image description

Adams Jordan Street Parking Fix Causes Neighborhood Tension

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
ADAMS, Mass. — The years-old culvert collapse on Jordan Street that has displaced residential parking in the winter is creating tension amongst neighbors. 
 
While most residents on the narrow, one-way street have access to private parking, a select few were left with no legal options during the winter months.  
 
 
The permit allows overnight parking from the North Side of Jordan Street, opposite 17 to 31 Jordan St., where the culvert impacted private parking. 
 
Owner of the duplex located at 16 Jordan St., Christopher Martindill, attended the board meeting to request a permit for his tenants because of an ongoing dispute with a neighbor in the multi-family home at 17-31 Jordan St. 
 
Martindill explained that for the last decade his tenants have parked on the street in front of the duplex without issue, until the parking fix.
 
"You were kind of collateral damage here because we made a decision to section of Jordan street parking … and it's part of your house, is where we ended up putting the residents of the impacted individuals from 17 to 31 Jordan St.," Chair John Duval said. 
 
It was explained that overnight parking is restricted townwide during the winter. 
 
Martindill said he works diligently to maintain parking spaces outside his apartments. He clears snow not only in front of his own duplex but also from adjacent areas, including in front of 18 Jordan, to create space for multiple cars.
 
Since he clears these spots, disputes sometimes arise among neighbors over who has the right to park there, Martindill said. 
 
Additionally, he clears part of the yard to ensure all his tenants can park off-street during the winter parking ban, since the duplex has only one driveway.
 
If the town does permit parking only in front of Martindill's duplex, his tenants do not qualify because they are not one of the residents impacted by the culvert. 
 
"I don't care that [the neighbors are] in front of my house, per se, because obviously I don't own the street… I was just trying to get two parking passes [for my tenants] so they can park comfortably without worrying about getting a ticket," he said. 
 
Martindill said shifting the parking fix closer to Mill Street may help because no one parks in front of the four houses past his house in that direction, even in the summertime. 
 
The board said it could extend the permitted parking area for the entire Jordan Street. However interim Police Chief Timothy Sorrell cautioned against that as it would make it harder for the Highway Department when plowing. 
 
Having a fixed area for permitted parking ensures that the plows only have to avoid that section, he said. 
 
The board did not reach a resolution during the meeting. Instead, members approved a recommendation to install permit parking-only signs in locations to be determined at Sorrell's discretion.
 
Sorrell said he will collaborate with Martindill to find a solution to the situation and will present it to the board before the signs are placed. 
 
When the winter season ends, and there is no longer an overnight parking ban this will no longer be as much of an issue, Sorrell said. 
 
The only way this will get rectified is by fixing the culvert which the town has been working towards the last five years, Selectman Joseph Nowak said. 
 
 
The culvert carries Miller Brook into Tophet Brook behind 17 Jordan. The new culvert is designed to be 2 feet wider and a foot deeper, and will be moved away from problem areas, including the parking lot it currently runs underneath.
 
The town first heard about the failing culvert by its public works staff but when the town hired a preliminary engineer to do an assessment, it was discovered the project was going to be very complex and expensive. 
 
The town reached out to the state Emergency Management Agency, MEMA, to see if they could provide some assistance and was directed to FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and was approved by both FEMA and MEMA to begin engineering in 2021. 
 
Adams was awarded $1.7 million of the then $2.2 million in two obligations, with the town picking up $572,000.
 
It was said in September that the town has asked for a budget amendment after the construction costs swelled from the original $2.2 million.
 
The Community Development Director Donna Cesan previously noted that MEMA will not enter into a formal agreement until funding is fully secured. 
 
Nowak said the town received an extension, however, he was at a meeting where he found out the federal funding isn't going to come. 
 
"The money from the feds aren't coming. Matter of fact, everything that we send now that normally goes to Boston for FEMA is going directly to Washington, D.C., because they want to micromanage everything. We're a Democratic state, and unfortunately, we're getting the short end of the stick," he said. 
 
The board will be given an update on the culvert situation in the spring. 

Tags: culvert,   parking,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Planning Board Cited for Open Meeting Law Violation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
ADAMS, Mass. — The state Attorney General's Office has determined that the Planning Board violated Open Meeting Law by continuing to deliberate on a matter after adjournment.
 
According to the determination, the violation occurred after adjourning the Jan. 27, 2025, meeting when three board members stayed to discuss permitting concerns for Aisling Mountain Farm, a 22-acre equestrian facility on West Road owned by Kathryn Foley.
 
The board was ordered to amend its meeting minutes within the next 30 days, to include a summary of the discussion that occurred after the meeting was adjourned, to certify to to the AG's Office that it has done so, and to comply with the Open Meeting Law going forward.
 
The ruling stems from a complaint filed by Catherine Foster on Aug. 22, 2025, alleging that the board violated the Open Meeting Law during and after its Jan. 27 meeting.
 
Although filed nearly seven months after the January meeting, the Attorney General's Office said it met the 30-day filing deadline because Foster did not become aware of the situation until it was raised at a July 23 Select Board meeting.
 
"The Open Meeting Law requires that complaints be filed within 30 days of the alleged violation, or if the alleged violation could not reasonably have been known at the time it occurred, then within 30 days of the date it should reasonably have been discovered," Assistant Attorney General Matthew Lindberg said in the determination.
 
"The complainant could not reasonably have discovered that the Board deliberated after adjournment of the January 27 meeting until the issue was raised during public comment at the July 23 Select Board meeting. Because the complaint was filed within 30 days of the July 23 Select Board meeting, the complaint was filed timely as to this allegation"
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories