BRTA Board Sees Open Meeting Law Complaint

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The BRTA Advisory Board is reforming its search for a new administrator after an Open Meeting Law complaint. 

This includes a re-evaluation of all submitted resumes and amending the Berkshire Regional Transit Authority's governing bylaws. On Thursday, the board held a special meeting to address the complaint from a member. 

Rene Wood alleged that the search for a new authority administrator "was not properly noticed for the average person to understand."  

She said there was no agenda posted for a search committee meeting in July when potential candidates were moved forward, and insufficient information was provided for the June meeting during which members were appointed to the task. 

"I felt that it was appropriate to inform the public of this major action being taken by this board, and that's why I suggested review and redo," Wood said after recusing herself from the boardroom table. 

Board members agreed to consider the resumes and consider amending the BRTA bylaws, which haven't been updated since 2013, during their regular meeting on Aug. 28. 

Administrator Robert Malnati is retiring next year after more than two decades with the transportation agency, and the search has begun for his successor. According to meeting minutes, Malnati announced his upcoming retirement to the board on May 22 and said the Finance Committee would appoint a search committee. 

In the complaint, Wood reported being told that the July 9 meeting was private and did not need to be posted. She asserted that there are no private meetings for an organization subject to Open Meeting Law.

Malnati explained that the ad hoc search committee meeting over Zoom narrowed the applicant pool to the top four or five applicants. The meeting was not posted. 

"That was the extent of the meeting and the next steps, what were the next steps," he said. 


There was a total of 16 applications, which were narrowed down based on qualification. A job posting describes the administrator as being the "face of the agency," with strong leadership, integrity and responsibility, communication, and resiliency. The incoming administrator would earn between $140,000 and $160,000 annually. 

Search committee members were approved at the Finance/Audit Committee's June 25 meeting, and Wood believes there wasn't enough information in the agenda for the average person to know what they were searching for. 

The agenda reads "Approval of Search Committee Members- VOTE." 

"Reviewing all the available agendas posted on BRTA's website going back to 1/30/25, there is no mention in any agenda of what this Search Committee is to do, just as there is no mention of the search for a new BRTA Administrator to replace Mr. Malnati, or that authorizations to proceed will be discussed or voted upon," the complaint reads. 

Wood included an iBerkshires.com article from June 23 announcing the administrator's retirement in the complaint packet. 

In reviewing the BRTA bylaws, she found that the Advisory Board, Budget Committee, and Compensation Committee are the only bodies listed. The complaint asks, "There is no formal status for a Finance/Audit Committee; As such, is it legal to hold a meeting on 6/25/25 with an agenda including 'Approval for Search Committee Members- VOTE'?" 

She asked that the BRTA start the administrator search activities over, only have committees that are listed in the bylaws, review and redo actions taken this year that violate OML, and require members to attend OML training. 

"I think my bigger concern is, what do we do to update the bylaws to address the issue that we are having committees meet that don't exist?" said Mayor Peter Marchetti, the city's representative on the advisory board. 

"... If you have an ad hoc committee that's the search committee, if it doesn't exist in your bylaws, by whose authority is that search committee working?" 

The applications will be shared with Advisory Board members and, at the next scheduled meeting, they will decide which candidates will move forward to interviews. 


Tags: open meeting complaint,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories