Dalton Traffic Commission Comments on Dalton Division Designs

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. —  The Traffic Commission weighed in last week on the preliminary design options for Dalton Division Road that were presented last month.
 
The commission's discussion focused on the sewer line, sidewalks, and intersection of Williams Street, Washington Mountain Road and Mountain Road. 
 
Some commissioners felt that installing a sewer line on the Dalton side and not include the city if Pittsfield is "silly" because of the cost of the cost and future ramifications it could have. 
 
"It seems rather silly to me to put a line down the Dalton side of the road and not include the city of Pittsfield in that same area," Chair William Drosehn said. 
 
The cost of the project is in the neighborhood of $5 million. Not providing Pittsfield residents the opportunity to tap into the sewer line could pose an issue in the future if Pittsfield expresses an interest in putting a line down on its side which would require the road to be torn up again.
 
Commissioner Camillus. B. Cachat Jr. agreed, adding that if Pittsfield residents were to choose to tap into the sewer line the town could charge them. 
 
The construction will not cost the town but it is responsible for funding the engineering at about $800,000, in addition to easement costs. 
 
This project was authorized for funding in 2016 by the Metropolitan Planning Organization but was pushed down the Transportation Improvement Plan list because of incomplete engineering. The easement costs were not included in the original authorization. 
 
The "project fell through the cracks during a previous administration" but has since been revitalized with the addition of a sewer line. 
 
The Select Board in December grudgingly agreed to advocate for the concept that would have sidewalks on both sides, a 5-foot bike lane in the road on both sides with a buffer, and a 2-foot painted buffer between the vehicle lane and in the bike lane. The board also recommended the two-way stop control option. 
 
Although the Select Board voted to recommend the two-way stop control option, some commissioners felt the roundabout was "a better alternative." 
 
The roundabout would help lower the amount of fuel and carbon that blows into the air, which is a problem with the two-way stop control due to idling cars, Drosehn said. 
 
The type of roundabout proposed is not a safe alternative, Commissioner Adelard Nadeau said and that
the size should be determined by entrance and exits because the smaller the roundabout the more dangerous it is for drivers. 
 
If the roundabout entrances and exits are too small then the drivers are coming in and exiting too close together, he said. The larger roundabouts are not being considered. 
 
Nadeau also expressed his apprehension of having sidewalks on both sides because the town will not collect tax dollars for putting them on the Pittsfield side. 
 
Installing sidewalks on the Dalton side would have a significant impact on wetlands, private properties, and issues with slopes all throughout the corridor. 
 
The Select Board heavily questioned the value the proposed preliminary designs of Dalton Division Road have for residents  during the December meeting. 
 
More information on the Select Board decision to recommend the sidewalks on both side and two-way stop control option here
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories