Uncertainty Surrounds Dunkin' Donation of Pittsfield Church

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
Despite the withdrawal of a demolition plan, the fate of St. Mary's Church in Pittsfield remains murky.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — News of a possible reprieve for the former St. Mary the Morning Star Church caused a stir of reactions on Monday, but details remain opaque about the suggestion that the 72-year-old church building could potentially be donated to the city.
 
According to a press release sent out to local media by a publicist on behalf of Cafua Management Co., the Dunkin' Donuts franchisee is preparing a revised proposal for the Tyler Street property, which would maintain the main church building.
 
In this new proposal, which would presumably still involve the demolition of an adjacent rectory and potentially other structures on the 2.6-acre parcel, Cafua says the iconic former house of worship would be donated "to the City of Pittsfield, for use as the city deems appropriate."
 
"Our next step is to meet with the City Planner, present the plan to the public and pursue city approvals," said Gregory Nolan, chief development officer for Cafua, in Monday's statement. "The process will take time, but our aim is to ultimately do right by the community."
 
In fact, representatives from Cafua had already met with City Planner Cornelius J. Hoss just prior to the media announcement, though no discussion of the possibility of donating the church took place at that time.
 
"We met [Monday] to discuss their options, and after that discussion, they made the decision that it would be best to withdraw their plans for now, until they've had a chance to explore their options for the property," Hoss said.
 
At this time, the only official communication from the developer to city hall has been to withdraw their current site plan application.  
 
"No one has reached out to me at all," said Mayor Daniel Bianchi, of the possibility of donating the church to the city.
 
According to Cafua, though, the topic was already been broached with the city at Monday's meeting.
 
"We discussed donating the church with the city planner and other officials but no further plans have been made," contended Nolan, when reached for comment on Tuesday.  
 
"There will need to be some follow-up meetings before we present the plan to the public then we will work closely with the city for approvals. The process could take months," Nolan told iBerkshires.
 
The concept of Cafua's purchase of, and subsequent donation to the city, is a complicated one.
 
"We don't know the implications," Bianchi told iBerkshires on Tuesday. "We don't know that building that well, or what kind of liabilities might accrue to that property."
 
While Bianchi said the idea of a collaborative effort might be possible, it would be "a very poor move, on the part of the city" to take on the property alone.
 
"That would be an incredible burden on the taxpayers, just to absorb it," said the mayor.
 
"We would have to have a business plan that made sense," he added. "Logically, for the city, we would like to partner with an organization or a developer that wanted to do something. We would have to have a well-thought-out proposal.
 
"Obviously, the church has got a lot of problems. For them to knock it down, and remediate the land, would be a very, very costly thing. ... They're being smart businessmen, by trying to transfer the liability from the church to someone else."
 
Despite concerns, the mayor said he remains open to hearing from the developer on a revised proposal.
 
"I certainly am curious and anxious to hear what they have to say, and how creative and collaborative they're willing to be," Bianchi concluded. "Maybe we will find a developer with a really creative idea on how to reuse that building for a unique purpose."
 
Meanwhile, a planned public hearing before the city's Historical Commission on Oct. 7 has been canceled. In light of the application's withdrawal, and in the absence of any clear proposal at this time, the commission will defer on the issue for now, though it may be taken up again at the next regularly scheduled meeting in November.
 
"At that point, maybe there will be some more information, so that they can have more of a substantive discussion about how they can participate in the process," Hoss said.
 
While the commission would have no binding authority on the church property, which is too young to qualify for its review under the city's demolition delay ordinance, its members expressed keen interest in providing a forum to hear from concerned citizens, who in recent weeks have lobbied hard against the proposal, through petitionboycott efforts and hundreds of phone calls to both Cafua and the Springfield Diocese.
 
"The collective feedback from the residents of Pittsfield lead us to revise our plan," said Nolan. "We have and always will continue to listen to the needs and wants of the community and aim to do what's right."
 
"I'm so proud of the Pittsfield residents who really spoke from the heart," Bianchi said of the level of public action.

Tags: church reuse,   demolition,   Dunkin Donuts,   historical building,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Committee OKs $82M Budget, $1.5M Cuts

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school budget is less grim than the original proposal but still requires more than $1.5 million in cuts.

On Thursday, the School Committee approved an $82.8 million spending plan for fiscal year 2025, including a city appropriation of $80.4 million and $2.4 million in Chapter 70 funds.

The cuts made to balance the budget include about 50 staff reductions — some due to the sunsetting of federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds.

"The final version does not answer all needs. It will be unacceptable to some or to many but I must say that tonight's final proposal is very different than where we started when we believed we would have a $3,600,000 reduction. I want to assure everyone that every effort has been made to minimize the impact on both students, families, and staff members while also ensuring that our district has the necessary resources to progress forward," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"Nevertheless, there are incredibly passionate, dedicated staff members who will not be with us next year. This pains me as I've been a part of this organization for now 30 years so I want to assure everyone that our team, this has weighed very heavily in our hearts, this entire process. This is not a group of people that is looking at a spreadsheet saying ‘Well that can go and this can go’ and take that lightly."

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke and other officials worked with the state Department of Secondary and Elementary Education to rectify an error in the Chapter 70 funding formula, recognized 11 more low-income students in the district, and added an additional $2.4 million to the FY25 budget.

Curtis commented that when he first saw the governor’s FY25 budget, he was "rather stunned."

"The extraordinary circumstances we face this budget season by the conclusion of the substantial ESSER federal grant and a significant reduction in Chapter 70 allotment caused challenges for this team and our school principals and our educators and our staff that have been nothing short of all-consuming," he said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories