image description
Councilors are frustrated by the conditions in the downtown with scraggly overgrown medians.
image description
Weeds growing up through the pavers in the median. The council is calling for action.

Pittsfield Council Airs Frustrations With Overgrown Ways

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

A company was contracted to maintain the medians and borders but has apparently not been able to do so.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — City councilors are appalled at the condition of some public ways and have called for action.

On Tuesday, the council sent multiple petitions to the Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales concerning walkways, medians and planter boxes that appear to be lacking maintenance.

These include a request to have the center median and all adjacent flower boxes from the intersection of Reed Street and South Street to the intersection of Linden Street and North Street cleared of all debris; a request for information on the schedule of emptying garbage cans in the downtown business district and garbage along sidewalks, planters, roadways, and the trimming of weeds; and a request to have all crosswalks painted and solar flashing signs with a crossing signal installed.

There has reportedly been an issue with the contractor who is responsible for city grooming.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III was especially frustrated with the situation.

"This continues to be a problem in the city. I don't know why we can't take care of these simple activities that should take place every year," he said. "The excuse of a contractor not performing, not doing it, is not acceptable. Our downtown looks atrocious."

Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey hopes that after the areas are cleared, the city will consider replanting species that are easier to maintain.

"With the point about our contractors not being able to get out there and do the work, I understand that we've had a tough time with contractors but we've never had a crew go out and at least clean up the road and cut down all the weeds and the brush and everything else that's just not looking great," he said.

Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi gave a shout-out to the volunteer organization Pittsfield Beautiful for its work to make the downtown welcoming and aesthetically pleasing.

"So much of the beauty that we do see is because of them," she said. "We can't do it all on a volunteer basis."

Persip said these items are easy to get done and should not require answers through petitions.  He petitioned last month for answers about crosswalk painting and is not happy that crosswalks near schools are still not done.


"It's frustrating. It's getting old. We are concentrating on the wrong things," he said. "We are fixing our siding on the house when the porch is falling down. We need to address these simple things."

He said councilors are emailing "over and over again" and hopes that this is a wake-up call.

Kavey pointed out there is also a Highway Department adding that "for them to go out for an afternoon and just weed whack the center of the road is not asking that much of their department."

Lampiasi said she hates sending such emails and coming down on workers but when councilors are told something isn't happening, it should happen.

"And we are now two months and it still hasn't happened. That is a problem," she said. "I don't know where the breakdown is but we're talking about sanitation issues."

Some councilors were upset that Morales was no longer at the meeting when the petitions were discussed.  While Councilor at Large Peter White said hears his colleagues' frustrations, he said the council has to have something solid in place that communicates when city staff should be at meetings.

The petition concerning crosswalk painting on West Street was referred to Morales and the Traffic Commission. It was originally directed only toward the crosswalk in front of Dorothy Amos Park where, earlier this year, resident Shaloon Milord was struck and killed.

"Low-hanging fruit," Persip said. "Paint the crosswalk. We're leaving low-hanging fruit out there. It's easy enough to take the crosswalk."

Lampiasi said most of the councilors would likely be willing to take a roller and paint the crosswalks themselves.

Before the petition was amended, she cautioned against prioritizing one over the rest, as there are safety issues with crosswalks all over the city and especially near schools.

"We have other high priorities and they all need to be hit at the same time," she said.


Tags: beautification,   North Street,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories