image description
Quentin Palfrey, state director of federal funds and infrastructure, opens a presentation by the Federal Funds and Infrastructure Office. This was the first of 12 presentations to be held across the state.
image description
Local officials and administrators were on hand for the presentation Monday afternoon at the Berkshire Innovation Center.
image description
Director of Rural Affairs Anne Gobi urges communities to keep her in the loop when applying for funding so her office can also provide support.

Mass Federal Funding Office Starts Outreach in Berkshires

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Jonathan Schrag, deputy climate chief in the Office of Climate Innovation and Resilience, speaks about federal funding opportunities for clean energy.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshires were the Healey-Driscoll administration's first stop in federal funds outreach.

On Monday, the Federal Funds and Infrastructure Office held a community roadshow at the Berkshire Innovation Center.  At the first of 12 statewide sessions, attendees were briefed on the office's effort to support communities in leveraging monies from the federal government.

The state has brought in nearly $9 billion in federal dollars is year and Berkshire County, rich in collaboration but not always funding, wants to ensure its share of the pot.

"When Governor [Maura] Healey came into office last January, one of her day one commitments was to ensure that we were being strategic and aggressive and leaving no stone unturned in terms of making sure that we seize these opportunities and direct new resources to committees all across Massachusetts," said Quentin Palfrey, director of federal funds and infrastructure.

"The way that she thought about pulling this together was in the first instance, through an executive order. So she signed an executive order, she created a new whole-of-government effort that was focused on leveraging these new federal resources to accomplish a really ambitious set of priorities across the administration."

He identified the federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the Inflation Reduction Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and the American Rescue Plan Act as a "really extraordinary moment in American History" for investing in infrastructure. Collectively, these represent trillions of dollars.

The county saw nearly $6 million in federal funds, including $4.67 million to the Berkshire Regional Transit Authority through the Low or No Emissions Grant Program for hybrid buses; nearly $199,000 to the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission; and more than $310,000 for Pittsfield in Safe Streets and Roads for All funding; and another $750,700 to North Adams through the Reconnecting Communities Pilot program for rural planning.

The newly created office consistently heard that communities want to bring in federal funds but struggle with jargon, various silos, overwhelming nuances, and a lack of resources to match the applications.

"The Berkshires is a place where we are collaboration rich and we tend to be match poor," 1Berkshire's Vice President of Economic Development Benjamin Lamb articulated to a room of nodding heads.

The Federal Funds Partnership, led by the FFIO, meets every month. Palfrey explained it as an effort to ensure these opportunities are accessible and digestible and that a bridge is provided between experts within the federal and state governments to unlock resources.

Monthly emails digest opportunities that the partnership feels are most actionable and the partnership hosts an hour-long Zoom meeting including subject matter experts, which he reported is often attended by hundreds of people.

The statewide community tour is a way for the office to supplement the visual engagement and hear from residents and stakeholders in-person. It began on the westernmost end of the state.

"We decided to come to Berkshires first because we really, really care about this area and really appreciate our partners out here helping us organize this," Palfrey said.

The state has a $9 billion "rainy day" fund that accrues a significant amount of interest and Healey has dedicated three years of the interest to support competing for federal grants. Less than two months ago, the federal match legislation was signed into law after being passed unanimously by the House and Senate.


This allocates $750 million for federal matching funds, $50 million for financial assistance, and $12 million for technical assistance.  

"Our hope is that this can really breathe life into a lot of these local projects," Palfrey explained.

Lamb said the accessibility of the FFIO goes above and beyond when it comes to federal opportunities.  
Last year, 1Berkshire applied for the U.S Economic Development Administration's Build to Scale program and was not accepted. With help from the office, the organization was able to apply this year with more gumption and a hopeful positive outcome.

"They obviously have to do their due diligence, but they really did want to work with us. They wanted to make sure that they're spreading these resources equitably across the state, that they're taking everything into consideration," Lamb said.

"If you have a really good case statement to make, they are there to help you, whether it's the technical assistance or it's the actual seeking of dollars to put towards your application and again, this tackles those perennial issues that, especially in rural communities like we have here in Berkshires around not being able to come up with local match either from our municipalities or from our private sector. This is a huge tool in the toolbox now that, until recently, we didn't have that gas in the tank."

Jonathan Schrag, deputy climate chief in the Office of Climate Innovation and Resilience, spoke about Direct Pay. Under the Inflation Reduction Act, tax-exempt and government agencies can receive as much as the full value of a clean energy project through tax credits.

"Bottom line, the IRA has created a new program to deliver cash refunds to municipalities in the state for certain clean energy projects," Schrag explained.

"You get the projects done, you file a new form, you get 30 to 40 percent of the money back."

The most common credit is the Investment Tax Credit, which is calculated on a base credit of 6 percent on the investment basis of the project. Low-income communities can receive a 10 percent to 20 percent bonus and energy communities get a 10 percent bonus.

"Beginning in 2026, assuming that there would be a change, that the IRA might be revoked the first day of the new administration. If that were to happen, then that would most likely, and every conventional legal analysis says, the earliest that could take effect would be Jan 1, 2026, the next tax year," Schrag clarified.

During the Q&A portion, representatives from rural communities expressed concern over accessing federal funds. Director of Rural Affairs Anne Gobi urged these communities to keep her in the loop when applying for funding.

"If you're thinking of applying for a grant, make sure you let me know too because it's really helpful so that we can give some extra support from our office," she said.

"And just to make sure that Quentin and his team know about it as well, regardless of what it is, if it's a federal grant or not, let me know so that we can be there to be supportive to you."


Tags: federal funds,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories