Pittsfield Sues PathogenX for Repayment of GE Funds

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is suing a medical waste company for repayment of GE Economic Development funds. 

A lawsuit filed on June 13 says PathogenX "failed to establish actual and ongoing operations in the City of Pittsfield and furthermore failed to register with the Secretary of the Commonwealth to conduct business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts." 

In April, the city ordered the company to repay $70,000 that has been disbursed under the $150,000 agreement. As of mid-June, repayments hadn't been made, and Pittsfield officials allege that they were lied to about PathogenX's legitimacy and ability to bring operations to the city. 

"As outlined in the Grant Agreement, the company was required to relocate its operations to Pittsfield and employ a minimum of three (3) individuals in the City by December 31, 2023, with continued operating and staffing levels to be maintained thereafter," an April 7 notice of default and demand of repayment reads.  

"To date, PathogenX has failed to establish operations in Pittsfield and has no employees located within the City." 

In 2023, the City Council allocated $150,000 of General Electric economic development funds to support the company developing a stand-alone onsite device that utilizes thermal heat to convert medical waste into safer waste by killing pathogens, bacteria, and viruses.

At the time, CEO Charles "Chuck" Berkeley, a Pittsfield native, said he wanted to start moving forward immediately with the goal of establishing a manufacturing facility and developing generation two technology by the end of 2024.

Now, a link to the company's website in a 2023 iBerkshires article no longer works, and its status on Pitchbook.com is "out of business." The city alleges that the company "operated as a shell corporation, failed to observe corporate formalities, and was dominated and controlled entirely by Charles Berkeley for personal gain." 

Berkeley, the named defendant, is described as the "sole officer, director, president, treasurer, and secretary of PathogenX, Inc., and exercised complete control over the corporation." 


The city is suing on counts of breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, equitable relief, unjust enrichment, fraud in the inducement, and fraud. Pittsfield asks that the company repay the $70,000 dispersed plus costs, cover attorneys' fees, and "pierce the corporate veil" and hold Berkeley personally liable for the obligations of PathogenX Inc.

It also provides documents showing that PathogenX failed to pay taxes in its home jurisdiction of Wyoming and has been "administratively dissolved" as of October 2024. 

The Economic Development Grant Agreement required PathogenX to establish legitimate business operations in Pittsfield by the end of 2023, stipulating that in the event PathogenX fails to remedy a contract breach within 120 days, it will have to repay all funds disbursed as of the date of the breach. 

The city alleges that the company made material false representations, including the intent to establish legitimate business operations in Pittsfield and comply with the funding contract. 

"These false representations were made knowingly, or with reckless disregard for the truth, and with the intent to induce Plaintiff to disburse public funds," it reads. 

"… Defendants made false representations of material fact to the City, including, but not limited to, opening an office, leasing space, and hiring employees in the City of Pittsfield and its future intentions of establishing operations and meeting job creation benchmarks," 

"Defendants knew these representations were false when made, and/or made them with reckless disregard as to their truth and falsity." 

Update: Devon W. Grierson, city solicitor, said on Friday morning that the city had made demand for repayment from PathogenX and that "they have not responded to any of our communications to date."

An email address could not be found for Berkeley and there has been no response yet for request for comment sent to the company's other co-founder.

"I have aspirations of doing more than just bringing a business here," Berkeley told the Community and Economic Development subcommittee in 2023. 

"I want to do something for the kids. I know when I came up, I didn't have everything that a lot of other kids had, so if I could bring something to the community in that way as well as make PathogenX a household name, that would be really cool. It'll be a big accomplishment."

City of Pittsfield, PathogenX Inc. Lawsuit by Brittany Polito


Tags: economic development,   lawsuit,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Committee Recommends Scanlon for City Audit

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— After the bid for a new auditing company came back over 30 percent higher, Pittsfield will stick with Scanlon and Associates. 

On Tuesday, the Auditing Services Evaluation Committee voted to advance Scanlon to the City Council for an independent audit.  CliftonLarsonAllen also responded to the bid, but came in costing $120,000 more. 

"I have to go with saving money for the city. I mean, the discrepancy is too much of a difference," committee member Karen Kalinowsky said. 

"The city could have use for that difference over the next three years." 

This process was prompted by Rule 40 of the council rules and the City Charter, where in any year the City Council votes to hold a procurement process for an independent certified public accountant or firm to audit Pittsfield's books and accounts, the city must, through its Finance Committee with the assistance of the purchasing department, solicit requests for proposals or invitations for bids before June 1. 

The council in March recommended that the purchasing agent draft a request for proposals and put it out to bid. 

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, who has been vocally in favor of the independent audit for years, said the city doesn't have to follow a bidding process for the professional service, "We are doing this so the public knows that we're being professional, and a looking for other options, looking at what the best options are, and comparing them based on what they can offer and what the cost is." 

Board member Kathy Amuso said both CLA and Scanlon have equitable reviews with high recommendations.  Especially considering the budget crisis Pittsfield is in, she moved to recommend Scanlon to the full council. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories