Mount Greylock School Committee OKs Selection Process for Field Designer

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee last week moved a step closer to hiring a designer to make plans for a new athletic field and track on the Cold Spring Road campus.
 
The district has been discussing the project in various iterations since shortly after it began moving forward with an addition/renovation project at the middle/high school that concluded in 2018.
 
The current plan is to be able to build a new natural grass multisport playing field, ringed by a running track, using proceeds from a $5 million capital gift from Williams College.
 
On Thursday, the School Committee appointed a five-person designer selection committee to review responses later this month to a request for proposals that the district issued to find an architect.
 
Superintendent Jason McCandless, Business Administrator Joe Bergeron, Director of Operations and Technology Rob Wnuk, School Committee member Carolyn Greene and health and wellness teacher and track coach Brian Gill will be tasked with interviewing finalists for the contract and possibly making a final selection on July 27.
 
To expedite the process, the committee's Finance Subcommittee recommended that the selection committee be authorized to make a final selection of an architect if there is agreement among at least two-thirds of its members, or a "super majority" of four members, if all five participate in the vote.
 
If the committee cannot choose a finalist by more than a simple majority decision, it would send the question to the full School Committee to make a decision.
 
The Finance Subcommittee had hoped to include Mount Greylock's athletic director on the selection panel, but Lindsey von Holtz will be out of town next Wednesday and unavailable to interview the finalists.
 
Throughout the various stages of a process that previously looked at building an artificial turf field at the school, von Holtz has contributed to various committees and working groups on the topic.
 
"Lindsey is very comfortable moving forward," McCandless told the School Committee. "We still have a five-member committee. We have Brian [Gill] representing the athletic community and the physical education and wellness staff here in the school district. We also have [owners project manager] Skanska helping us sort through what we learn from interviews and bringing their experience in working with all or most of these design firms.
 
"Of course, she wishes she was in a position to do this, but she totally understands our timing."
 
Responses to the district's RFP are due on Thursday, July 21. Von Holtz, if available, will help review the responses come up with a list of up to three finalists to be interviewed by the selection committee next week, according to the process approved by the School Committee at its July 14 meeting.
 
In other business at that meeting, McCandless informed the School Committee that the district is re-advertising for the newly created position of Director of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging.
 
"We have recently informed the applicants that we are reposting this and re-advertising this and casting what we hope is a wider net, simply to get more candidates and more diverse candidates – diverse in many ways, including geographically diverse," McCandless said.
 
The superintendent acknowledged that he had hoped to have the new administrator on board in time for the start of the 2022-23 academic year. But that might not happen.
 
"It's always difficult in the school world because you envision someone joining you on July 1, and then you envision someone joining you in time for school to start, and that's not how this process has worked out," McCandless said. "And we are very committed to running the best process we can, getting the best applicant pool we can and choosing the best individual to serve this role that we can.
 
"The timing, to some degree, has to come second place to those aims."

Tags: MGRS,   playing fields,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

AG Clears Williamstown Select Board in Open Meeting Complaint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Attorney General's Office on Wednesday cleared the Select Board in an Open Meeting Law complaint filed by iBerkshires.com while simultaneously confirming the supposition at the heart of the complaint.
 
The AGO found that the board did technically violate the OML when it moved to executive session on May 11, a misstep the board previously acknowledged in its response to the complaint.
 
The meeting in question was held behind closed doors to discuss the town's response to a proposal from Williams College to acquire the former town garage site at 59 Water St.
 
At the time of the May 11 meeting, the board had held no public discussion, let alone a vote, on whether to enter into negotiations with Williams, the lone respondent to a request for proposals issued by the town for the 1.27-acre parcel.
 
The board cited an exception to the Open Meeting Law that states executive sessions are appropriate if, "holding the discussion in open session may have a detrimental effect on the Board's negotiating position."
 
iBerkshires.com maintained in its complaint that the executive session was premature given the fact that the board on May 11 had no one to negotiate with as it had not agreed — publicly — to negotiate with the college.
 
The news organization cited the fact that the town's RFP clearly indicated a multi-step process in which the board first would decide whether to engage with any of the respondents (assuming multiple bids were made) and then enter into negotiation with one of the respondents.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories