Dalton Board to Discuss Storage Container Bylaw

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board will be reviewing a proposed bylaw that would require a special permit for storage containers in a residential zone. 
 
The board briefly discussed the proposed bylaw that is in the very early stages. More in-depth discussions will take place during future meetings. 
 
During the development of proposed bylaws, the board holds public hearings to gather input from the community. Then it goes to town meeting for a vote. 
 
"There's currently a number of storage containers in town which are not permitted. This would basically require getting a permit and restrict the time that the container could be kept," said Dennis Croughwell, Planning Board clerk. 
 
This bylaw is specifically targeting shipping containers that are used as storage, he said. 
 
If approved, the building inspector would be tasked to issue a permit to allow the applicant to temporarily have a storage container on their property.  
 
The container is restricted to a maximum of 20-by-10-by-10 feet and may not be maintained on wheels. Applicants are restricted to one unit, unless otherwise authorized by the building inspector, for no longer than four months, with one two-month extension.
 
In cases where there are more than one storage containers, each unit is separately permitted. 
 
Select Board member Jarred Mongeon and resident Jimbo Doucette expressed concerns surrounding situations where a resident may need one or two storage containers for long periods of time to address emergencies, such as flooding or an oil spill in the basement. 
 
Croughwell explained that the bylaw doesn’t restrict people from having storage containers; rather just requires they have a permit.
 
Board member Donald Davis Jr. also questioned whether this bylaw would affect those who purchase storage containers and add siding to match the architecture of the main building. 
 
Croughwell said the bylaw would not restrict that but would require the resident to get a permit, which would be renewed annually.
 
Davis said he is not a fan of requiring that the permit be renewed annually for those who apply for the permit to have a shed. 
 
He believed that in cases like this, the homeowner would only have the unit approved once and not to require a renewal. 
 
According to the proposal the purpose of this bylaw would be to standardize, reusable, portable, or transferable, enclosed metal units which are placed separately from the main structure to provide storage space for permitted uses. 
 
The fee for the storage container would be set by the Select Board or their designee. 
 
The containers would also have to abide by the town’s zoning bylaws, including the setbacks. 
 
Additionally, it must not occupy or hinder active parking or traffic circulation areas and be located in areas not visible from roadways. The units also have to be properly maintained to not create an eyesore.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Seeks State Support for Berkshire Mall Redevelopment

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires.com
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town plans to petition the state to take ownership of the Route 7/Route 8 Connector Road, which officials believe is a "critical component" of the Berkshire Mall’s redevelopment strategy.
 
On Tuesday, the Select Board approved a letter to state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III to request their support for the vacant mall's redevelopment by helping advance transfer of the Route 7/Route 8 connector and considering funding for essential infrastructure.
 
"We have held discussions with the Baker Hill Road District … which will take the necessary steps to formally petition the commonwealth to take over ownership of the Route 7, Route 8 connector…Your continued support in facilitating this transfer is greatly appreciated," the letter says. 
 
Berkshire Mall owner JMJ RE Holdings has said the potential sale and redevelopment of the mall hinges on dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, a condition of the agreement that, if unmet, would render the contract null and void.
 
As a result, the mall will continue to deteriorate and the litigation will proceed forward, said Tim Grogan, of JMJ. 
 
Vera Farrell, the liaison to the Baker Hill Road District, said the district board had discussed at one of its most recent meetings that the connector road could be transferred directly to the state, rather than returned to the town; Barrett and Mark were also a part of the discussion.
 
"The representatives recommended that as an option, that it could transfer the connector road directly to the state, as opposed to deeding it back to the town to dispense it. If we get to that point, that would be a better option to do it that way," Farrell said. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories