Letter: Support for Peter Beck for Planning Board

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I write to enthusiastically support Peter Beck for a five-year term on the Williamstown Planning Board. Peter was a star student at Yale Law School. I particularly enjoyed having him in an Advanced Property law seminar where, in an unusual reversal, I as the professor learned a tremendous amount from Peter due to his experience in local government and planning.

To all of us at Yale Law School, Peter was one of those students who seemed as wise and mature as one of our fellow colleagues. Peter wrote a brilliant, and brilliantly funny, paper on Property Law for my class, which won a coveted student award. The paper showed how one of the basic property law concepts taught in classrooms across the country — that property law is a "bundle of rights" — is absolutely ill-suited as a metaphor and in fact has a checkered past.

Peter will bring good judgment, good humor, generosity, intelligence, and expertise to Williamstown’s Planning Board and I think the community will be extremely happy with his contributions to your wonderful town, which I have visited on several occasions.

Claire Priest
New Haven, Conn.
Simeon E. Baldwin Professor,
Yale Law School

 

 

 

 


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories