DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board will review a proposed amendment to the earth-removal bylaw at a future meeting that will include provisions for dealing with dust and debris.
The proposal substantially amends the earth-removal zoning bylaw, specifically the requirement section, to make the language more detailed and to add a stipulation requiring a dust mitigation plan and a reclamation plan.
It maintains in Section One that any application shall be accompanied by a plan prepared by a professional civil engineer and land surveyor registered in Massachusetts. However, the amendment would also require that it be provided in both digital and hard-copy formats.
It proposes that all associated drawings, such as a proposed extraction, restoration, or other associated plans, be overlaid on the master plan of the property.
It also details what to include in each overlay:
The master plan would need to include all separately identified or associated lots that are within the property boundaries.
The operation overplay plan would need to have all areas where operations will take place during the current authorized permit.
The reclamation overlay plan would need to include all areas to be reclaimed during the current authorized permit.
The proposed amendment then created subcategories for each overlay and provides detailed expectations for what to include.
The currency bylaw says that "The plan shall contain the following." However, the proposed amendment breaks this out into its own section (A), which states "the master plan shall contain the following."
This section is divided into five parts: demographics; access routes; existing watercourses and water bodies; and property lines, monuments, or fixed structures.
Part two of the master plan section maintains a portion of the language in the current bylaw, which says
"Existing grades in the area, and in the surrounding area, from which the above material is to be removed, together with the proposed finished grades at the conclusion of the operation, and the proposed cover vegetation and trees. Grades shall be shown at two-foot intervals."
The amendment cuts "together with the proposed finished grades at the conclusion of the operation, and the proposed cover vegetation and trees," and changes two-foot intervals to ten-foot intervals.
The amendment adds an overlay plan to the master plan, with a proposed on-site operations section (Section B), broken down into two parts.
It includes and expands upon parts F and G of the current bylaws: phased areas, if any, and proposed disposal of existing foliage and trees.
The amendment proposes the following language:
All proposed, or planned area(s) of planned operations, inclusive of all extraction, processing, and/or storage areas, included projected phased extraction areas, if any, along with any proposed roads or other fixed means of transportation extracted materials.
Proposed disposal methodology and location of any vegetation such as foliage, trees, stumps, and associated debris, to be removed in the process of any proposed extraction effort.
The amendment adds a Section D, requiring the applicant to provide a proposed dust and noise mitigation plan.
The remaining sections of the amendment are similar to the current bylaw. However, it changes oversight and approval from the Planning Board to a "Special Permit Granting Authority."
The proposed amendment to the zoning section of the town's bylaws, under definitions, adds Special Permit Granting Authority, a local municipal board designated by town zoning bylaws that reviews and grants special permits for specific land uses or development projects.
Its role is to ensure projects meet local criteria, benefit the community, and comply with state zoning laws, all while safeguarding neighborhood interests.
The final change is to section eight of the current bylaws, which currently says, "Soil shall not be disturbed within 150 feet of boundaries of the premises, except at the conclusion of operations if required in order to improve the overall grading."
The proposed change says, "No existing vegetation and/or soil shall not be disturbed within 150 feet of boundaries of the premises, except at the conclusion of operations if required in order to improve the overall grading, or as so defined by the permit conditions.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor:
The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.
Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.
These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.
For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.
We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.
Drivers traveling along Route 8 in Cheshire and Adams should expect delays, lane restrictions, and intermittent closures on Sunday, May 17, due to the MountainOne Steel Rail Races. click for more
In five years, the city has dispersed almost all of the $40.6 million in American Rescue Plan Act funds awarded to help recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. click for more
CT Equities is planning an $8 million redevelopment of the former St. Joseph's, which last operated as a high school nearly a decade ago. click for more
The National Grange is finding its way through the 21st century by building on past success and modifying its mission for modern America.
click for more