Dalton Board of Health Updates Food Permit Fee System

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — Food establishments can anticipate a change to their food establishment permit fees. 
 
The board of health approved a new permitting system that shifts away from a flat fee to a categorized system that uses the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's risk-based food establishment categories. 
 
Rather than having an "arbitrary" flat price structure that focuses on the specific type of business, number of seats, square footage, and other factors, the new system categorizes establishments based on a risk assessment, Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Health Agent Jazu Stine said. 
 
Under this new system, an establishment's risk level category dictates how many times a year they need to be inspected, he said. 
 
The more inspections needed, the higher the permit fee should be to cover the cost of doing Inspections, Stine's proposal said. 
 
"[We're] trying not to lose money by doing a lot of inspections that you're not really getting paid for,"Board member James "Jimbo" Doucette said. 
 
"Unfortunately, I mean, I think we can all attest to just like everything in the world is getting rapidly more expensive in the past few years," Stine added. 
 
The four tiers range low-risk operations with limited or no time and temperature control for safety (TCS) food preparation to high risk. 
 
The tiers are as follows: 
  • Tier 1: low-risk establishments have a fee of $150. This includes businesses that sell or prepare mostly pre-packaged or non-TCS foods, with limited heating and no cooling of TCS foods. It also includes Tier 2 businesses that have demonstrated a consistent history of effectively managing foodborne illness risks.
  • Tier 2: most food-service establishments have a fee of $200. This includes establishments with immediate food service and limited complex TCS preparation, as well as qualifying Tier 3 businesses with proven food-safety controls and newly permitted Tier 1 establishments.
  • Tier 3: full-service restaurants have a fee of $300. This includes restaurants with extensive menus that handle raw ingredients and many TCS foods, requiring complex preparation such as cooking, cooling, reheating, and hot or cold holding as well as qualifying Tier 4 businesses with proven food-safety controls and newly permitted Tier 2 establishments.
  • Tier 4: has a fee of $400 and includes establishments serving highly susceptible populations, conducting high-risk, hazard analysis critical control point, or specialized processes, as well as businesses that would otherwise be listed as tier 3 but has a history of risk factor violations. 
 

Tags: board of health,   inspections office,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Why Dalton Sewer Bills Are Increasing

Letter to the Editor

Dalton residents are understandably concerned about the substantial increase in sewer bills. To put this in context, understanding that this increase was the result of a Federal mandate and not a local decision is important.

Dalton does not have its own wastewater treatment plant. Our sewage is sent to Pittsfield and treated at Pittsfield's wastewater treatment plant. Several years ago, Pittsfield was required by federal environmental regulations to make major upgrades to their plant, particularly substantial upgrades needed to reduce nutrients such as nitrogen discharged into the environment. These
were not improvements Pittsfield simply chose to make; they were compelled to make them to meet federal requirements.
Those improvements cost Pittsfield $77M, which Dalton benefits from because Pittsfield treats our sewage. Dalton therefore has a responsibility for its fair share of those costs. Although the upgraded plant came online in 2020, Dalton has not been paying its share of those new capital costs. Consequently, the increase residents are now facing reflects costs that, realistically, we
should have begun paying six years ago.

Unfortunately, building our own wastewater treatment plant is not a practical, less expensive alternative. Ignoring that we do not have a location for one, constructing, operating, staffing, and maintaining a treatment plant that meets today's environmental standards would cost Dalton substantially more than continuing to rely on Pittsfield to treat our wastewater.

I am hoping that although we don't like a higher sewer bill, knowing the background may make it somewhat easier to accept.

Bob Bishop
Dalton Select Board, Chair

View Full Story

More Dalton Stories