image description
Superintendent Joseph Curtis speaks at Monday's meeting of the Middle School Restructuring Committee.

Pittsfield to Decide Crosby/Conte Feasibility Study in October

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — City and school officials are expected to vote on a feasibility study for the Crosby Elementary School rebuild by Halloween.

On Monday, Superintendent Joseph Curtis gave an overview of the study's timeline and components. It would determine the feasibility of rebuilding Conte Community School and Crosby on the West Street site with shared facilities.

"We at this point, do not know the feasibility study will actually occur," he told the Middle School Restructuring Committee.

"There has to be discussions of the School Building Needs Commission, who is actually meeting [Tuesday night], there has to be discussion with the School Committee, and then finally, approval by the City Council by roughly Oct. 31 to fund the feasibility study."

The study, estimated to cost about $1.5 million, is a part of the 80 percent reimbursable costs from the Massachusetts School Building Authority, which accepted the project into its queue late last year.

The Crosby/Conte plan has the potential to house grades prekindergarten to first grade in one school and Grades 2 to 4 in another, with both maintaining their own identities and administrations.

Curtis explained that what begins now is a 270-day timeline with a "whole host of tasks" that have to be completed in that window.

"The Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) Feasibility Study is a key phase in the process of addressing the needs of public school buildings in Massachusetts. It is a collaborative effort between the MSBA and the participating school district to identify the most appropriate and cost-effective solution to a school facility problem," an overview provided by the Pittsfield Public Schools explains.

"The Feasibility Study ensures that the district and the MSBA have a well-researched and collaborative plan for addressing the school facility's needs. It provides a framework for designing a solution that signs with education goals, meets community expectations, and is financially responsible."

Curtis pointed to bullet points in the overview that address education program development and evaluation of alternatives.  

The district needs to develop an Educational Program Plan that includes space requirements, program offerings, curriculum goals, and enrollment projections. Multiple options are to be considered including the renovation of the existing building, renovation with an addition, full replacement of the school building, and other potential solutions.



The project is centered around Crosby and the assessments would be done on its site.

Last year, the district conducted an extensive study of the district with DRA architects that included attendance zones and grade spans. This was in preparation to submit a statement of interest for Crosby and shares similarities with the feasibility study.

"This feasibility study will re-suggest some of the things you're looking at right now, could there be different options, different possibilities?" Curtis explained.

"You've seen in the past, our study suggested hopefully reducing to three attendance zones with dual campuses for each at elementary school. That might be a recommendation of this feasibility study, it might not."

Running parallel to the Crosby proposal are the efforts of the Middle School Restructuring Committee, which is expected to put recommendations in front of the School Committee next month. It has been researching grade spans and data outcomes, educational models for middle-year grade spans, and reviewing current district policies that will be affected by any grade span change.

While the Crosby project is not under the restructuring committee's purview, the efforts coincide.

"Recommendations could range from something specific to a delay in the timeline, additional study," Curtis said.

He explained that the original intention of the restructuring was to coincide with the opening of the new building but the School Committee felt it needed to be researched and addressed sooner.

The Crosby/Conte build would not be expected to be completed until 2029.


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Looks to Another Year of Fare Free

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The BRTA is expecting another year of fare free rides.

Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Administrator Kathleen Lambert told the advisory board recently that she expects to receive $1.3 million in state funding to remain fare free. She said RTAs may be given up to $40 million this year statewide, which is $5 million up from last year.

While the state budget is not formally approved yet, the effect will take place on July 1.

The news came at the same time the board approved the BRTA's budget of $13.6 million, which is an increase of 11 percent since last fiscal year.

Some of the increases were in the fixed route area which jumped from $9 million to $12 million. Lambert said this is due to the contractual agreement between the union where they have a five percent raise for all of the drivers and other union members, as well as a seven percent raise for paratransit fleet operators.

Lambert said much of the costs raised were fuel costs because of the ongoing war in Iran. The authority uses about 8,000 gallons of fuel a month and has planned for $5.75 per gallon.

The customer service desk, which currently staffs two employees, will be shut down, she said. The two employees were given notice months in advance and one showed interest in becoming a bus driver and will plan to interview for that. Lambert said two new drivers have started and that the new transit company Keolis, which is taking over for Transdev, will continue to hold recruiting events. The new manager is Mark Moujabber, taking over for Bobby Quintos. 

Lambert told the board she believed there are discrepancies in ridership data. Deputy Administrator Benjamin Hansen, who was in operations before his current role, said the authority has been seeing low ridership because of route cancellations, however, this past month, the numbers did not make sense as demand has stayed the same but ridership seemed exponentially low.

To get the figures, bus drivers must manually push a button on the farebox to record passengers, wheelchairs, and bikes, which might have errors. There are automatic passenger counters (APCs) installed, but they are not certified, so are only used as a rough comparison tool as they are not accurate.

Board member Stuart Lawrence asked if there has been any investigation on if this might be deliberate. Hansen said there is not as he does not know how they could watch for that to happen.

Lambert said she has been working with professor Paula Consolini at Williams College, who will have a group of samplers who will ride the bus and gather a week's worth of data.

In the last meeting, the board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, and a letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.  

Multiple employees had also signed on to a vote of no confidence letter in the BRTA administration spearheaded by Raymond Killeen who is a bus driver and represents Cheshire on the advisory board. Killeen said losing Quintos was hard, stating he was an excellent general manager and not having him there led to hardships on accomplishing many things.

"Once the removal was there, it was difficult to accomplish certain things, because we had lost the general manager. So, the letter was an attempt to get things moving a little bit quicker, so we could provide a better service for the residents of Berkshire County. I don't know if it accomplished that. We were able to do some things, though, but the concern amongst rank and file here is that we're not providing the best service we possibly could, and we're hoping that when the new management team comes in, that can be accomplished," Killeen said.

Killeen said he was unhappy with the progress to a revised driver schedule. The day after the meeting, Lambert and the team had a meeting to discuss and negotiate run schedules, Lambert said it was a very good and productive meeting.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories