The Insurance Guy: Who Doesn't Love Homeowners Insurance?

By David BissailloniBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
In recent columns, we touched upon the importance of insuring buildings at proper limits, why it makes sense to spend a bit of time reviewing your auto and homeowners insurance, and what discounts and benefits are now available in a very competitive Massachusetts auto insurance marketplace. 

This month, I want to talk a bit about one of the products in the insurance world that I had always thought was actually a pretty good deal. Welcome to the HO-3 policy.

More than just because the bank tells you that you must have a homeowners policy when you carry a mortgage, the homeowners plan is a smart way to manage risk by paying pennies on the dollar to protect your assets. First and foremost, the policy steps in if there is damage to your home that occurs from a few of the obvious causes of loss.

Most people would agree that damage from a fire would be the first job that a homeowners policy would perform. And that is true. If your home suffers partial or total damage from a fire, there is no better way to make you whole again than by having a properly written homeowners policy in place. And whether that premium is $500 or $1,200, if it affords you a couple of hundred thousand dollars in protection, it is a very good return on your premium. Not that I would wish a fire on anyone.

Wind damage is also typically covered by a homeowners policy and we know some of the damage that wind has done lately. Typically, water damage is not covered unless you have a separate flood policy, which can be a confusing topic for consumers. (We will cover water and flood in a separate column soon). However, you can have limited coverage added to your policy that may reimburse you for backup of water in a basement. Again, you really should consult your local agent.

The homeowners policy will also provide coverage to other structures such as detached garages, sheds, and other buildings that you may have on your property. It may also provide you, at the time of a loss, with compensation to provide temporary food and shelter that your family may need if you cannot remain in the home. These are benefits that become very important if you are ever involved in a serious loss at your home.


The homeowners policy also provides the insured with liability protection in case there is bodily injury or property damage done to a third party. This is where legal bills and damages may be paid from in the case of someone getting injured on your property, or being bit by your dog, or accidentally hit with a stray golf ball from your hooked drive at the golf course. There is also a medical payment portion of the policy where small medical bills can be paid to injured parties. The homeowners policy can be a very powerful tool when things hit the fan.

You may notice that there is an increase in the pricing on many homeowners policies, but it still remains a very good value for the consumer. There are a few reasons for the increase in pricing, primarily the fact that 2011 was a record year for catastrophes throughout the world. According to the Insurance Information Institute, worldwide events caused $350 billion in economic losses, shattering the 2005 record of $230 billion. The other primary reason is that the cost of rebuilding homes has gone up. According to Travelers Insurance, in the last year paint has gone up 4.5 percent, copper pipe up 19 percent, wire and cabling up 19.4 percent, insulation up 12.3 percent, and asphalt shingles up 8.3 percent.

But, there remain great deals out there if you are willing to spend some time and work with a local independent insurance agent. Happy home owning.

Dave Bissaillon dabbles in real life while working daily as an account executive at Smith Bros.-McAndrews Insurance Agency in Adams. His occasional column will touch on insurance and other fun stuff.

Tags: homeowners insurance,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories