Pittsfield School Building Needs Panel Looks to Restructuring

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Superintendent of Schools Joseph Curtis wants to extend the districtwide restructuring study's request for quotes (RFQ) timeline after garnering no response.

He reported this at the second reconvened meeting of the School Building Needs Commission last week. There was not a quorum and the panel was unable to vote on a new RFQ but members were given an update on the process.

"We did cancel the last meeting because we had every anticipation of providing an update on the number of proposals that were submitted based on the RFQ that I overviewed in our last meeting," Curtis said.

"Unfortunately, we did not have any proposals submitted so we began communication."

The district has reached out to the 20 contractors who solicited the proposal and asked why they chose not to make a submission. Each person who was consulted said the timeline was too aggressive to perform the number of services the district needs before it submits a statement of interest to the Massachusetts School Building Authority.

Separating the educational study portion of the RFQ from the facilities was considered but the contractors ultimately supported keeping it together, said Curtis.

"All in all, after talking with those who requested, we decided to proceed with posting an updated RFQ.  We're now titling it the 'Pittsfield Public Schools Master Plan.' We have provided different numbers so that the original contractors that sought the proposal won't get confused thinking that it's the same proposal just slightly retooled," he explained.

"Unfortunately, the new timeline really stretches to roughly January of 2024. So predominantly, the entire next school year is what we receive feedback on in receiving the information from the study that we're seeking, which would put us back on track in possibly submitting a statement of interest in April of 2024."

He pointed out that there could be potential policy changes that come out of the process for the school committee to vote on.


The commission reconvened in September after not meeting for several years. The city has $200,000 to do a restructuring study of the school district that addresses its physical and general structure.

There has been a lot of discussion about the district's community schools Morningside and Conte, Curtis reported, and Pittsfield High School.

The RFQ has multiple phases: to establish goals and a project schedule; student enrollment projections and student facilities to serve based on current enrollment; comprehensive facility assessment of the city’s four unrenovated schools and facilities master plan of the remaining schools; preparing a draft and final reports; and community presentation.

The process is aimed to be year-long and will ultimately be voted on by the City Council. The city would like it to be very public and generate a good amount of feedback.

Possible recommendations that could come out of the study are redistricting, downsizing brick-and-mortar sites, and restructuring grade spans.

The district has a total of 15 sites including eight elementary schools, two middle schools, and two high schools and enrollment has dropped over the years.

In January, the School Committee is set to vote on Taconic High School becoming solely vocational.

If the panel is in favor, Taconic will only accept Career Technical Education (CTE) students in the fall of 2023 and, by the fall of 2027, will be all vocational. Any non-CTE students would go to Pittsfield High School, changing the current structure that decides a student's high school by where they went to middle school if they don't exercise school choice.


Tags: school building committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories