Adams Selectmen Discuss Issues with Mount Royal Inn

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

ADAMS, Mass. — The Board of Selectmen once again had to table innkeeper license renewal for Mount Royal Inn, with just over a week left until the end-of-year renewal deadline. 

 

The board met with Syed Bokhari, the owner of the inn, last Wednesday to discuss concerns raised at a previous meeting regarding multiple potential code violations, including guests staying too long, inadequate bookkeeping and issues with the fire system. Board Vice Chair Christine Hoyt said, at the time of the meeting, Mount Royal Inn had still not submitted any renewal paperwork. 

 

"We don't have a single piece of paper from you indicating that you'd like to renew your innkeeper license," she said. 

 

Bokhari, who said he never received any emails or letters about the paperwork, was given extra copies to fill out at the meeting. He said the inn can provide an online list of tenants if that information is needed. 

 

The inn has an agreement with the Louison House, which provides transitional housing for the homeless, to provide temporary housing. Bokhari denied that people stay longer than 30 days, which would violate the license.

 

"As per my understanding with them, nobody stays more than 30 days," he said. "Take that person out on the 24th, 23rd, 25th day, put them in another motel for five days, six days, whatever, because we also understand the law of residency." 

 

Fire Chief John Pansecchi said code and other issues with the fire system have been resolved, but only after he notified the inn of problems. Bokhari said the incidents indicate the fire system is working. 

 

"This means the system is up and running. If the system is not up and running, it will not trigger the alarm system," he said. "As far as I'm concerned, I'm trying to be on the top of each and everything whatever I can." 

 

Pansecchi said he still has concerns about the occupancy and people staying longer than 30 days. 

 

"Whenever I've been down there, it seems to see faces in all the same rooms. I have not seen a change since the beginning of the year," he said. "Two faces here or there change, but a lot of the same people are there." 

 

Building Commissioner Gerald Garner said staff at the inn told him to contact the Louison House when he asked for a list of those staying there. He said he was unable to get the proper information needed to complete his inspection before the meeting. 

 

"I also have someone that's been living there for quite some time and actually applied for permanent residency," he said. Garner said, when he asked what was the longest someone had stayed at the inn, a staff member told him six months. 

 

Nancy Jolin, who attended the meeting representing Louison House, explained they check the rooms daily to ensure there is no code or other violations. She also assured the board they make sure no one stays longer than 30 days. 

 

"Every time we move somebody out, or we do a room change, which we have to do every 28 days so that it's not considered a residency. And we do that faithfully," she said. "And I can tell you I've done it twice in the last couple of weeks. But for every person that we find housing for there's six more at our door, and it's heartwrenching." 

 

Jolin said they have a list of the people residing in the building, which the town can access at any time. Selectman Richard Blanchard, as well as several other board members, said throughout the meeting that the inn staff needs to have this information available at all times. 

 

"This issue is with Mount Royal. Mount Royal has to follow laws, one being a list. Nobody should have to run to somebody else to get a list," he said. "It should be there. It's a safety thing. You talked about the homeless, don't they deserve a safe place to reside? ... If they don't know, or can't provide, emergency services with a list of who is their, how is that necessarily safe?" 

 

The board intends to have another meeting this week to settle any other license-related issues but none had been scheduled by Monday.


Tags: license board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Progress Means Moving on Paper Mill Cleanup

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Our town is facing a clear choice: move a long-abandoned industrial site toward cleanup and productive use or allow it to remain a deteriorating symbol of inaction.

The Community Development team has applied for a $4 million EPA grant to remediate the former Curtis Mill property, a site that has sat idle for more than two decades. The purpose of this funding is straightforward: address environmental concerns and prepare the property for safe commercial redevelopment that can contribute to our tax base and economic vitality.

Yet opposition has emerged based on arguments that miss the point of what this project is designed to do. We are hearing that basement vats should be preserved, that demolition might create dust, and that the plan is somehow "unimaginative" because it prioritizes cleanup and feasibility over wishful reuse of a contaminated, aging structure.

These objections ignore both the environmental realities of the site and the strict federal requirements tied to this grant funding. Given the condition of most of the site's existing buildings, our engineering firm determined it was not cost-effective to renovate. Without cleanup, no private interest will risk investment in this site now or in the future.

This is not a blank check renovation project. It is an environmental remediation effort governed by safety standards, engineering assessments, and financial constraints. Adding speculative preservation ideas or delaying action risks derailing the very funding that makes cleanup possible in the first place. Without this grant, the likely outcome is not a charming restoration, it is continued vacancy, ongoing deterioration, and zero economic benefit.

For more than 20 years, the property has remained unused. Now, when real funding is within reach to finally address the problem, we should be rallying behind a practical path forward not creating obstacles based on narrow or unrealistic preferences.

I encourage residents to review the proposal materials and understand what is truly at stake. The Adams Board of Selectmen and Community Development staff have done the hard work to put our town in position for this opportunity. That effort deserves support.

Progress sometimes requires letting go of what a building used to be so that the community can gain what it needs to become.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories