Letter: Dalton Taxes and Fees

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Dalton where every retired person has a money tree growing in their back yard. Well my wife's and mine is plucked clean.

The latest assault was the incredible increase in the sewer fee. The town Select Board pleaded "It's not our fault." Well it is your fault. It goes back to 1974 when the town signed a contract with the City of Pittsfield, where the Town of Dalton was on the hook for 17 percent of whatever improvements at the Pittsfield Waste Water Treatment Facility are made. So, the Town has had 52 years to prepare for this current crisis. But, they do what they have always done. Ignore it until becomes a crisis. How are we going to pay for the $10 million for water system upgrades and $11 million for sewer system upgrades? Those numbers came directly from the town manager.

What is the true cost of water to the taxpayer? Let's start with the Fire District Tax. That amount depends on the assessed value of your property, then add the yearly water bill of $300 and then the yearly sewer bill of $1,200. In my wife's and my case add a minimum $240 for bottled water, because we can't drink the town water. So, water ain't cheap folks.

The town wants to build a new police and fire station. Where is that money going to come from? The old Nessacus Junior High School would have a perfect building for the town offices. That would have left the whole Town Hall to be converted to a new police station. But, the town elected to allow the building to fall into complete disrepair.

We lived across the street across the school for 35 years and watched that building fall apart. Why, because the town ignored it. It then cost the town a million dollars to knock it down. What a waste. The second opportunity for a police station would have been to use a portion of the old Wahconah High School. It would have been perfect.

Remember the cost of the new high school has buried the town in insurmountable debt: 82 votes put us in this situation.
What happened to the town pursuing the sale of 13 building lots on the old Nessucus Junior High lot.? They were suppose to do that last year.

On Monday, Oct. 19, the Town of Dalton will hold a special town meeting. The fate of 5,100 registered voters will be in the hands of the poorly attended meeting. Usually less than 50 registered voters attend.

Being that the land acquisition for the proposed police station is one of the of the articles to voted on, you can bet that every policeman and town employee will be present to tilt the vote. So, it will pass. Why do we need to buy a lot now?

Won't it be available next year or even the year after? Where is the money coming from to pay Foresight Surveying Services and Humes Architects?

When you add up all the articles to be voted on a total of $2,286,840.70 will be spent. That's a lot of money.

When will the ridiculous town meeting form of government end? When will the Town of Dalton stop disenfranchising the majority of the registered voters? What gives the town the right of picking the pockets of 4,900 registered voters at the hands of so few?

It's time that the voters of Dalton stand up and stop being disenfranchised. Another big dollar project we have forgot about is the rebuilding of Dalton Division Road. We own $800,000 of that project plus another Million for a round-about at the end of the road.

Unfortunately, we are not like the Towns of Lenox or Lee, where they benefit from hundreds of businesses that add to the town's revenue. Here in Dalton we lean heavily on the taxpayers for the majority of the town's revenue. 65 percent of the taxpayers are retired citizens on a fixed income.

If no one has noticed but people are leaving in droves. Ninety percent are leaving because they are not willing to pay the town's taxes and fees. So, in summation the Town in the name of moving their ridiculously expensive agenda ahead. They are willing to bury every tax payer. It's time to fight back.

If the Select Board is not at fault then who is?

Bruce Lester
Dalton, Mass. 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Property Tax Rate Up 5%

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday approved a single tax rate that will increase the average homeowner's property bill by at least $670.

With a rate of $18.20 per $1,000 valuation, the average single-family home valued at $373,784 will see a $668 increase, and the average commercial property, estimated at a value of $577,990, will increase by $1,125 per year. This rate is 91 cents higher than last year's $17.29 per $1,000 valuation.

"Historically, as part of their annual budget policy, the Select Board and Finance Committee has endorsed a single tax rate option, providing no exemption or discount to a particular property class or group, voting a residential factor of one, which is what we'll do tonight, affirms a single tax rate and proportionate sharing of the tax levy burden between all classes of property," Principal Assessor Ross Vivori explained during the joint meeting with the Finance Committee and Board of Assessors. 

This year's levy is $11,760,845, which is a 11.28 percent increase from last year, or $1,192,521.

The town's total taxable value is $648,200,324; about $541 million in residential, almost $9 million in industrial, about $52 million in commercial, and about $44 million in personal property. It is 5.7 percent higher than the previous year.

For fiscal 2027 the max allowable levy is $12,313,803, the town is levying $11,760,845, leaving an excess levy capacity of $552,957. There was more than $6.5 million in new growth, which was described as contributing about $112,855 in tax revenue at the prior year's rate.

Finance Committee member Al Terranova suggested that the rate may change if revenues, such as from the state, changed. 
 
"I just don't want people to look at this and, 'Oh my goodness, I'm going to pay $600 more a year,'" he said. "They would  just pick out that one number, because you don't know what the actual number is."
 
Select Board Chair Deborah Maynard said all the figures are based on the tax recapitulation sheet, which includes estimated revenues and state cherry sheet numbers. 
 
"But there's no way around that, that's the number we're paying," added Select Board member Jason A. Breault. "That's the tax rate."
 
Ross said property values are rising because people are paying more for homes, but that's not driving the tax rate — town spending is.
 
"If the [property] value goes up and nothing else changes, the tax rate stays the same," he said. "What's driving the tax rate up is the budget ... everything's gone up and you've got raise the money to operate the town. It is what it is." 

In better news, the board accepted what Accountant Angela Garrity agreed was a "healthy" amount of free cash at $949,833. 

The board also heard from the public about putting a moratorium on data centers and battery storage facilities at its next meeting as well as Old State Road residents asking about the speed bump removed at the intersection of Target and Old State Road.

The residents said two years ago they had asked for the speed bump and were wondering why they were not warned it was being removed. 

The three people said they were afraid to cross the street for their mailbox or walk their dogs. They also said it is very hard for them to leave their driveway at the intersection. 

The Select Board could not respond during public comment, but at its last meeting, it decided to remove the speed bump based on information from police that it was "useless" as a deterrent and from Emergency Medical Services Director Jen Weber that it was dangerous when transporting patients.

An ad hoc committee with Weber and Police Chief Robert Derksen and board members Breault and Jeff Walters to discuss the best options on reduce speeding in some areas. Maynard reminded people that community members wanting to serve are being asked to submit citizens' interest form with the town.

Lastly, Alison Dixon from Berkshire Regional Planning Commission and Berkshire Environmental Action Team's Executive Director Brittany Ebeling presented two Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness action grant projects. 

One project is the road stream crossing prioritization and assessment program for town-owned bridges and culverts to prioritize crossing replacements. Dixon explained that undersized culverts were identified as a vulnerability in the town's MVP and hazard and mitigation plan. The project is expected to span two years and will notify nearby landowners before field crews work around culverts and bridges. Community members were also invited to share knowledge about crossings they believe have been problematic.

The second project will cover ghost dams. BEAT and BRPC will be working with watershed organizations and a youth team from Greenagers over the next two years locating and documenting unmapped, human-made dams, also called ghost dams, which may pose flood risks. The goal is to create a Berkshires-wide map and connect towns and landowners with information and resources for flood-resilience planning.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories