PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Board of Health Chairman Jay Green sees proposed changes to the city's trash collection system as a way to fight blight.
An internal working group has been working on the details of moving to an automated toter system for trash collection all summer. The plan is to provide city-issued totes — a 32-gallon one for trash and a 95-gallon one for recycling — to residents. Those totes will allow for Republic Services, the company that contracts with the city to collect the rubbish, the ability to use trucks with automated arms to do so.
Health Director Gina Armstrong sits on the internal working committee and told the Board of Health last week that the details are still being worked on. In May, another member of that working group said the plan would be more developed in "early summer" but the timeline for the final proposal had not been set. The working committee of city officials has been meeting regularly on sorting out the details.
"It is very comprehensive program and it is still in its development stages," Armstrong said.
The plan intrigues some members of the Board of Health members because of its help toward blight.
"This sounds to be that it will help with the blight issue we have," Green said. "This system sounds far more organized."
The containers are seen as ways to limit the amount of trash that gets spread across city streets on collection days. Currently, trash cans and bags are piled onto the sidewalks where animals and weather get to them. Additionally, the issuance of recycling totes, a limit on the amount of trash, and moving to a "single stream" system is eyed to increase the amount of recycling residents do. The city has a recycling rate of about 11 percent, and that is expected to triple once the program is in place.
"This new system would be a way of creating behavior change, be more of a green environment," Armstrong said.
Armstrong told the Board of Health that making the change will require "extensive public outreach and education" and the internal group is considering the best ways to do that. The internal committee is planning a long period of public engagement about the program before it goes live.
Armstrong said the city is also looking at additional staff to do enforcement of the program, which is eyed to be paid for through state funding.
Getting enough totes for city households was estimated to cost $1.8 million, a figure the city doesn't have in its budget nor does it have in the capital plan. Those involved say the city is looking for a grant from the Department of Environmental Protection. The group was applying for such a grant in June and hopes to hear back this fall.
Overall, early estimates have called for $87,000 per year in savings.
But, selling it to the City Council and the public isn't going to be easy. This marks the third attempt the city has considered to make a major overhaul of the system. So far, the plans have failed to receive the council votes to do so.
What is likely going to be of much debate is limiting the amount of trash a resident can throw away. The early recommendations of the plan call for residents to be limited to the 32-gallon tote for free and if there is more trash than what fits, the homeowner would have to buy bags from the city. Or, residents could be allowed to purchase extra totes.
Such things as the prices for the overflow bags are being worked out internally, Armstrong said.
Green said additional bags for the transfer station in North Adams, where he used to work, were inexpensive. Board of Health member Steve Smith suggested residents buy many bags just to keep around the house for those instances.
Mayor Linda Tyer touted the implementation of such a system in her budget proposal and so far it continues to remain on the front burner for many city officials. The discussion has been ongoing since last September. Details of the most recent proposal should be rolling out soon.
A proposal to change the way residential trash is collected is heading to the City Council. The Resource and Recovery Committee on Wednesday passed a favorable recommendation on Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo's petition to switch to a totter system.
Covanta is expected to remain open now that the City Council has granted the waste to energy facility $562,000 to help with capital repairs. The council on Tuesday approved the expenditure from the Pittsfield Economic Development Fund.
The group looking at a possible overhaul of the city's trash collection is putting nearly everything on the table. The Resource Recovery Committee met for its second thing this month in its ongoing look into changing the way the trash system operates.
The city is once again considering changing the way curbside trash is collected Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo has filed a petition to require the use of a toter system.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more