DALTON, Mass. — The Dalton Division Road project has moved down on the Transportation Improvement Plan list and construction is now projected to start in 2027.
Joseph Diver, Select Board chairman and Dalton representative to the Transportation Advisory Committee, informed the board of the project's new placement on the list at Monday night's meeting.
Diver went to the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission's TAC meeting last week in an effort to secure the project's place on the list. But he said it became clear during the meeting that it is unlikely the project was going to get support from other committee members because Pittsfield has three other projects the members are not willing to risk by moving the Dalton Division project up the list.
"It was clear it was not gonna get the support from other TAC members to win a vote to move us up," he said. "It was clear that, God bless Pittsfield, and they got a lot coming up, but they have, I think, three other projects on that TAC list, which I don't think they were going to risk by moving us up either."
The Mount Washington Road project is likely to move ahead of the Dalton Division Road project on the list. The committee's reasoning for dropping the project further down the list is that it is not ready compared to other projects that have 25 percent of design.
Diver argued that this is still good news because the project has not been removed from the list completely, which was a possibility, and that this will give the town more time to complete the engineering and the rights-of-way but that it does require the board to look at the cost of maintaining the road.
That scenario, the second of four possible options, is expected to go before the Metropolitan Planning Commission.
Diver has been working with Highway Superintendent Edward Hall on furthering the road project.
"My opinion, the good news is we're still on the list, because it could have dropped us completely. The good is that we're on the list. The bad is that now we're looking at 2027-28. The other good is like it's more time to do the engineering and the right of way," Diver said. "The bad is that we have to then look at the maintenance of the road."
Hall had an engineer look at Dalton Division Road who determined that it is not going to survive another six years as it stands now. After measuring the width and length, a contractor estimated that — based on the price of blacktop — it will cost $330,000 for repairs.
This estimate surprised Hall, as he was expecting that it was going to be a lot more and that the town has the money in Chapter 90 road funding. They discussed potentially holding off on a couple of other less crucial projects to get this one completed.
"We do have the money in Chapter 90 for me to do that," Hall said. "I know there are some other roads we put through the [Franklin Regional Council of Governments purchasing group], which I'll find out in May how that's gonna work out and if we have to bump one of those other little streets off to do that, because obviously, that's a major road coming in and out of town."
Board members mentioned having Pittsfield pay for half of the cost since it has a bigger budget and half the road is on the city's side but Hall mentioned that Pittsfield paved Hubbard Avenue, which is located in Dalton, but that Dalton has not yet helped Pittsfield.
The board discussed what projects could be put on hold to accommodate the Dalton Division Road repairs and brought up Orchard Road because although it is in need of repair, there are a lot of issues that need to be addressed such as the engineering and drainage.
The town approved money a couple years ago to do the drainage but it has not yet been spent. Hall and Town Planner Grant McGregor also applied for a grant so that the town can start working on the drainage issues with Orchard Road and hope to start the project in March or April this year.
"I have all the intentions to take care of that road, because that's probably the worst one in town," Hall said.
Select Board members agreed that it is important that these roads get proper funding so the repairs can be made and that over the years, many towns, not just Dalton, have let them slide.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more