Lanesborough Forms Panel to Address Swamp Road Speeding

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Residents of Swamp Road and Old State Road want to get a handle on speedsters.

Last week, the Select Board heard from them about the safety regarding the many vehicles that speed down the country roads and the speed bumps that don't do much.

Resident Joe Szczepaniak said the traffic and speeding on Swamp Road has been terrible. He said more people have been using the road since Oak Hill Road and Partridge Road have gotten speed bumps, citing drivers are avoiding those roads to use Swamp.

"We got quite a problem on Swamp Road with the traffic. The speed is awful. There's not enough the Police Department can do to ever control this problem." 

He said the speeding starts early in the morning, claiming some drivers do around 80 mph. He and others in the audience are worried that their children or someone will get hurt as people cross the road many times. He thought speed bumps could help control the problem.

"It really got bad from when Oak Hill Road and Partridge Road went to the 12 or 14 speed bumps," Szczepaniak said. "So obviously now they're not going down that way. They're going down Swamp Road ... It's just we have to get a couple speed bumps in this Swamp Road to slow this thing down." 

He said the speed bump installed on Old State Road near the Target entrance has been useless and should have in the lane for exiting Target, as people never stop for that stop sign. 

Szczepaniak asked Police Chief Rob Derksen if he knew what he was talking about.

"There is an issue there with that whole intersection design is poor in my opinion, but I'm not a highway engineer," Derksen replied. 

He said he is for removing the speed bump and how he sends patrols when Szczepaniak tells him there is speeding, and added that speed bumps can be ineffective and dangerous, as drivers just speed up right after going over them.

"They hit those speed bumps at 40 to 60 mph, obviously you're going to have a major accident, potentially a fatality … DPW with plowing," the chief said. "I'm all for removing the one that is on Old State [Road]. I never endorsed that, and I think it's caused more issues than it's helped. I think there's a lot of people that have agreed with that. And then obviously emergency response. If the speed bumps are there, we can't get to those scenes effectively."

Emergency Medical Services Director Jen Weber also noted how it can be hazardous when transferring patients, and that sometimes ambulance drivers choose to avoid the speed bump to not risk the life of someone in the back of the vehicle.

"We talk mostly about provider and patient safety. We're standing up in back, so going over a speed bump while we're trying to do patient care is dangerous for us. It's also dangerous for patients. So I actually had a patient who was a big advocate of the speed bump on Old State Road, who happened to be a patient a couple weeks ago," she said. "They had a back injury, and though my driver was very careful going over the speed bump, they said, 'Oh my God, that's what it feels like back here.' It's a lot, and it's a safety issue for us. So we are here for safety. That's the point."

Weber said they'd also picked up a patient who had been outside on the ground for some time before being discovered. Her pulse and blood pressure were low, and there were concerns about moving her.

"So we were on Partridge Road, and my providers had to make the decision of going over the speed bumps and potentially putting her into cardiac arrest or coming all the way back around," she said. "So it does affect patient care significantly."

She made a point of asking the board if there could be a committee formed with first responders and residents to find the best options on how to reduce speeding in some areas. Weber said as a Swamp Road resident, she was blind to what was happening. 

"It's just that I think that we need to put more time in than just having somebody sit here and say, 'I want a speed bump,'" she said. "I think if we're able to put together some kind of committee that sits and has these conversations, and then hopefully, the board will have a representative, and give the recommendations to the board about what's safest."

The Select Board formed an ad hoc committee with Weber and Derksen volunteering and board members Jeff Walters and Jason Breault. Community members wanting to serve are being asked to submit citizens' interest form with the town prior to its first meeting.

Derksen said he has looked into radar signs that can cost a couple thousand dollars and that he can move the radar truck, that is currently on Bailey Road because of its speeding problem, to Swamp Road before winter.

With much of the conversation revolving around the speed bump at Old State Road needing to be removed, the board voted 3-1 to remove it, and also voted to look into adding one at the exit to the former mall, if that is public property. This will be left to the committee to decide.


Tags: speeding,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mass Voters Retain Recreational Cannabis, Tighten Gun Laws in Midterms

Staff ReportsiBerkshires

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— Massachusetts resoundingly voted to keep recreational cannabis and tighten gun laws during the midterm election on Tuesday. 

The Democratic Berkshire delegation was re-elected without contest, and unofficial results show Democratic incumbent Maura Healey taking more than 62 percent of the vote for Massachusetts governor over Republican challenger Michael Minogue. 
 
This coincides with the blue tsunami seen nationally during the midterms, with Democrats flipping seats across the United States and taking control of the House and Senate. 

Pittsfield has roughly 10 cannabis dispensaries, alongside several other retail operations and cultivation facilities in Berkshire County. At least three-quarters of the state voted against repealing the legalization that was passed 10 years ago. 

According to unofficial results, 46.89 percent of registered Pittsfield voters went to the polls. Pittsfield's 33,934 registered voters cast 15,913 votes, according to these results. 

As of Wednesday morning, with more than 85 percent of ballots counted, almost 76 percent of voters opposed Question 8, that would repeal the laws that legalize, regulate, and tax the retail sale of adult recreational use marijuana in Massachusetts. It was proposed by an initiative petition. 

Similarly, as of 10 a.m., 67 percent of Massachusetts voters have said "yes" on Question 9, which sustains several changes to Massachusetts laws governing firearms: adding school administrators and licensed healthcare providers as parties permitted to ask a court to issue an Extreme Risk Protection Order if an individual is a present danger to self or others, imposing penalties for possessing, creating, and transferring untraceable "ghost gun" firearms, and more. 

"At a time when the federal government is focused on the priorities of the gun lobby and rolling back national protections, the people of Massachusetts have reaffirmed our commitment to keeping our residents safe through proven, common-sense regulations," American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts President Jessica Tang said in a statement released late on Tuesday evening. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories