Dalton Traffic Commission Comments on Dalton Division Designs

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. —  The Traffic Commission weighed in last week on the preliminary design options for Dalton Division Road that were presented last month.
 
The commission's discussion focused on the sewer line, sidewalks, and intersection of Williams Street, Washington Mountain Road and Mountain Road. 
 
Some commissioners felt that installing a sewer line on the Dalton side and not include the city if Pittsfield is "silly" because of the cost of the cost and future ramifications it could have. 
 
"It seems rather silly to me to put a line down the Dalton side of the road and not include the city of Pittsfield in that same area," Chair William Drosehn said. 
 
The cost of the project is in the neighborhood of $5 million. Not providing Pittsfield residents the opportunity to tap into the sewer line could pose an issue in the future if Pittsfield expresses an interest in putting a line down on its side which would require the road to be torn up again.
 
Commissioner Camillus. B. Cachat Jr. agreed, adding that if Pittsfield residents were to choose to tap into the sewer line the town could charge them. 
 
The construction will not cost the town but it is responsible for funding the engineering at about $800,000, in addition to easement costs. 
 
This project was authorized for funding in 2016 by the Metropolitan Planning Organization but was pushed down the Transportation Improvement Plan list because of incomplete engineering. The easement costs were not included in the original authorization. 
 
The "project fell through the cracks during a previous administration" but has since been revitalized with the addition of a sewer line. 
 
The Select Board in December grudgingly agreed to advocate for the concept that would have sidewalks on both sides, a 5-foot bike lane in the road on both sides with a buffer, and a 2-foot painted buffer between the vehicle lane and in the bike lane. The board also recommended the two-way stop control option. 
 
Although the Select Board voted to recommend the two-way stop control option, some commissioners felt the roundabout was "a better alternative." 
 
The roundabout would help lower the amount of fuel and carbon that blows into the air, which is a problem with the two-way stop control due to idling cars, Drosehn said. 
 
The type of roundabout proposed is not a safe alternative, Commissioner Adelard Nadeau said and that
the size should be determined by entrance and exits because the smaller the roundabout the more dangerous it is for drivers. 
 
If the roundabout entrances and exits are too small then the drivers are coming in and exiting too close together, he said. The larger roundabouts are not being considered. 
 
Nadeau also expressed his apprehension of having sidewalks on both sides because the town will not collect tax dollars for putting them on the Pittsfield side. 
 
Installing sidewalks on the Dalton side would have a significant impact on wetlands, private properties, and issues with slopes all throughout the corridor. 
 
The Select Board heavily questioned the value the proposed preliminary designs of Dalton Division Road have for residents  during the December meeting. 
 
More information on the Select Board decision to recommend the sidewalks on both side and two-way stop control option here
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories