Pittsfield Board of Health Considering Local Nail Salon Regulations

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health is considering looking into a local regulation for nail salons.

Chair Bobbie Orsi recalled a conversation about 20 years ago about nail establishment regulations in regard to the chemicals used.

"It just never came around," she explained to the board on Wednesday. 

"So I thought it might be an interesting time to revisit it, given the fact that the department is fully staffed and we have additional resources and the risk for those workers has really not gone away."

Nail salons are currently overseen by the state.  

The establishments pay a $136 license fee to the Board of Registration of Cosmetology and Barbering and then have the premises inspected. A person who successfully completes at least 100 hours of professional training in manicuring at a manicuring school approved by the board can apply for an examination and licensure as a manicurist.

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi said that in reviewing other community's regulations, they seem in line with the state.

"It would give us more of an oversight in the local permitting process," he said. "I think there are enough in the city that it would work with the staff numbers that we have."

There are well more than 10 nail salons and hair salons that offer nail services in Pittsfield.

Cambi's question would be what the Health Department's role is. He said the city could do an evaluation of salons and check in with the state to see if it needs local assistance.

Pittsfield's authority would involve permitting the establishments on a yearly basis and ensuring that each of the nail technicians has a state license.  

"Obviously there is a state regulatory structure which must include some sort of compliance testing where they make certain that the places are in compliance with the state licensing requirements," board member Brad Gordon said.

"So I guess what I would want to know is what the value added is. I want to understand that better."



He added that he is not at all opposed but just wants to know more.

Orsi pointed out that the Boston Health Department educates nail salons on safe ventilation and the use of chemical products as a measure of employee safety.

"So it seems like an interesting idea," she said. "Again, we don't want to be redundant if there are systems in place that manage and do that but much like when we tackled the tattoo parlor regulation and kind of looked at that, it just seems like a population of workers that could be at risk."

She explained that she was opening it up as a topic for the board to think about and recognized that they have a steep learning curve on it. Orsi also suggested possibly inviting nail professionals and state overseers in to educate the board.

Board member Dr. Jeffrey Leppo said it would be good to get an understanding of what the regulatory measures were intended to do and if they would change anything given the chance.

He pointed to the board's fine-tuning of local tobacco amendments that adds regulations to state law to make sure that certain products don't slip through the cracks and into the community.

Though the emphasis had been placed on employee safety, the effort would be for customers as well.

Cambi reported that the city has received a few calls from customers throughout the years with concerns about nail salons and told them to reach out to the state as the licensing authority.

It was pointed out that a local regulation would impose an additional cost on owners. Gordon said this is always the balance of these regulatory processes and said it could be a good thing for businesses.

"I think the way we framed it for body art was that people could have a high degree of confidence in going to paces in Pittsfield that it was safe and that was something that they could use as part of their business advertising," he said.

"I do think that if people feel like in a community there is a good regulatory structure sometimes they can feel better about the establishments they are going to."


Tags: board of health,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Board Looks to Pontoosuc Island Safety and Cleanup

By Breanna Steele

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Friends of Pontoosuc cleaned up the two islands on the lake and shared concerns of what they saw.

Kevin McGinnis, Friends board member, spoke to the Select Board last week about how the cleanup went and erosion the group discovered.

"We particularly wanted to go out and take a peek at the islands and it was seven bags of garbage and a lot of refuse from geese that we actually removed from both islands," he said. "The Keeler Island, particularly in Lanesborough, that had a Sheetrock bucket full of nails that we actually removed from there, too, and that was from probably multiple years of pallet burning out there."

McGinnis added that there is significant erosion on the east side of the islands, facing the deepest part of the channel.

He said Lee Popovich, who knows horticulture, suggested plantings along the edges to hold the soil and filter runoff that may help with the E. coli outbreaks on the lake.

"These are things that we can discuss on trying to keep those islands in enjoyable shape, and for people to be able to enjoy," McGinnis said, by reducing risks such as geese deposits, and plantings that can help filter some of the debris.

"We can't control how hard our rain comes, but we can mitigate some of that filtering processes to keep bacteria count lower. Because if you notice, pretty much the E. coli breakouts that we do have are right after heavy rain."

He wants to help keep the islands safe and healthy. He introduced the cleanup group, saying the cleanup was enjoyable and those who volunteered help make a difference.

"Look forward to in the future bringing more information back, and with a lot of moving parts to talk about mitigating erosion and certain things," McGinnis said. "But it's something that we all need to be kind of aware of, and this body of water is so enjoyable, and we definitely want to try to keep it as healthy as possible, and keep control or keep an eye on certain things."

Select Board member Jason Breault asked about what the insurance is for the islands to which Town Administrator Gina Dario responded that the island is a public park, so it's covered the same way as other town land, like Glaston Park. There's no added liability.

Breault then asked from a patrol aspect what that means.

"Obviously, if we have an underage drinking party, we have no mechanism to address it, or if there's a medical emergency on that area, we would have to get a boat from Pittsfield, so obviously we have some sort of a delay there," Police Chief Rob Derksen said. "That's the only concern, I guess, is it's a park that we can't patrol and we can't regulate on a regular basis," 

Breault wondered if they could get funding for a boat down the line but Derksen said it would be difficult with his small force.

"That's pulling the thread on a sweater because then I have to have certified boat officers and, I mean, so that's training that's time away and then I would have to be able to actually put them on the boat, which again as you've heard me say a million times, most of the time I have one officer on duty so I can't split them in half and put half on a boat, half in a car, so it would be a challenge."

He added that the lake is patrolled by the state Environmental Police but with recent funding challenges, it's not that much.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories