Letter: Scope & Timing Wrong for New Firehouse

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

As a high-schooler in central Mass., I occasionally helped our Volunteer Fire Dept. put out grass fires caused by the railroad, so I have some understanding of what these outstanding people do for us in Williamstown. And I’m confident everyone in town appreciates and values the work of our Volunteer Fire Department.

However, the current proposal to build a $23 million firehouse here in town is another story. The problem is with both the project’s scope and timing.

Let’s first look at the timing. The economy is roaring. Unemployment is down. Inflation is up (look at the price of eggs!). Interest rates are higher than they’ve been in a decade or more and likely to climb higher (the Federal Reserve Chairman says so). Building materials prices are in the stratosphere.

And we’re still paying for our new high school, elementary school, and police station. (Note: there are quiet rumblings that we also need to build a new Town Hall!)


Contrary to popular opinion not everyone in Williamstown is a well-to-do transplant. If we want to keep seniors, the middle-class, and working families in Williamstown – and resist becoming a Hollywood caricature of a town of wealthy second- or third-home owners – at the very least we should postpone a new firehouse until interest rates and building material prices settle back to normal.

Now, the project scope: The Fire District is proposing a grand traditional brick and mortar facility with a training center, when all we really need is a utilitarian structure. For instance, Greenfield, which is four times our size, is building a new firehouse with dormitory facilities for its full-time professional fire department for a $1 million less. At the very least Williamstown should be able to think outside the box to create a structure that uses new materials and creative design to meet the needs of our volunteer department for considerably less than $23 million.

Clearly, we shouldn’t be asking Williamstown seniors, middle-class, and working families to fund a traditional project of this scale while they still shoulder the burden of constructing two schools and a police station.

In 1960, JFK's father told him he was happy to fund his campaign, "but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for a landslide." Many of us feel the same about a new firehouse.

Lee Harrison
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee OKs Updated Policy on Seclusion, Restraint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee recently approved an updated policy on time-outs, seclusion and the physical restraint of students.
 
The policy is based on updated state regulations that came down last winter. Superintendent Joseph Bergeron told the panel at its August meeting that his office waited on recommendations from the Massachusetts Association of School Committees that were released in May and ran the proposed changes past the district's legal counsel.
 
That timing — and an expectation from the commonwealth that districts have the updated policy in place for the start of the 2026-27 academic year — led to an expedited process for the School Committee, which did not do a first read with a vote at a subsequent meeting as is its practice.
 
"Policy JKAA speaks to the ways the school district and our procedures shall abide by the updated state regulations," Bergeron said. "We're not going to have a lot of leeway.
 
"Nothing about the way we interact with our students on a day-to-day basis is being shifted by this."
 
For example, the commonwealth does not allow schools to use "seclusion," or, "the involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room or area, with or without adult supervision," except some extreme cases, like when, "when student behavior poses an imminent threat of assault, or imminent serious physical harm to self or others, but only if safeguards are accounted for," the updated policy reads.
 
"From the state's perspective and my perspective, the idea of locking a child in a room without adult supervision is something we've never done," Bergeron said. "And it's something the state wants to make explicitly that nobody ever does."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories