Pittsfield OKs $226M Budget for FY26

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council passed a $226 million "best that they could" budget for fiscal year 2026

On Tuesday, the unanimous vote was taken quickly after four nights of departmental budget hearings over the last month. The $226,246,942 spending plan is a nearly 4.8 percent increase from the previous year and includes cost savings from the new trash system and smaller school appropriation. 

"There are a lot of positives, and so if the vote goes the same as it did in the committee, this could be a unanimous vote. Some people aren't going to be happy about that, but like I said, it's one of the lowest increases we've had in recent years," Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren said. 

"And I think all of us up here, the mayor and all of us up here, department heads, obviously they had to work with the mayor to come up with a budget, made a significant effort to do the best that they could." 

He said the last two fiscal years' budget increases have been less than the previous administration. The FY24 increase was 8.9 percent, and the FY25 increase was about five percent. 

"We have cut back, and what some of the public doesn't know is that there's been some things that have reduced the budget that they may not see. It's been stated in the budget sessions, but some people in the public who may not have watched those or watched this meeting might not know, for example, that we had a decent savings in the recycling budget," Warren said. 

"You might not see that because when we save money there, if there's increases in salaries in a contract or something else in another department, that money gets taken up. So, to the public, when they look at the budget, they might not see the recycling savings, but we did that, and it looks like we're on a path to save additional monies next year. That was a win-win for the city." 

The Department of Public Services saw a $600,000 reduction in solid waste disposal due to the city’s new system that utilizes 48-gallon toters for waste and recycling. Councilors also approved $2 million in free cash for street improvements, which Warren pointed out doesn’t need to be raised through the tax rate. 



"There was a decrease in what we contributed to the school budget, not because we're giving them less money, but there were some modifications of the amount of money they contributed to city expenses that we pay for them," he added. 

"Once again, that's a cost savings that the public may not see." 

Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso thanked city officials and department heads for attending the budget sessions, "Because it makes a difference." 

The only non-unanimous budget votes on Tuesday were for the water and sewer rates, which Warren, Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn, and Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey voted against. 

Their colleagues approved a 7 percent water rate increase and a 6 percent sewer rate increase based on a 4.40 percent Consumer Price Index Factor. The water rate is based on a 2.60 percent Operational Stability Factor, and the sewer rate on a 1.60 percent OSF.

This raises the typical two-bathroom house's bill about $70 annually, from $1,097 per year to $1,168 per year. For the average metered four-member household, it rises less than $50 from about $734 to $781 per year.

The council also approved: 

  • An order to borrow $7,016,000.00 for Enterprise Fund Capital Expenditures for FY26
  • An order to borrow $9,727,000.00 for General Fund Capital Expenditures for FY26
  • An order appropriating $340,350.00 for parking-related expenditures
  • An order amending Order 56 of the series of 2024, appropriating the amount of $526,548.70 for the FY26 Community Preservation Fund Budget
  • An order appropriating the amount of $526,548.70 from the Fiscal Year 2025 Community Preservation Fund Budget
  • An order appropriating the amount of $500,458.00 from the Fiscal Year 2026 Community Preservation Fund Budget

Tags: fiscal 2026,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories