Pittsfield Council Delays Transfer of Former School Properties

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Hibbard has been closed since 2009 and the School Department is transferring it to the city. The City Council wants more discussion over its future and Morningside school's reuse.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council wants to engage in more conversation before releasing two former school properties for reuse. 

On Tuesday, councilors tabled the transfer of Hibbard School to the mayor and referred the same transfer of Morningside Community School to the Buildings and Maintenance subcommittee. 

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren took a hard stance against the petitions, wanting to ensure the council and its constituents are involved in each planning process. 

"Without conditions, my vote is no, no, no, absolutely not," he said about the proposed Hibbard transfer. 

Hibbard would be sold to an outside entity, and Morningside would be held in-house while Pittsfield determines its reuse; a police station is being explored. 

Last month, the School Committee voted to discontinue the former Hibbard School for educational use, and the administration is planning housing in its place. The order to the council was submitted with the "intention of transforming an underutilized property by repurposing the former school to create much-needed housing in the community." 

Charles E. Hibbard School opened in 1924 as an elementary school and served as such for 57 years until 1981, when it became the alternative education programs. The building at 280 Newell St. has not been used as a school since 2009, and the district has been storing supplies in it. 

In April, the School Committee voted to close Morningside Community School. A request for proposals was released last month for a police station design at 100 Burbank St., and the mayor's order says further information will be communicated once a designer has been selected. 

Mayor Peter Marchetti assured that the council would be involved in both processes, and that the designer would hold public meetings to hear from community members, per the usual process. 

"We may find that the cost of doing a police station far exceeds what we can do, so then we go back to the drawing board," Marchetti said. 



"Is it moving other city offices? I don't think that's the case. I think we're too far down a path for rearranging some other city offices, but it's another possibility of housing if a police station doesn't work. But that was the purpose of trying to, at first, get our ducks in a row." 

Warren is willing to vote for the property to become a police station in the right circumstances: if it can be built right, if some of the property can be used by the community, and if the price is right. 

He pointed out that the RFP places the final design in May 2027, and construction in the summer of 2027. 

"It does mention the City Council in the last line, but the heading says 'turn over to the mayor.' The RFP says 'turn it into a police station.' I'm not comfortable," he said about the Morningside petition. 

Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham, who petitioned to explore a police station in the recently closed Morningside school, encouraged his colleagues to pass its transfer. 

"I think we could probably do a 'yes and,' pass it so that the paper is in the right place, and then also refer it to committee and hopefully start that community discussion before we get the design, so that people are aware and are watching for the designer," he said. 

"And then, as a secondary effect, because people will be aware, it will hold the process accountable to having those meetings rather than announcing them a week before when people aren't aware." 

Councilor at Large Alisa Costa suggested sending this to the subcommittee for further discussion and community input. Ward 7 Councilor Kathy Moody made the motion. 

The council also accepted a communication from Superintendent Latifah Phillips notifying them that Hibbard and Morningside are no longer needed for use as schools, and to transfer their care and custody to the City of Pittsfield. 


Tags: school building,   school reuse,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Hopes for Continued Talks on Mall Sale

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is optimistic that talks for the Berkshire Mall sale will continue. 
 
Chair Deborah Maynard and Vice Chair Juli Baker were to meet with mall owner JMJ Holdings, the Baker Hill Road District, and proposed buyer Cypress Equities on Tuesday to discuss next steps. As of Wednesday, iBerkshires had received a "we are optimistic" from Maynard on the talks. The Berkshire Eagle reported a response from a Cypress representative saying talks will continue.  
 
Baker had updated the Select Board on Monday about the status of the sale and the efforts being undertaken by the renamed Baker Hill Economic District.
 
Cypress Equities pulled out of a purchase-and sale-agreement with mall owner JMJ last week for the following reasons. 
  • Not enough water service/pressure to the property to support redevelopment without constructing costly water tanks.
  • The current septic system and former treatment facility is not acceptable for a project of the scale and magnitude proposed.
  • There is existing asbestos and bad soil from the treatment system that needs to be remediated off site.
  • And the current structure and tax assessment of the Baker Hill Road District.
Baker has been working with what is now being called the Baker Hill Economic District and said she and the district members are happy that Cypress has decided to leave the door open to more discussions and that they have been working hard to try and address the company's needs.
 
Last month, the town had asked state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III to support the state Department of Transportation taking over the Connector Road, funding for a mall connection to Pittsfield's wastewater treatment plant and a connection to the town's water main.
 
Baker said an amendment has been drafted to cap the district's taxes to not grow more than 2.5 percent a year. She noted that, historically, taxes have not grown by more than one percent per year, so it won't be difficult to meet that cap.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories