image description

Only One Complaint Lodged Against Mount Greylock Superintendent

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Despite a maelstrom of social media chatter and an online petition that generated nearly 250 signatures, the Mount Greylock Regional School district has to date received just one formal complaint against its superintendent in the nearly three years she has occupied the corner office.
 
Superintendent Kimberley Grady has directed the district continuously since she was appointed acting superintendent in the fall of 2016.
 
The district has received one formal complaint against her, in March of this year.
 
In Grady's capacities as acting superintendent and later superintendent, she has answered directly to the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee and its antecedent committees at Lanesborough Elementary, Williamstown Elementary and Mount Greylock middle-high school prior to the district's full regionalization in 2018.
 
This spring, a Facebook post from a now former employee at Lanesborough Elementary was circulated widely on social media. In it, Grady is accused of being "smart, diabolical, and down right underhanded [sic]."
 
The nearly 500-word Facebook post does not include any specific allegations of incidents at any of the three schools, but it does include a call for Grady's supervisory body, the School Committee, to take action.
 
"Our School committee [sic] needs to get their heads out of the sand and wake up before our school district is run into the ground," the post read.
 
The Facebook post was followed up by an online petition that lists 15 positions in the three-school district that had been vacated since July 2016 — a period that includes four months of Grady's predecessor, then-Superintendent Douglas Dias.
 
"It cannot be that the School Committee views such turnover as routine, let alone indicative of effective and appropriate top-level leadership," the petition reads.
 
A printed copy of the online petition was later hand-delivered to the School Committee during a meeting.
 
In the weeks following the Facebook post and petition, iBerkshires.com repeatedly asked for details of any allegations against the superintendent that have been considered by the committee, but those requests were declined on the advice of the district's counsel because of confidentiality issues.
 
On May 15, iBerkshires.com submitted a request under the commonwealth's public records act that sought the answer to a narrowly drawn question: "the number(s) of actionable, formal, written accusations of misconduct, mismanagement or abuse of district personnel that have been brought to the attention of her supervising body, the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee (and its predecessors: the Williamstown Elementary School Committee, Lanesborough Elementary School Committee and Mount Greylock 'Transition Committee')."
 
The request specified the time periods covered to include Grady's time as acting/interim superintendent, the time in which the Transition Committee was conducting a search for a full-time superintendent and since last April, when she was offered the job as full-time superintendent.
 
On Wednesday, Mount Greylock's records access officer, Jonathan Nopper, sent a written reply.
 
"In response to this request, the District would like to inform you that there has been one (1) formal complaint made against Ms. Grady, which occurred while employed as Superintendent of the District. Said complaint was emailed to the School Committee on Friday, March 21, 2019," Nopper wrote.
 
The letter does not note the complainant or the nature of the request. That information was not requested by iBerkshires.com because it likely would have triggered confidentiality and privacy concerns both for the accuser and accused.
 
The date of the one formal complaint the district has received was 19 days after the March 2 Facebook post that touched off the current controversy.
 
The controversy has been brought into School Committee meetings on a couple of occasions. The original Facebook poster has taken to attending meetings with a bright red anti-bullying T-shirt (the March 2 post refers to Grady as a "bully"). And a newspaper article about the petition prompted a comment from the floor during one of the committee's monthly meetings.
 
On March 27, The Berkshire Eagle ran a story about the issue that included an indirect quote from the chair of the School Committee, Joe Bergeron, that made it sound like the committee was not able effectively to supervise the superintendent.
 
"[T]here is not a set procedure for dealing with complaints about a superintendent other than during the annual employee performance evaluation process," the story reads in an indirect quote paraphrasing comments attributed to Bergeron.
 
"Any complaint is reviewed by school committee members individually and by the district's legal counsel," Bergeron said on Friday. "The district's legal counsel reviews and advises with knowledge of federal and state laws and the Superintendent's contract. If advised, the school committee then discusses specific charges or complaints following the Massachusetts General Laws regarding employment and the Open Meeting Law. 
 
"The Berkshire Eagle's 'paraphrased comment' was not regarding the school committee's procedures for handling of specific complaints or charges."
 
Two weeks after that article ran in The Eagle, the School Committee was addressed by a leader of Mount Greylock's teachers union during the public comment portion of one of the committee's meetings.
 
"The Mount Greylock Educators Association feels strongly that the School Committee has an ongoing responsibility to evaluate district administration and operations and should have a procedure at the ready to adequately deal with these types of situations," Marty Walter said.

Tags: complaints,   superintendent,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Town Meeting Debates, Passes by Large Margins, CPA Grants

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — As it has done nearly every time since the town adopted the provisions of the Community Preservation Act, town meeting Tuesday voted overwhelmingly to respect the decisions of its Community Preservation Committee and award the CPA grants recommended by that body.
 
Among the last actions of the nearly three-hour meeting were the approval of two heavily-discussed CPA grants, one of which generated a negative advisory vote from the town's Finance Committee.
 
That grant went to the Sand Springs Pool and Recreation Center, a $20,000 allotment of CPA funds to renovate and expand facilities at the facility.
 
The Fin Comm voted, 3-5, not to recommend town meeting OK the expenditure, and several residents took the floor at Tuesday night's meeting to argue against approving a grant that the center plans to use to improve its sauna.
 
"Why would we do such a thing?" asked Donald Dubendorf. "I understand we have 'recreational purposes' under the act, but why would we do such a thing when we are in dire straits in other areas, like housing?"
 
The executive director Sand Springs took the microphone to explain that an infrastructure investment in the sauna is part of a strategy to make the facility a year-round town asset and improve the non-profit's revenue stream.
 
Enhanced revenues, in turn, allow Sand Springs to keep its entry fees lower and provide scholarships to families of limited means, Henry Smith said, including in the summer months, when it is "the only public, guarded waterfront in town."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories