Dalton Capital Planning Committee Takes First Steps

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Capital Planning Committee held its first meeting last week; the first step in a yearlong process of developing a five-year capital plan. 
 
The meeting kicked off with Thomas Irwin, a Finance Committee member, elected chairman, and Dennis Croughwell, a Planning Board member, elected vice chair. 
 
The committee was established during the annual town meeting in May 2025. Irwin was instrumental in developing the Capital Planning Committee, which was modeled on the town of Lee's committee.
 
The goal is to produce a practical, prioritized five-year capital improvement plan that helps the Select Board and Finance Committee make informed budget and capital decisions. 
 
According to Town Manager Eric Anderson, the committee is responsible for collecting and reviewing all capital plans that impact the town.
 
This includes plans from departments and agencies outside its direct authority, such as the water department, fire department, schools, and relevant Pittsfield agencies — especially those concerning sewer and wastewater treatment.
 
The committee's goal is to gain a comprehensive understanding of capital needs and their budgetary impact across all sectors, and then prioritize these needs based on urgency.
 
The committee is developing a framework for the work ahead, specifically discussing potential funding sources, the methodology for gathering information, and a clear capital threshold. 
 
According to a previous meeting, the plan will include sections for several areas, including bridges, culverts, municipal separate storm sewer systems, roads, sidewalks, the complete streets plan, building and grounds, vehicles, equipment, and more. 
 
Committee members also emphasized the need to integrate the Master Plan into the five-year capital plan, because several of the items in the document are "aggressive" and can not be done within the span of five-years. 
 
The Master Plan is an extensive document, more than 100 pages long, so committee members also recommended the development of a condensed, digestible version to inform their work.
 
Early on in the meeting, the committee tried to determine potential funding sources, aside from borrow, to consider including free cash, the capital stabilization fund, state or federal grants, such as the Enterprise Fund, technical grants from Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, and competitive grants.
 
It was demonstrated that a lot of grants require projects to be shovel-ready with cost estimates. 
 
Committee members raised questions about the threshold for defining a capital project and plan to coordinate with the Finance Committee to clarify this.
 
Threshold mentions included $10,000 and a useful life of five years, or $25,000 and five years. 
 
It was proposed that the committee's work be done in phases, from June through September would be preparatory, where background material is gathered, including five-year plans, relevant intermunicipal agreements, and encouraging departments to start assembling capital plan requests. 
 
From Oct. 15 through Jan. 15, capital plan requests should be submitted and intensive work in the plans development would commence. 
 
Committee members advocated to meet roughly twice monthly through Jan. 15 of each year to compile, prioritize, and finalize the five-year capital plan for the Select Board and Finance Committee by mid-January, prior to the start of budget season. 
 
The committee agreed to avoid being active from February to April as many members are tied up with Finance Committee duties.
 
The committee will meet the last Thursday in February to approve a timeline, format, and what information it will require from department heads. 

Tags: capital budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories