image description
More than 100 people gathered for a special Selectmen's meeting to address the Main Street reconstruction project.

Great Barrington Residents, Businesses Concerned About Reconstruction

By Nichole DupontiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
GREAT BARRINGTON, Mass. — More than 100 people gathered at the Claire Teague Senior Center for a special Selectmen's meeting to discuss the latest plans for the Main Street reconstruction project.

The $4.2 million project, which could begin in 2013, is approaching the end of its 25 percent design phase. According to project director Jon Dietrich of Fuss & O’Neill, the West Springfield consulting firm for the reconstruction, once the state Department of Transportation has accepted the preliminary design, there will be a public forum that could happen as early as January.


Marvin Lieberman, owner of Great Barrington Bagel Co., expressed concern that the project could threaten tourism.
“It’s a simple goal but a complex goal from an engineering and functional standpoint,” he said. “There are various needs in order for downtown to improve and for there to be safety and mobility and access to businesses.”

In fact, business was the primary concern among those residents and business owners in attendance. Marvin Lieberman, owner of Great Barrington Bagel Co., said the proposed project is a major cause for concern because it could threaten the town’s tourist-based economy.

“We are a tourist economy and we need the tourist economy to be successful,” he said. “This could really damage that.”

Other business owners and residents echoed Lieberman’s concerns. Resident David Lewis said more should be done to estimate the economic cost to the town before the project is finalized.

“What is the negative economic impact going to be on this community?” he asked. “How much lost revenue will there be? Great Barrington survived this economic recession and this could be a huge road block. How do you even qualify this?”

Barton Raser, owner of Carr Hardware on Main Street, while not able to answer these questions directly, did present some alarming statistics from two of the five other Carr Hardware locations; one in North Adams and the other in Watervliet, N.Y.

“We have two stores in towns which have undergone street renovations and construction,” he said. “In Watervliet we had 95,000 customers a year before the street reconstruction. Now, we have 40,000. Even though the construction is done, we’ve had a 40 percent drop in sales and we’ve yet to see any bounce back. In North Adams, where there is the bridge project happening, we’ve had a 22 percent drop in year one and a 20 percent drop in year two.”

In addition to the drop in sales, Raser also cited job loss as a consequence of construction projects in the two towns, saying that in Watervliet, the store reduced its staff from 15 to 4.5 and in North Adams from 8.5 to 5 jobs.

“What we’ve learned, despite everyone’s best intentions, is that a project like this has to be minimally invasive, otherwise the customers won’t come back because it’s not convenient,” he said. “We’ve got a good thing going here. This project could jeopardize that.”

Selectwoman Deb Phillips said minimal cosmetic fixes would not be beneficial to anyone.

“We need to fix the sidewalks because they’re dangerous. The roads need to be resurfaced. It’s not about simply fixing the sidewalks or simply milling the road,” she said. “We have the opportunity to do something that needs to be done. Different people in this room have different priorities.”

The town’s top priority, said longtime resident Nick Stanton, should be livability, not quicker through-traffic.

“Traffic efficiency at the expense of livability is not going to be acceptable,” he said. “Our decisions should be based on three categories; imperative, important and optional.”

For more information on the Main Street reconstruction visit www.townofgb.org.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Berkshire Concrete Lawsuit Seeks Damages, Continued Operation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — Whether Berkshire Concrete can continue excavating after its permit was denied —and if the town is liable for damages — will be decided in a lawsuit the company has filed against the town, planning board and its members.
 
The suit was filed on behalf of Berkshire Concrete Corp., a subsidiary of Petricca Industries, by Jaan G. Rannik of Cohen Kinne Valicenti & Cook in Superior Court on April 13
 
Berkshire Concrete is suing for damages and wants the Planning Board's permit denial overturned.
 
The company seeks permission to operate on its entire property, and to have any future permit applications granted — unless they violate previous permit conditions and fail to fix them after formal written notice, or if the Mine Safety and Health Administration finds a public health danger requiring new restrictions.
 
It also requests that if a future renewal is denied for a violation and Berkshire Concrete disputes it or claims it didn't have time to fix, operations can continue until a  final decision is made.
 
The company claims the town breached its 1992 contract with Berkshire Concrete and the board exceeded its authority in denying the special permit. 
 
Berkshire Concrete claims that as a direct result of the town's breach of contract it suffered damages of no less than 1.9 million and will continue to incur additional damages. 
 
View Full Story

More Great Barrington Stories