image description
Lake Onota Village Association, which was purchased by the the tenants, will no longer have to go through a city board to determine its rent. Rather, it will be voted by the association in line with state regulations.

Pittsfield Council OKs Mobile Home Language Change for Lake Onota Village Association

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Lake Onota Village Association asked the City Council to change the City Code to exclude owner-occupied parks from the city's rent control. 
 
Last Tuesday, the council said, "yes," and commended the mobile home park residents for buying their community and being self-governed. 
 
The residents banded together to buy the property earlier this year and, in September, voted to purchase it for $5.5 million. Board members of the association have to abide by rent regulations from the state after receiving a $2 million grant. 
 
"If we want to keep the $2 million and not have any issues with the state, we are going to have to stay within 30 percent of the area's two-bedroom average rental unit cost. So a two-bedroom apartment in Pittsfield, 30 percent of that is $530 a month," said member Michael Hubbard. "We are proposing a rent of $522 a month. So we are under the requirement. The state is not going to allow us to raise the rent any more than 5 percent per year, which I think is way more than we would ever consider."
 
He spoke about how the association is a nonprofit and will not take any profit from the rent.
 
"We're a nonprofit corporation. Nobody collects a salary, and we will be voting every year annually on what the rent will be, and the rent may go up, the rent may go down, depending on what our expenses are in that particular year," he said. "So we will have to abide by the state's requirements. We will have to abide by the vote of the members, the owners of the property, and until today, also abide by your rent control board."
 
He also asked the definition of a mobile home park be changed to include the language excluding any park that is owned or operated by a corporation or association whose shareholders or members constitute 66 percent or more of the households in the community.
 
The Ordinance & Rules subcommittee had recommended the changes at its September meeting. 
 
"We're just changing the definition for the sake of people who own their own mobile home park so that they don't have to go through control board, just like if you had a condo association or an HOA, or if a bunch of people decided to turn their their apartment building into a co-op, we wouldn't step in on their behalf, because they should be able to set their own destiny," said Councilor at Large Alisa Costa, who had presented the petition on behalf of the association. 
 
Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren also weighed in on support for the association.
 
"They don't need protection from themselves. They're organized. They've actually done a hell of a job to be able to get if I recall, right from the ordinance rules meeting, you guys got $6 million worth of funding, and you talked about the $2 million grant. I mean, that's amazing to put that together," he said. "We're looking at doing different projects, and sometimes we can't find the funding. So you guys know what you want to do. You guys are self-governed. There was some concern that maybe taking you out might not be legal. It's definitely legal, and I commend you on it, and I will definitely support it."
 
The City Council approved to change the language for the association to be able to control its rent and not have to go through the Mobile Home Rent Control Board.

Tags: mobile home park,   rent control,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Flooding Leads Pittsfield ConCom to Bel Air Dam Deconstruction Site

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Bel Air Dam project team toured the site on Monday with the Conservation Commission to review conditions following a flooding incident

Work has been on hold for two weeks after melting snow and a release of water from Pontoosuc Lake led to water overtopping of the almost 200-year-old, abandoned dam. The project team says deconstruction is still on track to end in December. 

"They have plenty of time to finish the work, so they don't expect that they're going to need extra time, but we're all waiting," reported Robert Lowell, the Department of Conservation and Recreation's deputy chief engineer. 

"… it's unfortunate, but the high-water conditions in the spring, we did have in the contract that the site might flood, so there was supposed to be a contingency for it, and we're now dealing with the complications of that." 

DCR's Office of Dam Safety is leading the $20 million removal of the classified "high hazard" dam, funded by American Rescue Plan Act dollars. It has been an area of concern for more than a decade. 

The dam on Pontoosuc Brook dates to 1832 and was used for nearly a hundred years to power a long-gone woolen mill. It's being targeted for removal, using American Rescue Plan Act funds, because the stacked stone structure poses a significant danger to homes and businesses downstream. Excavation of sediment began last fall by contractor SumCo Eco-Contracting of Wakefield. 

Earlier this month, community members noticed flooding at the site bordering Wahconah Street; water levels were down by the next week. Conservation commissioners called for the site visit with concerns about the effects of the water release and how it is being remedied.  

The group got a look at the large project area near the dam and asked questions. Chair James Conant explained that community members wanted to know the cause of the flooding. 

Jane Winn, former executive director of the Berkshire Environmental Action Team, said this was specifically brought up at the Conservation Commission hearing to ensure this sort of thing didn't happen. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories