image description
On Wednesday, Sept. 30, the Healey-Driscoll Administration hosted a listening session at the Berkshire Innovation Center.

Healey Administration Visits Pittsfield to Talk Green Energy Siting

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— Massachusetts energy officials visited Pittsfield to talk about clean energy infrastructure siting as the state works to cut greenhouse gas emissions. 

On Wednesday, Sept. 30, the Healey-Driscoll Administration hosted a listening session at the Berkshire Innovation Center.  Representatives from Berkshire communities and organizations heard about solar arrays, battery storage, and more.  

The 2024 clean energy bill aims for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.  As part of it, municipalities must begin accepting single consolidated local permit applications for small clean energy projects this month. 

"We have new regulations coming into place, and just want to make sure we are hearing from people because we know it's not always easy. We have a lot of commitments on clean energy and climate that are really important, and they help us on our energy affordability, but we know there's also often tension with our land preservation values," Deputy Climate Chief Aladdine Joroff said. 

"We want to preserve rural character. We have to protect critical forests and ecosystems for habitat and water supply. We're thinking about how we balance those different goals." 

She explained that large clean energy systems, in addition to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, have public health benefits and are more affordable. 

Since 2008, more than 200,000 solar arrays have been installed statewide, surpassing a 4,500 megawatt milestone.  Roughly 98 percent of those installations are residential scale, sized between five and ten kilowatts, and solar is the second largest source of generation capacity in the state, as well as in New England. 

Undersecretary of Energy Michael Judge explained that solar has shifted peaks into the evening by reducing demand in the middle of the day, largely contributing to the retirement of some fossil fuel generation facilities and lowering wholesale energy prices.

The 2024 Climate Act outlines significant reforms to the permitting and siting process of wind, solar, storage, and other electric infrastructure.  It establishes a 12-month deadline for municipal permitting and requires communities to issue a single permit at the end of their process, and improves the equitable siting and community engagement processes. 

The state encourages solar projects on rooftops, parking lots, landfills, and brownfields as opposed to open space.  Overall, more than half of the installed solar has met this criterion; over 80 percent in 2025. 


There are about 600 ground-mounted projects statewide that are one megawatt or larger. 

"In terms of how solar fits into our clean energy and climate plans-it's really key to keeping electricity affordable and reducing greenhouse gas emissions," Judge said. 

"Our last iteration of our clean energy and climate plan, which was issued in 2022, estimates that we will need somewhere between 27,000 and 34,000 megawatts of solar by 2050 to meet our greenhouse gas reduction requirements. That's about a six- to eight times growth of what we have installed today, so quite a bit more has to be installed. May not all have to be installed in Massachusetts. Could be installed throughout the region, but we need to build a lot more, basically, is the bottom line." 

He explained that in the 2020s, there has been a shift to lithium iron phosphate batteries for storage, which have a much higher temperature threshold. 

Since 2017, Massachusetts has installed about 1,600 megawatt-hours of storage over 7,000 individual projects, including around 175 grid-connected batteries with a capacity of one megawatt-hour or larger.  The 1000-megawatt-hour target by 2025 was met. 

About 25 percent of those batteries are in the four Western Mass counties, accounting for 15 percent of the statewide capacity, but most of the large utility-scale projects connecting to the transmission system are being proposed in Eastern Mass, Judge reported. 

"The top 10 percent of hours in terms of peak demand account for 40 percent of the cost that you see on your bill," he said. 

"That's because poles, wires, substations, power plants, higher priced energy, all has to be you have to build all of that into the system to meet that peak demand. So anything you can do to shave that peak really lowers costs."


 


Tags: energy,   solar,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories