PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Before attending Tuesday's City Council meeting Debbie Vall dropped someone off in a wooded area of the city with a tent.
It was all she could do for the homeless man. There weren't any shelters available, no temporary housing. And off he went, exposed to the rain that has been drenching the county for the last few days.
"What I am concerned about is immediate shelter," Vall, who is the assistant director at the Christian Center said.
In just the last two weeks, Vall said a family of five came into the center with no place to go. Four people reported that they were camping out at the Common. Two people were sleeping in cars. One person was sleeping in the woods and three people were squatting in abandoned houses. And those are just the ones who had gone to the Christian Center for help. Just a few weeks ago, Superintendent of Schools Jason McCandless reported that there are 47 city students currently homeless.
It isn't an issue that has gone unnoticed in the city as residents have more and more homeless people camping out in various locations. Often city residents will call Ward 1 Councilor Helen Moon and ask, "what is the city doing about this?"
For a while, she would respond by telling them about the countywide organizations working on the homeless issue, but she never had much to specifically say the city was doing.
Until recently.
"I was proud to respond that we are making a homeless committee," Moon said.
Moon knew the issue well when she worked on North Street and has certainly noticed the number of homeless people camping out in her ward, specifically in Springside Park. Earlier this year she was contacted by Edward Carmel, who had spent some time living on the streets, asking the same question so many others asked Moon. And he wanted to do something. He proposed the committee and Moon and Councilor at Large Melissa Mazzeo gladly filed a petition to reactive a dormant committee for homelessness.
Having been there before, Carmel knows the physical and mental struggles the homeless population goes through. He knows so many of them and still sees them on the street when he stopped and chats with them. He also knows how difficult it is for them to walk into a big social service agency and ask for help. For all of 2018, this homeless committee being formed to do something to help each and every one of those people became Carmel's passion.
"We can't prevent what we already have, homeless. But we can prevent future homeless," Carmel said.
On Tuesday, the committee received its final approval from the City Council. It is now up to the mayor to make the appointments and get it going. Mazzeo said there is some urgency because "winter is coming" and the Ordinance and Rules subcommittee had already expedited the formation of it.
While the committee is being reactivated with unanimous support, Councilor at Large Pete White said it isn't the only thing the city is doing. He said a "significant amount of money" for years has been spent from the federal Community Development Block Grant to support shelters and organizations. But this committee is a chance to do something different.
Councilor Vice President John Krol agrees with the committee saying it can enhance the current efforts being done and come up with "innovative" solutions.
"This is an opportunity to think much differently and if there are things that haven't been tried here but have been in other communities and have worked, we should go for it," Krol said.
Alicia Costa is the director of Working Cities and she tells the same story as Vall and she says, "these are people I know and care about and it is a horrible feeling when they ask me because I can't help them." Costa doesn't believe the homeless issues can be solved by one organization or one individual.
Costa said it needs more than just the social workers or just the housing organizations — it is going to require the city as a collective body to solve it.
With the committee reactivated, she believes solving the issue can and will happen.
"We can tackle this issue together and then we can say 'remember when we had a homeless problem but we solved it together,'" Costa said.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.
JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall.
Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting.
JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.
Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.
The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.
"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."
The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed.
"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."
JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road.
District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.
The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.
After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.
Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall.
There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.
The Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires held its ninth annual nonprofit awards last week honoring the contributions of those who have helped the community in their own way. click for more
Jason Codey struck out 13, walked two and allowed just an infield single as the Generals earned a 7-1 win over Wahconah to claim their third straight regional title. click for more