image description

Adams Board of Health Sets Permit Cap on Tobacco Sales

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
ADAMS, Mass. — The Board of Health finally passed a tobacco permit cap after months of discussion that will go into action Oct. 1.
 
After multiple amendments and information sessions, the Board of Health approved the new regulation last wee that would set an initial cap of 12 tobacco sales permits in Adams.
 
"We have a cap," Chairman David Rhoads said. "Thank you all very much."
 
Late last year, the Board of Health agreed to implement a new regulation that would limit the amount of tobacco sales permits allowed in town. 
 
Originally the board planned to set the cap at 11 but decided to change this after hearing from the public. Many who called in feared the cap would limit possible new businesses from coming into town.
 
"I think we have to be careful to not dissuade new businesses, and I am not opposed to increasing it," board member Laura Grandchamp said.  
 
Board member Peter Hoyt also voted in favor, but he said he did not think the cap would do "damage" to business in Adams.
 
The cap would eventually ramp down to nine. This is in line with the one per 1,000 capita guide the board decided to work with.
 
Businesses with existing permits would still be able to sell their businesses with their permit, but once a permit is revoked or retired, it will be gone forever.
 
Right now there are 10 existing permits. The two additional permits allowed would be eliminated if not used within the next two years. In October 2021, one permit would be eliminated if left unused. This would also be the case for the second in October 2022.
 
The new regulation also includes a 500-foot buffer for newly permitted establishments. They must be this far away from schools, playgrounds, athletic fields, and other permitted establishments.    
 
Before the vote, the board opened up the hearing to the public.
 
Tri-Town Health Director James Wilusz spoke said the adult smoking rate in Adams is 26.2 percent. The state average is 13.7 percent.
 
He said 130 municipalities in the commonwealth have set caps. In Berkshire County, North Adams, Lee, Lenox, Pittsfield, Great Barrington, Stockbridge, Williamstown, and Lanesborough have all set caps.
 
Joyce Brewer, program manager for the Berkshire Tobacco-Free Community Partnership and an Adams resident, said smoking is still the No. 1 cause of preventable death in America.
 
"We can do better for the kids growing up in our community," she said. "If we cap and reduce the number of tobacco sales available, we can decrease the exposure to young people."
 
D.J. Wilson, public health liaison with the Massachusetts Municipal Association, said the Board of Health was taking a step in the right direction and added it is hard to keep up with the tobacco industry because it is constantly creating new products.
 
He added that the cap would be a good thing for existing businesses because it would limit competition. 
 
There were more voices in opposition to the cap. Selectman and Board of Health liaison James Bush said the cap was not a good fit for Adams and would hurt potential incoming business. 
 
"Our downtown district is very small to start with, and we just can't do this," Bush said. "I understand what you are trying to do, but it isn't going to work ... We just can't afford to do this in the town of Adams."
 
He also felt that the hefty fine would already be enough to deter businesses from selling to kids. He said it was parents' responsibility to make sure their kids aren't smoking.
 
Business owner Pierre Kareh agreed and said he did not think the cap would really change anything. He felt the responsibility should lie with the parents.
 
"From my point of view as a business owner ... I think it has to fall back on the parents who have to raise their kids," he said. "We think we can take that off the parents' shoulders."
 
Selectman and longtime smoker Richard Blanchard agreed that the town should do all it can to limit underage smoking, but he felt, in reality, the cap would make no difference.
 
"As a smoker for 41 years I guarantee you if you limit where I can buy it I am still going to buy it somewhere," he said. "I don't care if I have to travel and another couple of minutes."
 
He said the cap would only "curb growth" in town. 
 
The vote was unanimous.

 


Tags: BOH,   tobacco regulations,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Special Minerals Agrees to Pay Adams, River Groups Over River Discharge

Staff ReportsiBerkshires

Adams plans to use the $50,000 it will get in the consent decree toward the removal of the Peck's Road Dam. 
BOSTON — Specialty Minerals is expected to pay $299,000 for a discharge of calcium carbonate into the Hoosic River nearly three years ago in a consent decree with the Attorney General's Office. 
 
The river turned visibly white from Adams to the Vermont state line from the mineral that leaked out from the plant's settling ponds on Howland Avenue in November 2021. 
 
Calcium carbonate, also known as chalk or limestone, is not toxic to humans or animals. However, the sudden discoloration of the water alarmed local officials and environmentalists and prompted an emergency session of the Northern Berkshire Regional Emergency Planning Committee. 
 
"We allege that this company violated its permits, disregarded federal and state law, and put the Hoosic River — a resource cherished by the Adams community — at risk," said AG Andrea Campbell in a statement. "I am grateful for this collaboration with our state agency partners and committed to holding polluters accountable and working to bring resources back to communities disproportionately impacted by environmental harms."   
 
If approved by the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, the consent decree will require Specialty Minerals to pay a total of $299,000, which includes payments to the town of Adams and three community groups in Northern Berkshire County that will be used to benefit water quality and prevent stormwater impacts. 
 
Once approved, most of the settlement would fund multiple projects to benefit water quality, including infrastructure improvements and native plantings to mitigate stormwater impacts in the Hoosic River Watershed. Specifically, the proposed settlement provides for: 
  • $50,000 to the town of Adams for infrastructure improvements in a tributary of the Hoosic River
  • $50,000 to Hoosic River Revival for stormwater mitigation projects  
  • $50,000 to Hoosic River Watershed Association for a native plant garden and other projects to mitigate stormwater impacts and benefit water quality 
  • $50,000 to Sonrisas to fund invasive plant removal and native plant habitat establishment at Finca Luna Búho, a community land project that centers the voices and prioritizes the decision-making of those living in marginalization. 
It will also provide $30,000 in civil assessments to the state's Natural Heritage Endangered Species Fund and $20,000 in civil penalties for violation of state law, as well as $49,000 to offset the costs of the AG's enforcement efforts. 
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories