image description
The parking configuration would increase parking by around 40 percent.

Downtown Pittsfield Inc. Proposes Diagonal Parking on North Street

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Managing Director of Downtown Pittsfield Inc. (DPI) Rebecca Brien wants to make North Street diagonal head in parking after a survey found that 60 percent of downtown residents support the reconfiguration. 
 
On Thursday the Traffic Commission referred her petition to the Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales and the new City Engineer Tyler Shedd. 
 
"We actually brought a petition to the City Council specifically in regards to a poll and survey that we had put out to our membership but also other businesses, residents, and people who are in the downtown area, and they (had) a 60 percent response supporting a change in parking," Brien explained. 
 
"What we would ideally like to see is the single traffic lanes in each direction, a smaller bike lane that would still service individuals who are on bikes, and the diagonal head in parking to increase the parking spaces in that area." 
 
DPI would like a study conducted to see where it is feasible to do the change without altering any major structures from Park Square to at least Maplewood Avenue or possibly Carr Hardware. 
 
Morales said that there is enough space between the existing single-travel lane and the curb to have 60-degree diagonal parking with a six-foot bike lane. 
 
It would increase parking by around 40 percent. 
 
As far as he knows, bike lanes behind this kind of parking are not the best solution it could work with a single travel lane slowing down traffic. 
 
"It becomes a nonissue, becomes trivial at lower speeds," Morales explained. 
 
"And I think we have proven that single-lane travel on North Street has reduced the speed significantly and reducing that gap will do so even further." 
 
Other factors such as space for deliveries would also have to be considered, as there would have to be designated spaces and would require an analysis to determine where a loading zone could be placed. 
 
The change would likely result in at least a partial resurfacing of the street. 
 
In other news, the commission referred a petition from Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren requesting to resolve excessive traffic and speeding on Cromwell Avenue to police Sargeant Michael Maddalena and Morales. 
 
"As you guys could probably guess traversing the City of Pittsfield if you've ever been in that area it appears that Cromwell is a bypass for the light at Crane (Avenue) and Upper North (Street,)" Warren explained. 
 
"And I've received some complaints." 
 
He would like a study done to determine current conditions and what options are available, adding that police enforcement won't do it alone. 
 
Warren said that it is a two-part problem because drivers speed through the neighborhood and cause backup from the light. 
 
Ideally, he would like to get a report back and work on it in the spring. 
 
The commission also referred a petition from Ward 2 Councilor Charles Kronick to extend a "no parking" zone on Second Street to Morales and Shedd.
 
He would like to extend the "no parking" area about 200 feet to 208 Second Street from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. to accommodate a child with mobility issues who has difficulty getting off of the school bus when people park in the area. 
 

 


Tags: diagonal parking,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories