image description
More than 100 people gathered for a special Selectmen's meeting to address the Main Street reconstruction project.

Great Barrington Residents, Businesses Concerned About Reconstruction

By Nichole DupontiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
GREAT BARRINGTON, Mass. — More than 100 people gathered at the Claire Teague Senior Center for a special Selectmen's meeting to discuss the latest plans for the Main Street reconstruction project.

The $4.2 million project, which could begin in 2013, is approaching the end of its 25 percent design phase. According to project director Jon Dietrich of Fuss & O’Neill, the West Springfield consulting firm for the reconstruction, once the state Department of Transportation has accepted the preliminary design, there will be a public forum that could happen as early as January.


Marvin Lieberman, owner of Great Barrington Bagel Co., expressed concern that the project could threaten tourism.
“It’s a simple goal but a complex goal from an engineering and functional standpoint,” he said. “There are various needs in order for downtown to improve and for there to be safety and mobility and access to businesses.”

In fact, business was the primary concern among those residents and business owners in attendance. Marvin Lieberman, owner of Great Barrington Bagel Co., said the proposed project is a major cause for concern because it could threaten the town’s tourist-based economy.

“We are a tourist economy and we need the tourist economy to be successful,” he said. “This could really damage that.”

Other business owners and residents echoed Lieberman’s concerns. Resident David Lewis said more should be done to estimate the economic cost to the town before the project is finalized.

“What is the negative economic impact going to be on this community?” he asked. “How much lost revenue will there be? Great Barrington survived this economic recession and this could be a huge road block. How do you even qualify this?”

Barton Raser, owner of Carr Hardware on Main Street, while not able to answer these questions directly, did present some alarming statistics from two of the five other Carr Hardware locations; one in North Adams and the other in Watervliet, N.Y.

“We have two stores in towns which have undergone street renovations and construction,” he said. “In Watervliet we had 95,000 customers a year before the street reconstruction. Now, we have 40,000. Even though the construction is done, we’ve had a 40 percent drop in sales and we’ve yet to see any bounce back. In North Adams, where there is the bridge project happening, we’ve had a 22 percent drop in year one and a 20 percent drop in year two.”

In addition to the drop in sales, Raser also cited job loss as a consequence of construction projects in the two towns, saying that in Watervliet, the store reduced its staff from 15 to 4.5 and in North Adams from 8.5 to 5 jobs.

“What we’ve learned, despite everyone’s best intentions, is that a project like this has to be minimally invasive, otherwise the customers won’t come back because it’s not convenient,” he said. “We’ve got a good thing going here. This project could jeopardize that.”

Selectwoman Deb Phillips said minimal cosmetic fixes would not be beneficial to anyone.

“We need to fix the sidewalks because they’re dangerous. The roads need to be resurfaced. It’s not about simply fixing the sidewalks or simply milling the road,” she said. “We have the opportunity to do something that needs to be done. Different people in this room have different priorities.”

The town’s top priority, said longtime resident Nick Stanton, should be livability, not quicker through-traffic.

“Traffic efficiency at the expense of livability is not going to be acceptable,” he said. “Our decisions should be based on three categories; imperative, important and optional.”

For more information on the Main Street reconstruction visit www.townofgb.org.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Great Barrington Stories