image description
Thomas Coupack appealed to the Board of Health. The board opted to enforce the fine but will hold the suspension in abeyance.

Pittsfield Cumberland Farms Slapped With Tobacco Violation

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — After two violations of its tobacco retail license, the managers from Cumberland Farms on First Street say tobacco products will not be sold at all unless the customer has identification.
 
The city is imposing a $350 fine on the convenience store but is holding the seven-day suspension in abeyance, meaning it will be enforced only if there is another violation.
 
Health Director Gina Armstrong said there was a violation in March 2017 and that in November 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ran a compliance check and found another violation. Lastly, the Tri-Town Health Department found a violation in January of this year.
 
Armstrong said the violations included selling to minors and having clerks not certified to sell tobacco products doing so. She isn't sure what the FDA violation is because that data hasn't been released.
 
Nonetheless, there are two violations to the license and by code that would require a seven-day license suspension and a $350 fine. A third violation would result in a 14-day license suspension and a $500 fine. 
 
Cumberland Farms appealed the violation. The managers didn't deny the violations but outlined a series of mitigating steps it had taken to ensure it doesn't happen again. 
 
Regional Manager Thomas Coupack said the biggest thing was that they've taken the discretion of whether to ask for identification or not away. He said in the point of sale system there was an option to just click "of age" for products requiring identification that was used to speed up the process. That has now been disabled so clerks have to scan an identification or, if it is faded and won't scan, hand punch the birthday into the system.
 
"We've disabled that 'of age' ability. It will stop somebody from overriding the system," Coupack said.
 
He said the policy was implemented immediately when the company got the letter informing them of the violation. He said the policy does create issues with lines and with people who do not have identification cards. But, he said in other stores it has been implemented there hadn't been other violations.
 
A second aspect is that the employees weren't trained. Armstrong said it isn't just that one particular clerk sold tobacco products without being certified to do so but that "only a small percentage" of employees working for the company in Berkshire County had completed the required Tri-Town Health Department training. 
 
"I feel like the employees are going through the motions," Armstrong said, saying it feels like the attitude in the company is one that doesn't take the training seriously.
 
The company said most of that was due to IT issues. District Manager Ross McGowan said Tri-Town's training program was linked into Cumberland Farm's training system. But, when employees would click into it, the program would fail. On Cumberland Farm's side, it marked the program as done but Tri-Town's side would still say incomplete.
 
McGowan said the company is working with the IT department to correct the issue but in the meantime held classes for everybody without a certificate. There is only one employee remaining at the First Street store without certification and  McGowan said until that person completes the training, he will not be able to run the register.
 
He later questioned the efficiency of the training. Tri-Town's training has much that goes through YouTube and he said Cumberland Farms has to have its internet secured. He said it is complicated to secure such information as credit cards while still being able to connect with something like YouTube. He said the company moved to tablets to get the training done at one point but the secure connection remained an issue.
 
He said often it led to asking employees to do it from home. But, they aren't getting paid for it and they have to have internet. 
 
"It is very difficult for an hourly wage person to get through," he said.
 
He said each employee has to go through some two hours of training to pass. He questioned why he couldn't have it done in a classroom setting to train multiple employees at a time, rather than each individually.
 
"I want my team members trained. I want them to have the right tools in the toolbag when they get to the register and have to make a decision," McGowan said but said Tri-Towns is not that user-friendly and he suggests other options to make it quicker and easier.
 
Armstrong refuted the technology aspect saying companies have been able to have employees take the course at Tri-Town Health or training have been made available closer to the store.
 
"In the past, accommodations have always been made," Armstrong said.
 
Nonetheless, company officials said 45 percent of their business is tobacco sales and often those who purchase tobacco products buy other items as well. They said a seven-day suspension of the licenses would make a huge economic impact to the store.
 
In September, the Board of Health upheld a seven-day suspension for Thing or Two Variety. But, in that case, the board hadn't felt like the owner had taken it seriously. In this case, however, the company had made an effort to ensure was done properly.
 
Board of Health member Brad Gordon suggested an abeyance option as one that recognizes the effort Cumberland Farms put in but also keeps the enforcement of the Health Department in place. The fine will also remain in place. Armstrong agreed that abeyance would be fitting for such a situation and the rest of the board agreed.
 
Should there be a third violation, the store would be slapped with a 21-day licenses suspension and a $500 fine.

Tags: licensing board,   tobacco regulations,   violations,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories