Letter: Time for Pittsfield to Say Yes to CPA

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I'm writing to urge Pittsfield citizens to vote yes on Question 5. When we are open minded, study the facts, figures and multiple examples of success stories, it is a natural conclusion that Pittsfield would benefit immensely from [Community Preservation Act's] adoption. It is time to say yes.

Question 5 has been embraced across all sectors of the Pittsfield community, in a groundswell of support from civic organizations, private businesses, and community leaders that support adoption of the Community Preservation Act in Pittsfield, and with good reason: CPA is a clear win for those communities that adopt it, economically and socially. In addition to transforming struggling and once-blighted neighborhoods, quality housing initiatives supported by CPA have created over 5,000 construction-related jobs directly, and through indirect impact added another 6,000 estimated jobs with over $150 million dollars in new revenue for local governments.

An additional 10,000 high-paying jobs have been generated in the rehabilitation of historic properties by CPA funding, preserving the beloved structures that help give a community its identity while retrofitting it to a landscape that's competitively ready for commercial activity of all kinds.


It's impact on parks and open spaces in the commonwealth has been extraordinary: over 23,000 acres of parkland, farmland, forestland have been acquired or preserved. It's enabled towns to build needed dog parks, skate parks, playgrounds, athletic fields. It's lead to the creation of hundreds of new assets and programs for youth recreation.

Out of over 160 towns and cities that have adopted in Massachusetts, not one municipality has ever repealed it. That's because the Community Preservation Act is a piece of legislation that actually does what it says. It preserves communities. It preserves neighborhood fabric. It preserves the distinct landscape that makes us who we are, and helps optimize those assets to position Pittsfield as a promising community with a high quality of life, that's ripe for commercial growth. Perhaps most importantly, it provides hope. Hope for all manner of worthy projects that many residents support and believe in, things like new, healthy youth recreational programming that we desperately need in this city.

Adopting the Community Preservation Act is a crucial step that we need to take, and an exceedingly small price to pay, to help get us back on track to having the thriving community that so many of us want and deserve.

Sara Clement
Pittsfield, Mass.

 

 


Tags: ballot measure,   CPA,   election 2016,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Seeks State Support for Berkshire Mall Redevelopment

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires.com
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town plans to petition the state to take ownership of the Route 7/Route 8 Connector Road, which officials believe is a "critical component" of the Berkshire Mall’s redevelopment strategy.
 
On Tuesday, the Select Board approved a letter to state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III to request their support for the vacant mall's redevelopment by helping advance transfer of the Route 7/Route 8 connector and considering funding for essential infrastructure.
 
"We have held discussions with the Baker Hill Road District … which will take the necessary steps to formally petition the commonwealth to take over ownership of the Route 7, Route 8 connector…Your continued support in facilitating this transfer is greatly appreciated," the letter says. 
 
Berkshire Mall owner JMJ RE Holdings has said the potential sale and redevelopment of the mall hinges on dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, a condition of the agreement that, if unmet, would render the contract null and void.
 
As a result, the mall will continue to deteriorate and the litigation will proceed forward, said Tim Grogan, of JMJ. 
 
Vera Farrell, the liaison to the Baker Hill Road District, said the district board had discussed at one of its most recent meetings that the connector road could be transferred directly to the state, rather than returned to the town; Barrett and Mark were also a part of the discussion.
 
"The representatives recommended that as an option, that it could transfer the connector road directly to the state, as opposed to deeding it back to the town to dispense it. If we get to that point, that would be a better option to do it that way," Farrell said. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories