image description
Teachers' association President Susan Chilson said the union members 'must abide by the rules of their working agreement; they only expect that the same courtesy be offered in return.'

North Adams Needs $396,000 to Fund Insurance Trust

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Councilor Gailanne Cariddi questioned whether the city should accept the study or do an audit.
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The city may have to ask the Legislature for more time to come up with the $396,000 needed to fully fund the self-insurance trust for this fiscal year.

The state Department of Revenue has informed the city that it must make the payment, Mayor Richard Alcombright told the City Council on Tuesday night.

"I have no idea where it will come from, but the Department of Revenue said we must fund it for 2010," he said. "But we may need special legislation to push it into next year or to push it out further".

The study that came out last week showed the city had underfunded the trust by some $1.1 million over 2008 and 2009, a situation that has spilled into fiscal 2010. The city's public unions have claimed their own analysis shows the city shorted the fund by $1.8 million over three years.

Both Councilors Gailanne Cariddi and Michael Bloom called for more extensive audits.

Cariddi was concerned that the mayor was moving forward with negotiations with the union and state on the sole basis of the study. "You seem to be going in a direction like this is the last document we're going to hear."


Mayor Richard Alcombright
Related Stories
• North Adams to Open Insurance Talks With Unions
• North Adams Council Rejects Insurance Review
• Barrett Challenges Unions on GIC, Insurance Trust
• North Adams Researching Insurance Claims
Report: North Adams Underfunded Insurance Fund by $1.1M
Bloom said an audit would put the issue to rest. "People are asking where the council was on this," he said. "There was a management decision made at some point not to fund it properly."

An audit would cost upwards of $40,000 to $50,000 compared to the $2,500 for the two-year study, said Alcombright, and wouldn't likely show anything different than what the study has.

In fact, previous audits hadn't shown any underfunding since they were focused on ensuring that claims going out were being covered by premiums coming in. The city paid its insurance bills, said Alcombright, but what it hadn't done was fully pay its share of the premiums as required by state law. In failing to do so, it had also left the fund short in case of runout, or claims coming in after the fiscal year, should it decide to switch to a different insurance.

The mayor also wanted to refute several assertions in a recent article (and editorial) in the North Adams Transcript, including one that the accounting was a matter of creative financing.

"'Creative financing,' I got a big kick out of that," he said. "Mass General Law governs the payments on the self-insured trust. You cannot be creative with Mass General Law."

Both Cariddi and Alcombright referred to a letter DOR sent to Wareham when that town asked last fall if could just pay costs this year. DOR's answer was a firm no: "We have interpreted GL c. 32B, 53A as requiring that the town contribute a specific percentage of the previously determined premium or rate amount, at least by year end."


Councilor David Bond: 'I am ashamed of the findings.'
The law, Chapter 32B, Section A, does not appear to include any penalties, said Alcombright. The city is working on changing its accounting practices and is in talks with the unions on how to proceed. It may have to offer a premium holiday or make a one-time payment into the trust fund.

Councilor David Bond waited until councilor's concerns to read a statement expressing his anger and embarrassment over the situation.

"This promises to be one of the most difficult budgets to balance and now have a very cumbersome and difficult expense ... What else is out there and what else is the city liable for?

"I am ashamed by the findings in this report and the further malfeasance that may be out there."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Why the Massachusetts Art Community Is Worth Continued Investment

By James BirgeGuest Column
How do we quantify the value of art on society and culture? Even eye-popping figures, like the $100 million estimate for the jewels stolen from the Louvre, or the record auction last fall that saw a piece by Gustav Klimt sell for more than $236 million can't fully account for the value of the history, stories, and emotions behind the creations themselves. But beyond that, there is a measurable financial, cultural and social benefit of the arts that is often taken for granted. 

Closer to home, arts and cultural production in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts totals nearly $30 billion annually, representing more than 4 percent of the state's economic output, according to the Mass Cultural Council. All told, more than 130,000 jobs are spread across the commonwealth creating a vibrant and thriving artistic community for us all to enjoy. 

Despite the obvious impact, these figures are under threat. A recent survey by MassCreative compiled recent federal cuts to the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Institute of Museum and Library Services and identified 63 grants canceled and $4.2 million in grant funding rescinded across New England so far this year. 

The dollars, of course, are important. But they also only scratch the surface on what they bring to the community. Today, we risk losing part of the culture and identity many now take for granted. 

While others choose to look past these less tangible, but just as vital benefits, we're doing the opposite. Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts is all in to ensure the next generation retains their access to works of art, while also being empowered to create themselves. 

Last fall, MCLA officially broke ground on the new Campagna Kleefeld Center for Creativity in the Arts, which will serve as a new hub for the campus and the local community for arts programming. When complete in fall of 2027, our students will benefit, but so will all of Berkshire County and artists in the surrounding area. 

This exciting new facility is just one of the many forthcomings our region can enjoy in the coming years. Just a few miles away, anticipation builds for the Fall 2027 anticipated opening for the Williams College Museum of Art. Years in the making, the museum likewise grows from an enduring commitment to the arts, both in curriculum and in practice. Exciting times are also underway for the Clark Art Institute with the construction of a new facility to house a collection of 331 works of art, including paintings, sculptures, drawings and other works. Their wing is scheduled for completion in 2028. And listeners will no doubt enjoy the sounds and melodies from Mass MoCA Records, the latest endeavor to foster creativity and artistic pursuits through music launched in October as well. Of course, many are also awaiting the reopening of the Berkshire Museum anticipated this summer, after a tremendous renovation process to rejuvenate the experience for visitors. 

So much time, energy, and yes, dollars, have already been invested in taking these facilities from ideas and sketches and making them reality. But they represent much more than new buildings. They represent new opportunities to cultivate and accelerate the thriving arts community in Massachusetts and the northern Berkshires. 

Art, regardless of the medium, is a reflection of who we are, where we've been, and what we aspire to be. It can be inspired by hopes or fears and chronicle collective triumphs as well as tribulations. The goal of art is not only to document history, but to inspire those positioned to change it and to feel something new or even to provoke us to revisit our own assumptions or misconceptions. 

As unfathomable of a number as $30 billion can seem, boiling down the impact to any number inherently discounts the unknowable downstream effects our graduates will bring to the community and the broader world after they leave our institutions. Likewise, rescinding $4.2 million now removes a huge chunk of that growth potential.  

Justification for making these investments today when simply boiled down to dollars and cents still places us on solid ground strictly from a financial perspective that forgoes all of the intangible, but no less valuable, benefits as well.  

The arts are still worth our support. And our community will be richer for it. 

James Birge, PhD, is president of Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts in North Adams.  

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories