image description
Brian Graber of American Rivers runs through the dam-removal project's checklist of DEP guidelines at a Conservation Commission hearing.

Briggsville Dam Slated for Removal This Summer

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Graber said his group has removed some 800 dams across the country to restore natural habitats.
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — The removal of the Briggsville Dam will likely begin in late July or in August, after the spawning season of the protected longnose sucker.

Representatives from the state and from American Rivers, a conservation group representing dam owner Cascade School Supplies, presented plans to the Conservation Commission on Wednesday night and laid out a time line for removal of the dilapidated dam.

"Removing dams is really our No. 1 river-restoration tool around the country," said Brian Graber, director of American Rivers' river restoration program. "Almost 800 dams have been removed around the country and I believe this will be the ninth in Massachusetts."

The aged dam that once powered the Strong-Hewat Woolen Mill has been deemed a safety hazard by state engineers and the cost to bring it up to safety standards have been pegged at $700,000 or more. Removing it and restoring the flow of the river will cost between $400,000 and $500,000.

Funding is being provided from sources including American Rivers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife and the federal Natural Resources Conservation Service.

About 10,920 cubic yards of sediment and rock built up over the past 20 years will be removed; about 1,000 cubic yards of larger material (15 inches or greater in diameter) will be repositioned, most in a flat section of the river bed near the Cross Road Bridge to slow the water and provide pools for fish. The rest will be hauled to Clarksburg Construction Co. for use in commercial projects.

The concrete dam will be taken down in three sections but the gear housing near the mill, now owned by Cascade, will be left in place as an historic marker. No road closures are expected as the work will be done at two access points on the river. That will include using private property; one parcel was donated to the town by the Bonas, the other requires a formal agreement for access.


A natural stone baffle will replace the concrete dam. Right, a longnose sucker.
Removing the dam and the small-scale sediment will improve the flow and the water quality of the North Branch of the Hoosic River, creating a more suitable habitat for longnose suckers and 13 other species including brook, brown and rainbow trout. Invasive plants will be disposed of off-site and replaced with native plants.

The project will proceed slowly and carefully over a period of six to eight weeks, said Nick Wildman, priority projects coordinator of the state's Division of Ecological Restoration. The construction will be monitored and assessed by licensed designer engineering firm Milone & MacBroom of Cheshire, Conn.


"From a fish standpoint, we didn't want to come into this and pump the stream down," he said. "If we move the project slowly, we'll allow natural movement of the fish."

If they have to be moved, it will be overseen by Dana Ohman, an aquatic biologist with the state's Division of Fisheries and Wildlife.

The some commissioners were less concerned with the fish and more with the safety of the Cross Road Bridge and nearby homes that would affected if the dam collapsed.

"Everything is in place so nothing catastrophic can go wrong and take the bridge out? Right?" asked commission member Debra LeFave, also chairman of the Selectmen.

Wildman said the state Highway Department had signed off on the project but borings will be taken to assure that the material under the anchoring hasn't moved.

"We've learned a lot mostly over the last 20 years, in how to proceed with these projects," said Graber. "We're extremely careful with all the analysis and design ... there's two years of analysis in this site."

Lauren Stevens of Stamford, Vt., representing Hoosic River Watershed Association, said his group "strongly endorsed" the project.

"We think it's terrific both for the fish and we think it will be a very attractive feature for the town," he said.

The project has received a waiver from the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act review but requires several more permits and acknowledgment letters from state and federal agencies before proceeding.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Clarksburg Stories