Pittsfield Parks Commission Approves Draft MOU for Springside Pump Track

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — More than a year after the approval of a bike skills facility in Springside Park, the Parks Commission has approved a draft memorandum of understanding with its purveyors.

The New England Mountain Bike Association plans to place a bicycle skills park and pump track near the north playground of the park at no cost to the city.  

Since late 2021, Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resource Program Manager James McGrath and Commissioner Anthony DeMartino have been negotiating an MOU with NEMBA. The draft will go back to the organization, which can decide whether to accept or reject the terms.

"We seem to have come to an agreement on a number of issues and the last one that was outstanding was the matter about escrow funding for the removal," McGrath explained.

"If you recall that the city's first position on that was that the cost for the removal of the project would be developed as the project was designed. Whoever is designing it would put a price tag on the removal and our position initially was that money needs to be put aside in escrow and be able to be used at any point in the future when it was mutually agreed that the bike skills park would come offline and would be discontinued."

In further conversations, the city felt it was reasonable to request the full amount be carried over the course of many years. The parties came to an agreement that half of the initial cost is given back in a five-year period and the remaining 50 percent is given back in a 10-year period.

"The funds raised by NEMBA for the demo of the Bike Skills Park shall be held by the City in fund available to pay for the removal of the Bike Skills Park "the "Removal Fund). Fifty percent (50%) of the funds for removal shall be released to NEMBA or its designee on the 5th anniversary of the opening of the Bike Skills Park," the MOU states.

"The balance, if not expended for the removal of the Bike Skills Park shallowing be released to NEMBA or its designee on the 10th anniversary of the opening of the Bike Skills Park."

McGrath said this is a recognition that there will be wear and tear over time despite if it is being well-maintained.

"NEMBA had pushed back and said, 'Why should we be responsible for removing this city asset in perpetuity?'" he said. "And I think that resonated with us."

DeMartino said the MOU is multi-faceted, delineating the procurement process that must happen, outlining the responsibility for maintenance, and designating the responsibility for removal.

Given that the proposal involves a new facility, if it were to fall in disrepair or need to be removed on a level determined by the city, the MOU aims to ensure that portion of Springside Park can be returned to its prior state.



"The goal would be that should this fall under those categories and needs to be removed that we can return that land to field as it was," DeMartino said.

"And given the fact that this is proposed to be an asphalt structure in portion and earth ware and things on the earth ware that the city is in the position that within five years things should be fine, that's certainly well within its early life maintenance but you get into years five and ten then okay, are they really holding up their end of the bargain or is this not being maintained to city standards."

If the park goes for 10 years, NEMBA continues to maintain it, and the city decides to remove it then the cost will fall under the city's responsibility.

The MOU has been vetted by the city solicitor if there is an agreement from the other party it will be cleaned up and returned to the commission for final approval.

"What we have before us is the city's position on this memorandum of understanding with the NEMBA organization," DeMartino said. "It is effectively in their court to accept it."

This project has been on the table since 2020 and was officially approved at the end of 2021.

Opponents of the track have argued that it will destroy the natural beauty and ecology, create heavy traffic that would ruin the road and disrupt enjoyment of the park, and cause severe damage to a treasured natural resource in the heart of the city. They have urged the commission to reject or relocate the skills track.

Victor and Zura Capelli, who have regularly spoken against the proposal and mountain biking within Springside Park, are opposed to many parts of the MOU.

"The insurance policy needs to cover the cost of vandalism because who will pay the premium for the property insurance to cover theft and vandalism," she said.

"It will be a very bitter pill to swallow when bike tracks and pickleball courts are going up and the homeless in Pittsfield remain unhoused. Living under a tree in Springside Park, someone will walk out of their tent and say, 'Gee, I'm living under a tree and bike pump tracks and pickleball courts are going up.'"
 

NEMBA Bike Skills Park MOU by Brittany Polito


Tags: biking,   Springside Park,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories