image description
Lake Onota Village Association, which was purchased by the the tenants, will no longer have to go through a city board to determine its rent. Rather, it will be voted by the association in line with state regulations.

Pittsfield Council OKs Mobile Home Language Change for Lake Onota Village Association

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Lake Onota Village Association asked the City Council to change the City Code to exclude owner-occupied parks from the city's rent control. 
 
Last Tuesday, the council said, "yes," and commended the mobile home park residents for buying their community and being self-governed. 
 
The residents banded together to buy the property earlier this year and, in September, voted to purchase it for $5.5 million. Board members of the association have to abide by rent regulations from the state after receiving a $2 million grant. 
 
"If we want to keep the $2 million and not have any issues with the state, we are going to have to stay within 30 percent of the area's two-bedroom average rental unit cost. So a two-bedroom apartment in Pittsfield, 30 percent of that is $530 a month," said member Michael Hubbard. "We are proposing a rent of $522 a month. So we are under the requirement. The state is not going to allow us to raise the rent any more than 5 percent per year, which I think is way more than we would ever consider."
 
He spoke about how the association is a nonprofit and will not take any profit from the rent.
 
"We're a nonprofit corporation. Nobody collects a salary, and we will be voting every year annually on what the rent will be, and the rent may go up, the rent may go down, depending on what our expenses are in that particular year," he said. "So we will have to abide by the state's requirements. We will have to abide by the vote of the members, the owners of the property, and until today, also abide by your rent control board."
 
He also asked the definition of a mobile home park be changed to include the language excluding any park that is owned or operated by a corporation or association whose shareholders or members constitute 66 percent or more of the households in the community.
 
The Ordinance & Rules subcommittee had recommended the changes at its September meeting. 
 
"We're just changing the definition for the sake of people who own their own mobile home park so that they don't have to go through control board, just like if you had a condo association or an HOA, or if a bunch of people decided to turn their their apartment building into a co-op, we wouldn't step in on their behalf, because they should be able to set their own destiny," said Councilor at Large Alisa Costa, who had presented the petition on behalf of the association. 
 
Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren also weighed in on support for the association.
 
"They don't need protection from themselves. They're organized. They've actually done a hell of a job to be able to get if I recall, right from the ordinance rules meeting, you guys got $6 million worth of funding, and you talked about the $2 million grant. I mean, that's amazing to put that together," he said. "We're looking at doing different projects, and sometimes we can't find the funding. So you guys know what you want to do. You guys are self-governed. There was some concern that maybe taking you out might not be legal. It's definitely legal, and I commend you on it, and I will definitely support it."
 
The City Council approved to change the language for the association to be able to control its rent and not have to go through the Mobile Home Rent Control Board.

Tags: mobile home park,   rent control,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Revisiting DEI Office Restructure

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The conversation about the DEI office renaming that was halted by a charter objection will resume on Tuesday. 

The City Council will discuss a request from Mayor Peter Marchetti to restructure the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.  

It proposes to rename the DEI office to the Office of Equity, Access, and Opportunity and merge the Human Rights Commission and Affirmative Action Committee into an Equity, Access and Opportunity Commission.

The Ordinance and Rules Subcommittee supported the changes in August, and in September, Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham delayed the vote with a charter objection. 

Pittsfield's City Code prohibits charter states that "if a single member present objects to the taking of the vote, the vote shall be postponed until the next meeting of the city council." It also stipulates that at least four members must object if it is an emergency measure.

Cunningham also submitted a petition, which was referred to O&R under Rule 27, to replace the DEI Office and the Human Rights Commission with an equity, access, and opportunity coordinator in the Department of Community Development, with formal complaints and Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action functions assigned to Human Resources.

At the last meeting, he spent more than an hour querying the mayor and chief diversity officer about functions and effectiveness of the department, wanting more quantitative data.  Cunningham proposed an ordinance that he says keeps Pittsfield's commitment to equity, access, and opportunity, "refocuses it on measurable results for our residents, and delivers it at a fraction of the current cost." 

Under this petition, the equity, access, and opportunity coordinator would be a $60,000 to $80,000 per year position.

The DEI Office's fiscal year 2027 budget was about $200,000 after cuts during budget season; $106,700 for the chief diversity officer and $58,000 for the administrative assistant. The coordinator would be appointed by the director of community development and the mayor. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories