contributors approaching it from archaeological, ecological, mathematical, narrative, neurological, and other perspectives. 

“The meander is a classical ornamental form with global roots, but it is also a way of thinking and moving that yields rich artistic results,” said Robert Wiesenberger, curator of contemporary projects. “Seeing Auerbach and Agematsu side-by-side lets visitors appreciate two artists’ contrasting approaches to some common questions.”

For more information, visit clarkart.edu or call 413 458 2303.

Use of facemasks is optional for all visitors. For details on health and safety protocols, visit clarkart.edu/health.


Tags: Clark Art,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Moving Superintendent Evaluation to Fall

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass.—The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee this month discussed moving its evaluation of the superintendent from the spring to the fall starting in 2027.
 
Chair Julia Bowen brought the idea to the table as part of her proposed calendar for the committee's work during the 2026-27 academic year, saying that a move to the autumn will allow the committee to factor data from the preceding year into its evaluation.
 
"To the extent that [Superintendent Joseph Bergeron's] goals are tied to school performance and, specifically, MCAS [scores], we don't get that or other end of school year summative information until the fall," Bowen said. "Many schools I've worked with and know of actually moved their school leader evaluation to the fall so they can take advantage of all the data that's actually available, rather than doing it in the June time frame.
 
"The other point on that is, as it is, we otherwise vote for Joe's goals in September/October and evaluate him in May, and that's not a year. If we can do it fall to fall, we actually get a full year of work from when we agree on the goals."
 
The committee's most experienced member, Carolyn Greene, raised a concern about breaking with the practice of completing the evaluation process in May and June.
 
"It feels natural to evaluate a superintendent at the close of a school year, not the beginning of a school year," Greene said. "We're still in it in May and June. We're still in it in terms of our mindsets. Sometimes we don't meet in July. We come back in August and do a ‘retreat.' We're now meant to hit the ground running with an evaluation in September based on the work of the previous school year. And the reason is we don't get all the data from the previous school year until September.
 
"The rhythm is off for me. But it could just be that I'm so used to the previous rhythm. I don't want to oppose it. I just do have some reservations about it."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories