North Adams Finance Committee Finalizing New Fee Schedule

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The Finance Committee is hoping to finally complete a years-long effort to consolidate and update fees and fines that have been scattered throughout the city's ordinances. 
 
Department heads have been consulted and ordinances scoured to pull out fees and list them in an appendix. This will allow the amounts to be updated without having to change an ordinance and will clarify the correct fee when in some cases it was not updated or found in more than one place in the ordinances.
 
"This is probably in the 30 years I've sat on council, definitely this is the biggest ordinance project the council has worked on," said Chair Keith Bona, who had also served on the council in the 1990s. "There were numerous committees working on it, there were numerous departments working on it."
 
The work had also been delayed during the pandemic and changes in administration and council. 
 
Now all the fees and fines will be located in one place, Appendix D, which will be the reference in all ordinances. 
 
The changes were sent to the solicitor in the fall, who came back with suggestions and recommendations that the committee reviewed on Monday. It will meet again next Wednesday, hopefully with the solicitor and mayor, to finalize the appendix. 
 
The committee also found a couple changes that need to be made, including updates from the city clerk on outdated language. For example, the secondhand dealer ordinance has been repealed so that fee no longer applies.
 
One aspect that concerned the solicitor was if some of the penalties did not align with Massachusetts General Law. 
 
"I know that the changes are referred to fines for violations as well as fees. In my opinion, the proposed changes to remove the penalties for violations of ordinances from specific sections in congregate them in Appendix D are in proper form," Bona read from the solicitor's communication. "However, I recommend the Council review the following items prior to the proposed change."
 
For instance, he wrote, the city has the authority to impose noncriminal penalties but state law requires a specific penalty be established for issuing noncriminal tickets to ensure they remain valid. He noted that the city has fines exceeding $300 that he did not think could be enforced because state law has set $300 as a cap for enforcement. 
 
"This is specifically for things that could technically be criminal violations, but instead of going to court, we can issue fines instead," noted member Ashley Shade. "I'm looking at some of these numbers, Chapter 15b 'dumping' fines $500 or maximum allowed by law. That is something that we would want to take out of here or that allow us to go to court for. I think that's where the solicitor is getting at.
 
The committee discussed whether it would be useful to tier such fines so the city would have the opportunity to take someone to court if it so desires. It was one of the questions they should ask the solicitor, said Shade.
 
"If it's that egregious they should have to pay $500. Perhaps that is something that should go to criminal court," she said. "Maybe it's not as egregious as we think and we should just cap it at $300."
 
In another case, the city had set most parking infractions at a maximum of $50 but the MGL law it had adopted in 1981 set the max at $25. The solicitor recommended that the council confirm its adoption of that since amended statute prior to ratifying the fee schedule. 
 
Shade also noted that some the fines were higher for violations of Americans with Disabilities Acts but others that could be construed as violations, such as blocking access for parking on a sidewalk, were not. Bona said it should also be higher for blocking a fire hydrant as well. 
 
"I think we should look at that. If the solicitor agrees with us, I think we should implement something," she said. 
 
The committee, with Council President Bryan Sapienza attending, also briefly discussed some violations that did not have fines, such as failing to clear a sidewalk, and questioned other fines such as leaving your keys in your car. 
 
Bona asked the committee to read through the schedule and the solicitor's communication to prepare any questions for next week's meeting. 

Tags: fees,   Finance Committee,   fines,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Let's Prioritize Investment in Public Education in Massachusetts

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Across the 1st Berkshire District, our schools face a unique set of challenges. Declining enrollment, rising transportation costs, workforce shortages, increasing special education expenses, and growing student mental health needs are placing significant pressure on local districts and taxpayers alike.

We need to continue to strengthen the connections between our primary schools, higher education institutions, career training programs, and local employers so that more young people can build successful futures right here in the Berkshires. Whether it's early college programming that has been spearheaded and highly successful right here in the 1st Berkshire District with MCLA, new trades training like the HVAC program at McCann, or the high demand certifications and trainings in healthcare now being built and operated at BCC, MCLA, and within our K-12 system. Each of these represents an example of how we do things well right here in our region, and lays the groundwork for how we can continue to advance educational support.

A strong public education system is directly connected to housing, childcare, transportation, workforce development, and economic opportunity. If we want to retain young families, attract new residents, and build a stronger regional economy, we must continue investing in educational excellence at every level.

I support continued and enhanced investment in public education, career and technical education, and early childhood education. I also support policies that recognize the unique challenges facing rural and small-city districts, particularly around transportation funding, the imbalance of special education costs and state funding formulas, and educator recruitment and retention. When local students' needs change, we need to be aggressive in advocating and designing policies that remain agile to the cost-of-service impacts and be willing to change existing practices such as the Chapter 70 funding formula. Together, we need to foster a culture of equitable education investment that lifts up our students and families, not one that measures their value based on standardized tests that have proven to be determined more heavily by median household income, and not the quality of our educators, the commitment of our students or the support of our communities.

Every student deserves a pathway to success, whether that pathway leads to a college classroom, a skilled trade, military service, entrepreneurship, or a career right here in the Berkshires. As your State Representative, I will work collaboratively with educators, families, school leaders, higher education institutions, workforce partners, and state agencies to make sure that the Berkshires have a strong voice in shaping the future of education policy in Massachusetts, and will ensure that our communities get the tailored support we need and deserve.

Sincerely,

Andrew Fitch
North Adams, Mass. 

Candidate for state representative, 1st Berkshire District

 

 

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories