image description
Preliminary designs for Dalton Division Road are recommending a multimodal path on the Pittsfield side and no sidewalks on the Dalton side. That has Dalton, which is paying for the engineering, questioning its value for the town.

Dalton Officials Question Value of Dalton Division Road Designs

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board questioned the value the proposed preliminary designs of Dalton Division Road have for residents during its December meeting.
 
Steve Savaria, project manager and senior traffic engineer at Fuss & O'Neil, presented some preliminary concepts for the redesign of the roadway and intersection.
 
The New England engineering firm has been retained as the town's design consultant for this project. 
 
The project comes with challenges surrounding wetlands, state Department of Transportation requirements, and easements. To be fully compliant with MassDOT standards, the design has to include sidewalks on both sides of the road.
 
The sidewalks would have a significant impact to wetlands and private properties and issues with slopes all throughout the corridor. 
 
"We don't believe [this option] is feasible at this point," Savaria said. 
 
"So the other alternative that we have is to consolidate the bicycle and pedestrian facilities on the west side of the road in a 10-foot shared-use path and then not have sidewalks on the east side of the road to avoid the wetlands impacts that are on that side." 
 
This alternative would require that the town go through a design exception process with MassDOT.
 
But the west side of Dalton Division is in Pittsfield. 
 
"This is a problem. This is a major problem for the town of Dalton and our residents because we're funding the money for this engineering study and now we're not gonna get the value of sidewalks on our side in Dalton and Pittsfield is paying nothing to this," Select Board Chair Joseph Diver said. 
 
Diver also noted that this is a concern that Select Board member John Boyle has raised numerous times. 
 
The town has already paved the road for $300,000, which also benefited Pittsfield. 
 
Diver and Boyle agreed that Pittsfield should pay at least half the cost of the project because it benefits the city just as much as Dalton, if not more if there would only be sidewalks on the Pittsfield side. 
 
The board agreed to advocate for Concept A, which would have sidewalks on both sides, a 5-foot bike lane in the road on both sides with a buffer, and a 2-foot painted buffer between the vehicle lane and in the bike lane. They also recommended the two-way stop control option. 
 
"[Concept A] adds a million and a half to the cost, or a little less, but relative to their $2 million project, it's 10 percent of the cost," Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. 
 
Although the town can advocate for the design it wants, it is up to MassDOT as to which concept will be constructed. The construction is advertised for fiscal year 2028 but may change based on the yearly regional tip prioritization, Savaria said. 
 
The regional Metropolitan Planning Organization and MassDOT have endorsed this project for application of state and federal funding for construction. 
 
The construction of the project will not cost the town but it is responsible for funding the engineering at about $800,000, in addition to easement costs. 
 
There is someone at MassDOT responsible for relationships between the two municipalities, Hutcheson said.
 
This project was authorized for funding in 2016 by the MPO but was pushed down the Transportation Improvement Plan list because of incomplete engineering. The easement costs were not included in the original authorization. 
 
The "project fell through the cracks during a previous administration" but has since been revitalized with the addition of a sewer line
 
The designs for the roadway do not have any permanent taking of land on the Pittsfield side but there will be construction easements, temporary easements, along the whole west side of the project, Savaria said.
 
"So, I believe that would be a point of negotiation with the city of Pittsfield about who would be responsible for acquiring because those rights would be acquired in Pittsfield," he said.
 
"... the entire roadway is within Dalton. It's only the abutting properties that are in Pittsfield. So, I would say that's a good question and we should try and try and get an answer for that." 
 
Constructing sidewalks on the east side would require constructing retaining walls along significant stretches of the roadway where there are adjacent wetlands. The alternatives that avoid wetlands would present the smallest impact. 
 
In addition to the roadway, the project would look at redesigns of the intersection off Williams Street, Washington Mountain Road and Mountain Road to improve safety.
 
There are currently two alternatives for the intersection design, a roundabout and a two-way stop control. 
 
MassDOT requires that one of the intersection designs include a roundabout, which would require a permanent fee taking. 
 
The existing roadway already crosses private property so that would need to be corrected no matter what but there would be about 6,000 square feet of the lot on the corner where Shire Donuts is located.  
 
Some of the construction of the intersection will take place over the line onto Williams Street so MassDOT does view this project as being in both municipalities, Savaria said.  
 
The other alternative is the two-way stop control that does not include the need for a permanent fee taking.   
 
"We do move the intersection over kind of away from that side of the property from that corner because there's more room on the other side and also we wanted to avoid this property on the corner of Williams Street because that house is very close to the road," Savaria said.
 
There are a lot of unknowns surrounding the project, Diver said. The only thing he said they do know is that the town may be responsible for the cost of temporary easements for a project that might not benefit town residents. 
 
If MassDOT chooses the roundabout option, the town could also be responsible for the "land grab." 

Tags: road project,   sidewalks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories